Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 06 November 2024
Sec. Psychology of Language
Volume 15 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1507956

Corrigendum: Comparison of performance of automatic recognizers for stutters in speech trained with event or interval markers

This article is a correction to:

  1. Comparison of performance of automatic recognizers for stutters in speech trained with event or interval markers

    1. Read original article
\r\nLiam BarrettLiam Barrett1Kevin Tang,Kevin Tang2,3Peter Howell Peter Howell1*
  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 2Department of English Language and Linguistics, Institute of English and American Studies, Faculty of Arts and Humanities, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
  • 3Department of Linguistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States

A Corrigendum on
Comparison of performance of automatic recognizers for stutters in speech trained with event or interval markers

by Barrett, L., Tang, K., and Howell, P. (2024). Front. Psychol. 15:1155285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1155285

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 3. The figure was supposed to include data for a type of stuttered speech (Prolongations or “Prol.”). The corrected Figure 3 and its caption appear below.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Gaussian kernel density estimates of the relative frequencies of event lengths split by speech class from the UCLASS Event subset. X-axis gives event length in seconds and the Y-axis shows probability. Reproduced with permission from Barrett (2024).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: stuttering, speech pathology, automatic speech recognition, machine learning, computational paralinguistics, language diversity, language model, whisper

Citation: Barrett L, Tang K and Howell P (2024) Corrigendum: Comparison of performance of automatic recognizers for stutters in speech trained with event or interval markers. Front. Psychol. 15:1507956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1507956

Received: 08 October 2024; Accepted: 25 October 2024;
Published: 06 November 2024.

Edited and reviewed by: Laura M. Morett, University of Missouri, United States

Copyright © 2024 Barrett, Tang and Howell. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Peter Howell, p.howell@ucl.ac.uk

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.