Pedro Flores
Eduarda Coelho
Maria Isabel Mourão-Carvalhal
Pedro Forte- 1Department of Sports, Higher Institute of Education and Sciences of the Douro, Penafiel, Portugal
- 2Department of Sports, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
- 3Research Center in Sports, Health and Human Development, Covilhã, Portugal
- 4Research Center for Active Living and Well Being (Livewell), Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Bragança, Portugal
Poor maths skills are associated with negative outcomes throughout life, such as lower academic qualifications, decreased professional success and socio-economic results. Mathematical skills emerge continuously throughout childhood and those that children acquire in pre-school are crucial for activities that support analytical thinking, problem-solving and reasoning and argumentation skills. Many of these activities are related to motor skills, since certain cognitive and motor areas of the brain are activated simultaneously when solving maths problems. Of all motor skills, visuomotor integration skills have been documented as those that are most consistently positively and significantly associated with maths performance in pre-school children. These skills are influenced by visual perception (spatial and attention skills), fine motor coordination and gross motor skills. Early intervention can improve visuomotor integration skills in pre-school children. Of all skills that make up visuomotor integration, spatial skills, in addition to being the first skills to influence numerical knowledge and the recognition of geometric shapes, are also those skills that form part of the majority of programs and activities to be worked on with pre-school children for the development of mathematical concepts. However, most intervention programs or activities to develop spatial skills are carried out in the classroom, usually through activities involving handling small objects. In this sense and given the significant association between visuomotor integration skills and gross motor skills, the main objective of this study was to list a set of activities to develop spatial skills, with a strong involvement of gross motor skills, in a classroom, playground or home context.
1 Introduction
Mathematics is a way of thinking about the world and organizing experiences, involving reasoning and problem solving (Spodek, 2002). Poor maths skills are associated with negative outcomes throughout life, such as lower academic qualifications (Duncan et al., 2007; Chernyak et al., 2016), decreased professional success (Parsons and Bynner, 2005) and socio-economic outcomes (Ritchie and Bates, 2013). The development of these skills occurs in a hierarchical way (Von Aster and Shalev, 2007), already present in babies through discrimination of the numerosity of two sets (Hyde, 2011; Starr et al., 2013) and sense of measure (greater than and more than…) (Geist, 2009). In this sense, maths is learnt before school through numbers and quantities (McWayne et al., 2004; Geist, 2009). However, mathematical skills emerge continuously throughout childhood (Geist, 2009) and those that children acquire in pre-school are crucial for activities that support analytical thinking, problem solving and reasoning and argumentation skills (Clements et al., 2004). In this sense, it is essential in pre-school education to give continuity to this learning, which requires experiences related to their interests in everyday life, when they play and explore their daily lives (Silva et al., 2016), since at this stage of education children enjoy activities that develop their mathematical skills (Ginsburg et al., 2006).
Many of these activities are related to those that require bodily movement, and according to the theory of “Embodied Cognition,” cognition emerges from the individual’s “coupling” (embodied relationship) with the physical and social context, as a result of sensorimotor activity (Smith, 2005; Wilson and Foglia, 2011; Soylu and Newman, 2016). According to this theory, mathematical skills are interconnected with motor skills, since representations of distance, quantities and numbering are based on bodily experiences (Link et al., 2013; Fisher et al., 2018) and certain cognitive and motor areas of the brain are activated simultaneously when solving mathematical problems (Fischer and Brugger, 2011). Also, the idea of “learning to learn” suggests that early learning is centered around the motor system and as the child adapts to changes, cognitive and motor skills develop simultaneously (Adolph, 2005). Today, there is neurophysiological and neuroimaging evidence that the prefrontal cortex, cerebellum and connecting structures are coactivated in certain cognitive and motor tasks, suggesting an interrelationship between motor and cognitive development (Diamond, 2000; Abe and Hanakawa, 2009). In this sense, motor skills influence academic performance in the early years (Alvarez-Bueno et al., 2017;; Macdonald et al., 2018; De Waal, 2019; Duncan et al., 2019; Malambo et al., 2022), being described as one of the criteria for school readiness (Department for Education, 2020; Jones et al., 2021).
1.1 Maths curriculum guidelines for pre-school
Since the development of mathematical notions begins at a very early age (McWayne et al., 2004; Geist, 2009; Hyde, 2011; Starr et al., 2013), it is essential to continue this learning in pre-school (Silva et al., 2016), as the knowledge acquired in the early years will positively influence later learning (Clements et al., 2004).
Learning maths at these ages should be centered on activities that are meaningful to the child and that are associated with other content areas (Silva et al., 2016). Thus, according to the “Curriculum Guidelines for Pre-School” (Silva et al., 2016), in order to develop the various mathematical notions, the educator must take into account: (1) General processes; (2) Mathematical components.
The general processes are a set of processes that are transversal to the approach to mathematics, namely classification, sorting, reasoning and problem solving, and the mathematical components concern numbers and operations, organization and data processing, geometry and measurement, and interest and curiosity in mathematics (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Mathematical notions to be developed according to the curriculum guidelines for pre-school (Silva et al., 2016).
1.1.1 General processes
Classification implies that the child is able to distinguish, organize and establish relationships between objects by equality or difference.
Sorting implies that the child is able to order objects by quantity, height, size, thickness, speed and duration.
Mathematical reasoning involves using objects where children are encouraged to explain and justify solutions. Recognizing, understanding, and creating sequences of patterns are important elements in the development of mathematical reasoning.
Problem solving is the process of appropriating and integrating mathematical learning. The problems proposed to the child must have meaning for them (everyday activities) and the educator must use games and play for this purpose.
Regarding the mathematical components, four approaches are proposed: numbers and operations, data organization and processing, geometry and measurement, and interest and curiosity in mathematics.
1.1.2 Maths components
1.1.2.1 Numbers and operations
Numbers are abstractions that apply to a wide range of real and imaginary situations. They do not exist in isolation but make up a system of relationships and operations by which they can be compared, added, subtracted, multiplied and divided. It is these relationships that apply to a wide variety of problems (National Research Council, 2009). The development of number sense is progressive, as counting involves knowing the number sequence and matching term to term (Wynn, 1992; Sarnecka and Carey, 2008). Also, the ordering of numerals and the ability to compare magnitudes is related to the construction of a mental number line, where children become aware of the relationship between numbers (5 is more than 4; 6 is more than 5) (Silva et al., 2016).
Operations refer to basic arithmetic skills such as adding and subtracting and are used to relate quantities. Children are only prepared to develop these skills when they understand the concepts of cardinality and counting. These skills prepare children to develop more complex arithmetic skills such as multiplication and division (Barth et al., 2008; Canobi and Bethune, 2008).
1.1.3 Organization and data processing
The collection, organization and data processing is based on classification, counting and comparison. Statistics, as the quantitative analysis of data, is a very important area of maths that provides multiple opportunities for numerical development. In kindergarten life, there are many opportunities to collect, organize and interpret quantitative data from everyday situations and from carrying out experiments and projects (Silva et al., 2016).
1.1.4 Geometria e medida
Geometry and measurement provide systems for describing, representing, and understanding the world. Geometry is the study of shapes and spaces (two-dimensional—2-D and three-dimensional—3-D). Measurement has to do with how to determine the size of object shapes (National Research Council, 2009). In everyday life, these skills are present in countless situations and can be mobilized so that the child realizes how useful they are in everyday life (Silva et al., 2016).
1.1.5 Geometry
Strongly associated with spatial development (orientation and spatial visualization) (Gelman and Williams, 1997) and analysis and operations with shapes (Anderson, 2000).
Spatial development includes two main skills, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization of images. Spatial orientation involves knowing where you are and how to get around in the world (Gelman and Williams, 1997). Children learn words like “next to” and “between.” Later, they learn words referring to frames of reference, such as “in front of,” “behind.” The words “left” and “right” are learnt much later, and are a source of confusion for several years (Gopnik and Meltzoff, 1986). In these early years, children can also learn to analyze a route through a space (Wang and Spelke, 2002). A visualização espacial de imagens é compreender e executar movimentos imaginados de objetos 2-D e 3-D. Para o efeito, é necessário ser capaz de criar uma imagem mental e manipulá-la através de uma estreita relação entre estas duas capacidades cognitivas. A visualização espacial de imagens tem sido positivamente associada à construção e composição de formas (Sarama et al., 1996).
Analysis and operations with shapes is the basic way in which children learn the names of objects (Jones and Smith, 2002) and the ability to recognize and combine shapes (Anderson, 2000).
In this sense, it is through spatial development, as well as the relationship and manipulation of objects, that children can learn what is “far” and “near,” “inside,” “outside” and “between,” “open” and “closed,” “above” and “below,” which also allows them to recognize and represent different geometric shapes that they will gradually learn to differentiate, name and characterize (Silva et al., 2016).
1.1.6 Measurement
Measuring is a process that involves children starting to identify the measurable attributes of objects (length, weight, capacity, volume, time, temperature, etc.) from their everyday experiences (Silva et al., 2016). Initially, this process is based on directly comparing and ordering objects (longer, shorter, of equal length, heavier, lighter, etc.), gradually making it more difficult by using non-standardized units of measurement (cup, foot or shoe, etc.). These experiences enable children to gradually understand the usefulness of measuring instruments and standardized measures, as these are also part of their daily lives (Silva et al., 2016).
One way of more formally assessing children’s understanding of measurement is through comparison tasks (Mullet and Paques, 1991).
1.1.7 Interest and curiosity in maths
Maths is present in the majority of children’s everyday activities (National Research Council, 2009). In this sense, the teacher has a fundamental role to play in developing their interest and curiosity by drawing the child’s attention to the presence of maths in the world around them (Silva et al., 2016). In this sense, the aim is to stimulate children’s natural curiosity by providing them with favorable mathematical experiences so that mathematics becomes an engaging and permanently interesting challenge (Geist, 2009).
1.2 Motor skills
Traditionally, motor skills are divided into two categories, gross motor skills (GMS) and fine motor skills (FMS) (Grissmer et al., 2010; Oberer et al., 2017; Goodway et al., 2019). As for GMS, they basically use movements produced by large muscle groups. They include locomotor skills, which involve moving the body in space (walking, running, jumping and sliding), postural or balance skills, which refer to the ability to maintain a controlled position or posture during a task (dynamic balance—maintaining position in activities that require movement; or static balance—maintaining position in stationary tasks) and manipulative skills, used to control objects in actions with the hands or feet (grasping, tapping, absorbing, lifting, etc.)., which can be propulsive (sending objects) or receptive (receiving objects) (Lopes et al., 2013; Magistro et al., 2015; Kokstejn et al., 2017; Haywood and Getchell, 2019). FMS are defined as movements produced by small muscle groups. One type of FMS is fine motor coordination (FMC) or visuomotor coordination, which refers to movements involving hand-eye coordination, manual dexterity, motor sequencing and speed and precision, and can also be referred to as non-graphomotor skills (Davis and Matthews, 2010; Suggate et al., 2018). Another type of FMS is visual and motor integration, called visuomotor integration (VMI) or visuospatial integration, which refers to the organization of small muscle movements of the hand and fingers through the processing of visual and spatial stimuli, based more on synchronized hand-eye movements (Carlson et al., 2013; Goodway et al., 2019) and are typically tasks involving writing, drawing, copying shapes, letters or other stimuli (Beery and Buktenica, 1997; Oberer et al., 2017), which can be referred to as graphomotor skills (Davis and Matthews, 2010).
Among these skills, recent systematic review studies concluded that it was mainly the FMS that justified mathematical academic performance in preschool children (van der Fels et al., 2015;Macdonald et al., 2018; Flores et al., 2023a; Figure 2).
Figure 2. Summary of fine motor skills categories (adapted from Flores et al., 2023a).
Although a relationship between VMI and FMC has been demonstrated (Sortor and Kulp, 2003; Beery and Beery, 2006; Carlson et al., 2013; Byers et al., 2016), where children with better FMC may be better at manipulating objects, which allows them to direct additional attention resources to new learning, namely VMI (Kim et al., 2018), FMC has not been found to be a consistent predictor of later academic performance (Kim et al., 2018). In this sense, among the FMS, VMI skills have been documented as those that are most consistently positively and significantly associated with maths performance (Macdonald et al., 2018; Flores et al., 2023a).
1.3 Development of the VMI and its connection to maths
The development of VMI skills is very sensitive and dynamic with rapid growth between the ages of 4 and 7 (Decker et al., 2011), peaking between the ages of 4 and 5 (Fang et al., 2017), but continuing until at least the age of 12 (Decker et al., 2011). In this sense, considering the age of rapid growth of the VMI and the age of preschool attendance, it is important that this skill is well worked on at this academic stage.
The literature has been consistent in describing that VMI skills are a multidimensional construct and its main components are visual perception and FMC skills (Osborn et al., 1984; Korkman et al., 1998; Tseng and Chow, 2000; Beery and Beery, 2006, 2010; Newcombe and Frick, 2010; Carlson et al., 2013; Dinehart and Manfra, 2013; Memisevic and Hadzic, 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Verdine et al., 2014; Goodway et al., 2019). VMI is defined as a person’s ability to visually perceive and understand the spatial relationships between objects and to manipulate, construct or reproduce models using the FMC (Korkman et al., 1998; Beery and Beery, 2010; Carlson et al., 2013; Verdine et al., 2014). However, success in tasks that require VMI skills not only requires children to coordinate their visual, spatial and motor skills (Verdine et al., 2014), but also attention control (Korkman et al., 1998; Beery and Beery, 2004; Becker et al., 2014). In this sense, VMI requires the integration of visual and spatial skills and executive attention, as well as FMC (Beery and Beery, 2004; Figure 3).
Figure 3. Components of VMI.
Vision is the system best equipped to structure space, since it structures, organizes and interprets all the spatial dimensions, and only then can motor actions come into play. It is between the ages of 3 and 7 that children should master all the notions of orientation: up, down, in front, behind, inside/outside, big, small, high, low, here, there, near, far, etc. In this sense, if children have spatial difficulties, they may have problems with localization, orientation, conservation of distance, surface area, volume and speed, which are the basis for the formulation of many mathematical concepts (Fonseca, 2010).
It has been documented that tasks requiring VMI skills, i.e., the integration of motor and visual processes, are highly related to the development of mathematical skills (Zebian, 2005; Puranik and Lonigan, 2012; Becker et al., 2014). This skill allows children to represent quantities, reproduce and perform transformations of shapes (Cameron et al., 2019). These activities are strongly associated with the development of quantitative tasks, numerical representations and mathematical performance (Verdine et al., 2017).
The literature has been consistent in supporting that in preschoolers executive function and VMI contribute unique and shared variance to mathematics performance (Cameron et al., 2012; Becker et al., 2014; Cragg and Gilmore, 2014; Verdine et al., 2014), revealing bidirectional influences between mathematics, executive function and VMI (Brock et al., 2018a). Executive function refers to higher-order cognitive skills used in information processing and problem solving (Blair, 2010; Beck et al., 2011) and its components include inhibition, cognitive flexibility, working memory, planning and updating (Blair and Razza, 2007; Herbers et al., 2011).
In early childhood, executive function and VMI co-develop (Cameron et al., 2016). Although these skills are considered separate processes, any task that requires visual perception (spatial and attention skills) to solve problems will require executive function (Korkman et al., 1998). However, it has been suggested that VMI is related to mathematical performance even after executive function has been controlled, specifically in geometry (spatial reasoning) (Duran et al., 2018). Verdine et al. (2014) concluded that even when the effects of other variables are removed, such as vocabulary and executive function, spatial abilities are a unique predictor of overall math performance, explaining 27.1% of its variability. In this sense, VMI skills can independently contribute to math performance (Verdine et al., 2014; Duran et al., 2018).
Also, in a recent study by Flores et al. (2023b), the authors concluded that VMI directly, positively and significantly influenced maths performance in preschool children with typical development and that GMS could indirectly contribute to maths performance, justified by the positive and direct associations with VMI skills. In this sense, the results of this study suggest the inclusion of GMS in structured programs to develop VMI and thus contribute to mathematical performance (Flores et al., 2023b).
Although deficits in any of these processes affect the results of VMI (Daly et al., 2003; Carlson et al., 2013; Van Wyk et al., 2020), all these skills are malleable and can be trained (Diamond and Lee, 2011; Uttal et al., 2013).
VMI skills are used in most everyday tasks with an emphasis on early maths learning (Mix and Cheng, 2012; Verdine et al., 2014; Zhang and Lin, 2015; Mix et al., 2016). It has been shown that basic maths skills are directly dependent on VMI (Cameron et al., 2012; Becker et al., 2014; Carlson et al., 2014; Grissmer et al., 2014; Verdine et al., 2014), which is justified by the fact that classroom tasks often require this type of skill (Dehaene and Cohen, 2007). In addition to VMI skills influencing maths skills in preschool, they are a significant predictor of maths when children enter school (Gunderson et al., 2012; Rittle-Johnson et al., 2019). Furthermore, research in cognitive neuroscience points to a neural basis that links VMI skills with maths (Hubbard et al., 2005; St Clair-Thompson and Gathercole, 2006; Dehaene, 2011), namely in numerical operations skills (Dehaene et al., 2004; Hubbard et al., 2009) and damage to the parietal cortex often results in deficiencies in spatial and numerical skills (Bueti and Walsh, 2009).
In a recent systematic review carried out by Flores et al. (2023a), the authors found that all the mathematical skills proposed by National Research Council (2009) for preschool were associated with VMI skills: numeracy (Verdine et al., 2014; Osorio-Valencia et al., 2017; Duran et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018; Nesbitt et al., 2019; Escolano-Pérez et al., 2020; Khng and Ng, 2021), addition and subtraction (Becker et al., 2014; Brock et al., 2018a; Duran et al., 2018; Cameron et al., 2019; Nesbitt et al., 2019; Khng and Ng, 2021), measurement (Dinehart and Manfra, 2013; Manfra et al., 2017; Duran et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018; Nesbitt et al., 2019; Greenburg et al., 2020) and geometry (Manfra et al., 2017; Duran et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2018; Greenburg et al., 2020).
Since the development of VMI skills seems to be positively influenced by the visual perception skills (spatial and attention skills) of FMC and GMS, it was necessary to understand the relationship between these components of VMI and maths skills.
1.3.1 Spatial skills and its connection to maths
Spatial ability is a generic term for a multitude of related abilities that include the mental manipulation of information about objects in the environment and spaces we inhabit (Uttal et al., 2013). A recent meta-analysis sought to define spatial abilities and concluded that there were four distinct types of spatial abilities based on the intersection of two dimensions. One is related to information, which can be intrinsic and extrinsic, and the other is related to tasks, which can be static and dynamic (Uttal et al., 2013). Intrinsic information concerns the properties of an object (constitution/shape) and extrinsic information concerns the location of the object (left/right/front/back/near/far, etc.). In terms of tasks, static tasks do not change the object’s properties (shape or position), while dynamic tasks change the object’s properties. Spatial skills develop very early in children through everyday activities, such as observing and exploring their surroundings (Barros and Palhares, 2001; Uttal et al., 2013). With regard to tasks, in static tasks the object’s properties (shape or position) do not change, while in dynamic tasks the object’s properties change. Spatial skills are developed very early in children through everyday activities such as observing and exploring their surroundings (Barros and Palhares, 2001; Uttal et al., 2013). These activities allow children to explore space and become aware of their relationship and position with objects (near/far/outside/inside/open/closed/top/bottom), as well as progressively recognizing their geometric shapes (Silva et al., 2016). There is a growing realization that spatial abilities are an important aspect of intellectual capacity and that they are separable from general intelligence (Hegarty and Waller, 2004), and although they are always present in children’s daily lives, they have been largely ignored in formal educational environments (Clements and Sarama, 2011). However, some efforts have already been made to include this approach in school environments (Moss et al., 2015; Silva et al., 2016).
Literature has shown a strong association between these spatial and mathematical skills (Ansari et al., 2003; Gunderson et al., 2012; Mix and Cheng, 2012). A factor analysis found that these skills are significant predictors of maths skills in preschool, third and sixth grades (Mix et al., 2016). In children aged between 4.5 and 7.5 years, positive and significant relationships have been identified in tasks that required children to remember and reproduce a series of spatial locations with number naming and number magnitude processing (LeFevre et al., 2010), as well as problem solving (Cheng and Mix, 2014; Zhang and Lin, 2015; Skagerlund and Träff, 2016). Children who develop better spatial representations acquire additional mathematical skills earlier (Bachot et al., 2005; Bailey et al., 2014). In a study carried out by Hawes et al. (2017), which aimed to investigate the extent to which spatial learning supports children’s numerical development, the results showed that only those in the intervention group made significant gains in mathematical numerical comparison skills. These skills are strongly related to simultaneous and subsequent mathematical performance (De Smedt et al., 2013; Nosworthy et al., 2013).
There is evidence that early spatial skills longitudinally predicted early numerical knowledge skills (such as plus, minus, equals and second) and that spatial skills assessed at 3 years and later at 4 years, even after controlling for executive functioning and vocabulary skills, predicted approximately 15% of the variability in early number knowledge (Verdine et al., 2014), thus early interventions aimed at improving spatial skills are justified (De Smedt et al., 2013; Grissmer et al., 2013).
Mathematical concepts are also based on mental representations of objects that are developed by the child’s interaction with physical objects through play and games (Ginsburg, 1977; Clements and Sarama, 2011) where children are able to represent and interpret numerical information spatially (Gunderson et al., 2012) and use strategies to solve problems (Mata et al., 2011). Recently, it has been suggested that infants’ spatial processing acts as a later precursor to maths at the age of 4 (Lauer and Lourenco, 2016). In addition, spatial memory in young children has been associated with their mathematical performance (Holmes et al., 2008; LeFevre et al., 2010; Meyer et al., 2010; Hornung et al., 2011; Passolunghi and Mammarella, 2012; Szucs et al., 2013). Given the importance of spatial memory, it has been recommended that it should be given the same importance and the same amount of instructional time as numeracy from pre-school to 8th grade (National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 2006). However, geometry and spatial thinking are often minimized in pre-school education (Clements and Sarama, 2011). This can be explained by the fact that preschool teachers receive little professional training in geometry and spatial thinking (Ginsburg et al., 2006), compared to other maths topics (Lee, 2010). During preschool education, it is essential that children are able to use symmetry, create mental images of geometric shapes, recognize and represent shapes from different perspectives and assemble and disassemble two- and three-dimensional shapes (Frick et al., 2014; Hawes et al., 2015). In this sense, there is an urgent need for more training for preschool teachers on the importance and teaching of spatial skills in pre-school education. It has been shown that children show high levels of motivation during activities involving spatial skills (Naqvi et al., 2013; Taylor and Hutton, 2013).
1.3.2 Executive attention skills and its connections to maths
Regarding attention, theoretical and empirical evidence, supported by the results of neuroimaging studies, indicates that the processes of attention and VMI are related (Diamond, 2000; Floyer-Lea and Matthews, 2004), since tasks that require VMI also require attentional control (Beery and Beery, 2004; Becker et al., 2014). In the light of the embodied cognition theory, attention control and VMI co-develop as children interact with the environment (Campos et al., 2000). Also, automaticity theory argues that cognitive resources become available as someone is able to automatize or perform a task without using all their attention, which in turn makes it easier to simultaneously perform a second task that requires attention (Floyer-Lea and Matthews, 2004). In this sense, children who automate a task that requires VMI do not need to pay as much attention to the execution of visual and motor movements, so they can have additional cognitive resources available for other tasks (Floyer-Lea and Matthews, 2004). In this sense, executive attention is related to the development of a variety of early mathematical skills in the face of the influence exerted by VMI (LeFevre et al., 2013).
1.3.3 FMC skills and its connection to maths
FMC refers to muscular coordination that produces minute and precise movements (Kimmel and Ratliff-Schaub, 2011) without strongly needing visual and spatial information (Korkman et al., 1998; Carlson et al., 2013). Although FMC does not depend on visual and spatial information, these motor skills can be relevant for many tasks in the early years of schooling (Marr et al., 2003). Since VMI involves the mental representation of an image that is replicated by controlling the minute movement of the fingers (Carlson et al., 2013), FMC plays a very important role in school success (Roebers et al., 2014; Kim et al., 2015; Fischer et al., 2020), since children with better FMC may be better at manipulating objects, such as pencils or notebooks, which allows them to direct additional attention resources to learning instead of focusing them on movements associated with FMC (Kim et al., 2018). In this sense, a child with good FMC, when performing an academic task, can impose a lower cognitive load compared to a child who still shows difficulties in FMC (Floyer-Lea and Matthews, 2004; Luo et al., 2007; Cameron et al., 2015). Therefore, FMC is considered a precursor to VMI (Kim et al., 2016) and the correlations are positive and significant (Carlson et al., 2013).
In a recent systematic review, one of the aims of which was to identify the specific motor skills that were positively associated with mathematics in pre-school children, the authors concluded that VMI was, among all the motor skills, the one that stood out the most (Flores et al., 2023a). However, the authors also identified positive and significant relationships between FMC and mathematical skills. A cross-sectional study involving 4- and 5-year-old preschool children concluded that performance on FMC significantly predicts fractional reasoning tasks (R2 = 0.258; p = 0.003) (Clark et al., 2021). Other cross-sectional studies found that FMC was related to finger-based numerical representations (Suggate et al., 2017; Fischer et al., 2020) and counting (Manfra et al., 2017; Fischer et al., 2018). Fingers have long been used to help with counting and calculation and their use in early counting is almost universal (Butterworth, 1999; Crollen and Noël, 2015). Using the finger not only helps children learn to count, but can also help them understand the meaning of numbers (Fischer, 2008; Fischer et al., 2018). Recent studies have found that only CMF (agility and dexterity) predicted initial calculation skills in the early years (Suggate et al., 2017; Fischer et al., 2018). However, as the child’s age progresses, finger dexterity no longer correlated significantly with ordinal and cardinal representations, and it is possible that the child’s spatial abilities play a more important role in counting (Fisher et al., 2020). Therefore, given the importance of manual dexterity in counting in the early preschool years, the use of the finger should be encouraged to develop numerical skills and simultaneously train these skills (Fisher et al., 2020). Longitudinal studies have also positively associated FMC with later mathematical performance (Dinehart and Manfra, 2013; Osorio-Valencia et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2018; Greenburg et al., 2020). In this sense, given the relationship between FMC and VMI and mathematical skills, these types of motor skills should be developed through intervention programs.
1.3.4 GMS and its connections to maths
GMS refers to movements produced by large muscle groups (Haywood and Getchell, 2019) and there is neural evidence to support that the development of these motor skills stimulates the development of the central nervous system, contributing to the development of VMI (Mujkic and Papric, 2013; Wang et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2019). It has also been argued that in the same motor action it is complex to clearly differentiate the independent involvement of each of the motor skills (GMS and FMS), since they coexist and are fundamental for the efficient performance of the task (Payne and Isaacs, 2012; Flatters et al., 2014). This can be justified by the fact that higher-order neuromotor processes seem to be involved simultaneously in GMS and FMS, since these processes do not occur independently (Roebers and Kauer, 2009; Oberer et al., 2017). Thus, children with difficulties in GMS are more likely to show problems in VMI skills (Wassenberg et al., 2005; Oberer et al., 2017).
Although some authors suggest significant associations between GMS and maths mastery (Son and Meisels, 2006; Pagani et al., 2010; De Waal, 2019), the literature is inconsistent and insufficient to report the relationships between specific components of GMS and maths performance in preschool (Macdonald et al., 2018; Escolano-Pérez et al., 2020; Macdonald et al., 2020; Flores et al., 2023a). Despite the inconsistency of the results, these skills should be part of the work of early childhood teachers, since this educational period should contribute to the integral development of children (Escolano-Pérez et al., 2020). In any case, this inclusion is justified by the fact that studies have concluded that GMS promote the development of social skills, physical well-being (Cameron et al., 2016; Goodway et al., 2019; Haywood and Getchell, 2019) and perceived athletic competence in childhood (Piek et al., 2006). In addition, preschool children involved in a structured, cognitively challenging GMS program could contribute to the improvement of mathematical skills through the direct effect exerted on the improvement of FMS (Hudson et al., 2021). Flores et al. (2023b), in a study carried out with pre-school children (between 3 and 6 years old), concluded that GMS could indirectly contribute to mathematical performance, justified by the significant, positive and direct associations with VMI skills. In this sense, the results of this study suggest the inclusion of GMS in structured programs to develop VMI and thus contribute to mathematical performance (Flores et al., 2023b).
As the literature shows, in order to promote the development of VMI skills, it will be necessary to include work on the visual perception skills (spatial and attention skills) of FMC and GMS in intervention programs.
2 Intervention programs to develop VMI
As already mentioned, all the processes that can directly influence VMI, namely visual perception (spatial skills and attention skills), FMC and GMS, are malleable and trainable (Diamond and Lee, 2011; Uttal et al., 2013). Early intervention improves VMI skills in preschool and early school-age children (Parush and Hahn-Markowitz, 1997; Dankert et al., 2003). There is evidence from the fields of physiotherapy and occupational therapy to indicate that early deficits in fine motor skills can be improved or corrected through interventions (Bayona et al., 2006; Ratzon et al., 2007). Most studies have proven the effectiveness of long interventions, at least 7 months, to improve VMI skills (Parush and Hahn-Markowitz, 1997; Case-Smith, 2002), however, a 3-month period of just 12 therapeutic sessions is of great importance for improving VMI (Ratzon et al., 2009).
In this sense, given the implications of VMI for mathematical skills, it is essential to include programs in the preschool curriculum that aim to explicitly train VMI skills (Uttal and Cohen, 2012; Newcombe et al., 2013; Brock et al., 2018b).
The literature has highlighted some programs to improve mathematical skills with the inclusion of activities that promote the development of VMI. Table 1 shows some of these programs, the objectives to be worked on related to VMI skills, the associated activities, the context in which the program is developed, and the main motor skills involved.
Table 1. Programs to develop VMI.
Looking at Table 1, all the programs aim to develop VMI by working on spatial skills using manipulative objects to reproduce/construct geometric shapes (Hohmann and Weikart, 2002; Klein and Starkey, 2002; Casey, 2004; Sarama and Clements, 2004; Casey et al., 2008), patterns (Groth-Marnat and Teal, 2000; Hohmann and Weikart, 2002; Klein and Starkey, 2002; Moss et al., 2016; Brock et al., 2018b), positions and orientations in space (Hohmann and Weikart, 2002; Greenes et al., 2004; Moss et al., 2016; Brock et al., 2018b). Some of the activities that prevail in these programs are: matching games; manipulating and building with Legos and blocks (horizontally and vertically); constructing puzzles; going through and tracing labyrinths; making threads with various sequences (different patterns - size, colors, shapes, etc.); copying sequences of shapes and figures; making graphs; manipulating different objects to reproduce shapes and patterns; identifying positions in space.
A common element of all these intervention programs/activities to develop VMI is that they are applied in a classroom context without heavy reliance on GMS. In this sense, the aim of this article is to present and justify a set of activities to develop spatial skills with a significant involvement of GMS, to be applied in a classroom, playground or family (home) context.
3 Activities to develop spatial skills with a strong contribution from GMS
Spatial skills can be developed through specific physical activity programs for pre-school children (Hraste et al., 2018). For example, in Sweden, maths teaching in preschool is supported by physical activity and music (National Research Council, 2009). Elofsson et al. (2018) showed that children with and without motor skills problems benefited in mathematical learning when they were placed in an environment characterized by physical activity and music. These results are consistent with previous research (Donelly and Lambourne, 2011; Rasberry et al., 2011).
Structured physical activity programs for preschool children should focus on playful activities in the form of games (Geist, 2009; Yu et al., 2018; Zosh et al., 2018). These types of activities do not guarantee mathematical development, but they offer great opportunities for discovering mathematical concepts (Geist, 2009). Simple motor actions, exploring and mastering certain materials (balls, ropes, hoops, balloons, rackets, etc.), allow children to explore the relationship between their bodies and objects moving in space (Silva et al., 2016). There is evidence that using words such as inside, outside, below, above, near, far, etc. helps children to solve spatial problems and consequently improve their skills in this area (Pruden et al., 2011). However, some specific motor skills of locomotion or object manipulation are not acquired innately as children grow (Clark, 2005), they must be learned and practiced (Pic et al., 2018, 2020) through structured programs during early childhood (Logan et al., 2012; Robinson et al., 2015; Coutinho et al., 2016; Dapp et al., 2021), suggesting that early intervention could reduce or prevent potential mathematical difficulties (Duncan et al., 2007).
In this sense, there are manuals and books that promote mathematical performance through the exploration of motor skills. An extraordinary example is the book “Mathekings” (Hoenisch and Niggemeyer, 2007). According to the authors, children explore the world and discover mathematics through their senses. This book, designed for children aged between 4 and 8, allows them to work with and develop mathematical concepts such as quantities, sorting and matching, patterns and symmetry, numbers, geometry, space and time, weighing, measuring and comparing, graphs, matching and function, and even statistics, through the handling of everyday materials and body movements, whether in the classroom, on the playground or at home. Another example is the book Preschool Math (Williams et al., 2005). This book encourages educators to listen to and observe young children in order to better understand how they think about their world. The book uses these stimuli to develop useful and appropriate mathematical experiences in which children use their senses and bodies to explore ideas, record and talk about concepts and learn how mathematics is felt, tasted and seen. The proposed activities allow children to evaluate, explore, experiment, solve problems, make assumptions and form hypotheses, while using interesting materials and environments in a mathematical way. To enrich and diversify activities for children, the book “Why Play Matters: 101 Activities for Developmental Play to Support Young Children” (Essame, 2023), is full of play-based activities to support the development of children between the ages of 0 and 8. Based on the holistic and inclusive model of Developmental Play, which includes sensory play, creative-exploratory play, meaning-making play and higher play, the activities focus on supporting aspects of social, emotional, physical and cognitive development. Since play is fundamental to a child’s holistic development, this book is essential reading for early childhood professionals, elementary school teachers, occupational therapists and parents.
Spatial reasoning is an integral part of everyday life, and having good spatial skills strongly predicts children’s future performance in various subjects. In this sense, the books “Exploring the 3-D World: Developing Spatial and Math Skills for Young Children” (Hansel, 2021) and “Blocks and Beyond: Strengthening Early Math and Science Skills through Spatial Learning” are resources that promote the teaching of spatial skills in early childhood that contain research-based ideas and practical activities for early childhood educators to promote spatial development in children throughout the school day.
In this sense, considering the direct influence of GMS on VMI skills (Flores et al., 2023b) and that numerous programs to develop VMI skills include working on spatial skills through the manipulation of objects in a classroom context, the aim of this study was to present a set of activities to develop spatial skills, using playful activities with a strong involvement of GMS, which could be carried out in a classroom context, at the playground or at home.
The activities presented in the next section of this manuscript were taken and adapted from the book “Exercitar para Aprender” (Flores and Magalhães, 2019).
3.1 Ativities
All the proposed activities should be carried out in a playful way in the context of a game. The purpose of the activity should be well explained and practiced before the games begin. For each activity, it should be said: “let us see who does it well,” or “who is faster,” or “who hits the most,” etc. The teacher should correct whenever the child’s performance requires it (Weisberg and Zosh, 2018; Yu et al., 2018; Zosh et al., 2018). The proposed activities can be worked on in the classroom, playground or at home (Table 2).
Table 2. Activities to develop spatial skills with a strong contribution from GMS.
4 Discussion
Given the importance of mathematics in future academic and professional outcomes (Parsons and Bynner, 2005; Duncan et al., 2007) there has been increasing attention to mathematical learning and development in preschool education (Cross et al., 2009; Elofsson et al., 2016). In this sense, it is important to give children the same opportunities to support early mathematical development through interventions (Jordan et al., 2012).
VMI skills have been documented as those that are most consistently positively and significantly associated with math performance in preschool children (Cameron et al., 2012; Carlson et al., 2014; Grissmer et al., 2014; Verdine et al., 2014; Flores et al., 2023a). These skills are influenced by visual perception (spatial and attention skills) (Ansari et al., 2003; Gunderson et al., 2012; Mix and Cheng, 2012; Mix et al., 2016), the FMC (Dinehart and Manfra, 2013; Manfra et al., 2017; Osorio-Valencia et al., 2017; Suggate et al., 2017; Fischer et al., 2018, 2020; Kim et al., 2018; Greenburg et al., 2020) and GMS skills (Son and Meisels, 2006; Pagani et al., 2010; De Waal, 2019). Of all the processes that influence VMI, spatial skills are worked on in most of the activities proposed to preschool children for the development of mathematical concepts. Although there are several educational programs aimed at developing arithmetic skills in preschoolers (Elofsson et al., 2018), these programs include working on spatial skills using board games (Elofsson et al., 2016). In this sense, most of these activities are carried out in the classroom context only through the handling of small objects, without strong dependence on GMS (Elofsson et al., 2018).
Given the significant association between GMS and VMI, the aim of this study was to propose a set of activities to develop spatial skills, with a strong participation of GMS in the classroom, playground or at home.
The inclusion of GMS is not only due to the fact that these skills contribute directly to the development of VMI skills, but is also justified by the fact that the main objective of this educational period is to contribute to the child’s overall development (Goodway et al., 2019; Haywood and Getchell, 2019). However, the reality is that the work on motor skills in preschool has not been highly valued, a fact that seems to be due to the common misconception that children develop their motor skills naturally (Escolano-Pérez et al., 2020). The truth is that the development of motor skills is related to practicing them (Logan et al., 2012; Pic et al., 2020). However, learning focuses primarily on academic content, limiting preschool children’s opportunities to develop motor skills in these educational environments (Cameron et al., 2016; Macdonald et al., 2020).
A meta-analysis of 50 studies showed that 25 of the studies reported a positive correlation between physical activity and math learning (Rasberry et al., 2011). Donelly and Lambourne (2011) revealed that students who integrated physical activity into their learning activities performed significantly better than the control group in mathematics. Studies have also shown that there is a correlation between children’s motor skills and mathematical performance (Lopes et al., 2013; Elofsson et al., 2018) and that children’s motor skills explained almost 16% of the variation in mathematical measures (Elofsson et al., 2018). Thus, a learning environment characterized by the inclusion of physical activity seems to have a positive effect on students’ general and specific learning of mathematics.
Structured physical activity should be a routine part of the preschool curriculum (Escolano-Pérez et al., 2020). These activities should be taught primarily in a playful way, as this is the most natural way for children to learn and develop (Yu et al., 2018; Zosh et al., 2018).
Educators often lament the lack of resources and materials available to implement practices that improve preschoolers’ motor skills (Robinson et al., 2012). In this sense, this article seeks to respond to the current need to present a set of practical motor activities that make it possible to work on spatial skills, with a strong participation of GMS and thus develop VMI skills and consequently mathematical skills.
It will therefore be necessary for educators to increase play opportunities through physical activity programs to develop spatial skills, with a strong participation of the GMS, to ensure the development of VMI skills and thus contribute to the development of mathematical skills.
5 Conclusion
Since motor skills are not acquired innately, they must be learnt and practiced. In this study, the proposal to include gross motor skills in activities to develop visuomotor integration skills, namely spatial skills, will not only contribute to mathematical learning, but also the possibility of developing other coordinative and conditional physical skills, and contribute to the child’s health. In this sense, it is up to the teacher, depending on the material and spatial conditions, to select a set of activities, adjusted to the characteristics and abilities of the children, to develop visuomotor integration skills, through spatial skills, with a large involvement of gross motor skills.
Author contributions
PFl: Writing – original draft, Conceptualization. EC: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. MM-C: Writing – review & editing, Supervision. PFo: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abe, M., and Hanakawa, T. (2009). Functional coupling underlying motor and cognitive functions of the dorsal premotor cortex. Behav. Brain Res. 198, 13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.10.046
Adolph, K. E. (2005). “Learning to learn in the development of action” in Action as an organizer of learning and development: Minnesota symposia on child psychology. eds. J. J. Rieser, J. J. Lockman, and C. A. Nelson (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 91–122.
Alvarez-Bueno, C., Pesce, C., Cavero-Redondo, I., Sánchez-López, M., Garrido Miguel, M., and Martínez-Vizcaíno, V. (2017). Academic achievement and physical activity: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 140:e20171498. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-1498
Ansari, D., Donlan, C., Thomas, M. S. C., Ewing, S. A., Peen, T., and Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003). What makes counting count? Verbal and visuo-spatial contributions to typical and atypical number development. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 85, 50–62. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00026-2
Bachot, J., Gevers, W., Fias, W., and Roeyers, H. (2005). Number sense in children with visuospatial disabilities: orientation of the mental number line. Psychol. Sci. 47, 172–183,
Bailey, D. H., Siegler, R. S., and Geary, D. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Dev. Sci. 17, 775–785. doi: 10.1111/desc.12155
Barros, M., and Palhares, P. (2001). Emergência da matemática no jardim-de-infância. Porto: Porto Editora.
Barth, H., Beckmann, L., and Spelke, E. S. (2008). Nonsymbolic, approximate arithmetic in children: abstract addition prior to instruction. Dev. Psychol. 44, 1466–1477. doi: 10.1037/a0013046
Bayona, C. L., McDougall, J., Tucker, M. A., Nichols, M., and Mandich, A. (2006). School-based occupational therapy for children with fine motor difficulties: evaluating functional outcomes and fidelity of services. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 26, 89–110. doi: 10.1300/J006v26n03_07
Beck, D. M., Schaefer, C., Pang, K., and Carlson, S. M. (2011). Executive function in preschool children: test–retest reliability. J. Cogn. Dev. 12, 169–193. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2011.563485
Becker, D. R., Miao, A., Duncan, R., and McClelland, M. M. (2014). Behavioral self-regulation and executive function both predict visuomotor skills and early academic achievement. Early Child. Res. Q. 29, 411–424. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.014
Beery, K. E., and Beery, N. A. (2004). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration (Manual). Bloomington, MN: Pearson Assessments.
Beery, K. E., and Beery, N. A. (2006). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration with supplemental developmental tests of visual perception and motor coordination: administration, scoring and teaching manual. 5th Edn: Pearson.
Beery, K. E., and Beery, N. A. (2010). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration (Beery VMI): administration, scoring, and teaching manual. 6th Edn: Pearson.
Beery, K. E., and Buktenica, N. A. (1997). The Beery-Buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration: administration, scoring and teaching manual. 4th Edn. Parsippany, NJ: Modern Curriculum.
Blair, C. (2010). Stress and the development of self-regulation in context. Child Dev. Perspect. 4, 181–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2010.00145.x
Blair, C., and Razza, R. P. (2007). Relating effortful control, executive function, and false belief understanding to emerging math and literacy ability in kindergarten. Child Dev. 78, 647–663. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01019.x
Brock, L. L., Kim, H., and Grissmer, D. W. (2018a). Longitudinal associations among executive function, visuomotor integration, and achievement in a high-risk sample. Mind Brain Educ. 12, 23–27. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12164
Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., Cottone, E. A., Mashburn, A. J., and Grissmer, D. W. (2018b). An after-school intervention targeting executive function and visuospatial skills also improves classroom behavior. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 42, 474–484. doi: 10.1177/0165025417738057
Bueti, D., and Walsh, V. (2009). The parietal cortex and representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Biol. Sci. 364, 1831–1840. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
Byers, A. I., Cameron, C. E., Michelle, K., LoCasale-Crouch, J., and Grissmer, D. W. (2016). What preschool classroom experiences ate associated with whether children improve in visuomotor integration? Early Educ. Dev. 27, 976–1003. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2016.1175243
Cameron, C. E., Brock, L., Hatfield, B., Cottone, E., Rubinstein, E., LoCasale-Crouch, J., et al. (2015). Visuomotor integration and inhibitory control compensate for each other in school readiness. Dev. Psychol. 51, 1529–1543. doi: 10.1037/a0039740
Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., Bell, L. H., Worzalla, S. L., Grissmer, D., et al. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Dev. 83, 1229–1244. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01768.x
Cameron, C. E., Cottone, E. A., Murrah, W. M., and Grissmer, D. W. (2016). How are motor skills linked to children’s school performance and academic achievement? Child Dev. Perspect. 10, 93–98. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12168
Cameron, C. E., Kim, H., Ducan, R., Becker, D., and McClelland, M. (2019). Bidirectional and co-developing association of cognitive, mathematics, and literacy skills during kindergarten. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 62, 135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2019.02.004
Campos, J. J., Anderson, D. I., Barbu-Roth, M. A., Hubbard, E. M., Hertenstein, M. J., and Witherington, D. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy 1, 149–219. doi: 10.1207/S15327078IN0102_1
Canobi, K. H., and Bethune, N. E. (2008). Number words in young children’s conceptual and procedural knowledge of addition, subtraction, and inversion. Cognition 108, 675–686. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.011
Carlson, A. G., Rowe, E. W., and Curby, T. W. (2013). Disentangling fine motor skills’ relation to academic achievement: the differential impact of visual-spatial integration and visual motor coordination. J. Genet. Psychol. 174, 514–533. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2012.717122
Case-Smith, J. (2002). Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 56, 17–25. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.1.17
Casey, B. M. (2004). “Mathematics problem-solving adventures: A language-arts-based supplementary series for early childhood that focuses on spatial sense” in Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education. eds. D. H. Clements, J. Sarama, and A.-M. DiBiase (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers), 377–389.
Casey, B. M., Andrews, N., Schindler, H., Kersh, J. E., Samper, A., and Copley, J. (2008). The development of spatial skills through interventions involving block building activities. Cogn. Instr. 26, 269–309. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177177
Cheng, Y. L., and Mix, K. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. J. Cogn. Dev. 15, 2–11. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2012.725186
Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L., and Cordes, S. (2016). Numerical cognition explains age-related changes in third-party fairness. Dev. Psychol. 52, 1555–1562. doi: 10.1037/dev0000196
Clark, J. E. (2005). From the beginning: a developmental perspective on movement and mobility. Quest 57, 37–45. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2005.10491841
Clark, L., Shelley-Tremblay, J., and Cwikla, J. (2021). Shared developmental trajectories for fractional reasoning and fine motor ability in 4 and 5 year olds. Behav. Sci. 11:26. doi: 10.3390/bs11020026
Clements, D. H., and Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 14, 133–148. doi: 10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0
Clements, D. H., Sarama, J., and DiBiase, A. M. (2004). Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Coutinho, P., Mesquita, I., Davids, K., Fonseca, A. M., and Côté, J. (2016). How structured and unstructured sport activities aid the development of expertise in volleyball players. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 25, 51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2016.04.004
Cragg, L., and Gilmore, C. (2014). Skills underlying mathematics: the role of executive function in the development of mathematics proficiency. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 3, 63–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.12.001
Crollen, V., and Noël, M. P. (2015). The role of fingers in the development of counting and arithmetic skills. Acta Psychol. 156, 37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.007
Cross, C. T., Woods, T. A., and Schweingruber, H. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Daly, C. J., Kelley, G. T., and Krauss, A. (2003). Relationship between visual-motor integration and handwriting skills of children in kindergarten: a modified replication study. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 57, 459–462. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.4.459
Dankert, H. L., Davies, P. L., and Gavin, W. J. (2003). Occupational therapy effects on visual-motor skills in preschool children. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 57, 542–549. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.542
Dapp, L. C., Gashaj, V., and Roebers, C. M. (2021). Physical activity and motor skills in children: a differentiated approach. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 54:101916. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101916
Davis, J. L., and Matthews, R. N. (2010). Review of NEPSY-second edition (NEPSY-II). J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 28, 175–182. doi: 10.1177/0734282909346716
De Smedt, B., Noël, M. P., Gilmore, C., and Ansari, D. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2, 48–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
De Waal, E. (2019). Fundamental movement skills and academic performance of 5- to 6-year-old preschoolers. Early Childhood Educ. J. 47, 455–464. doi: 10.1007/s10643-019-00936-6
Decker, S. L., England, J. A., Carboni, J. A., and Brooks, J. H. (2011). Cognitive and developmental influences in visual-motor integration skills in young children. Psychol. Assess. 23, 1010–1016. doi: 10.1037/a0024079
Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: how the mind creates mathematics (rev upd p. 352). New York: Oxfrod Univeristy Press.
Dehaene, S., and Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 56, 384–398. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.004
Dehaene, S., Molko, N., Cohen, L., and Wilson, A. J. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 14, 218–224. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.008
Department for Education (2020). Early years foundation stage profile: 2020 handbook. Department for Education: London.
Diamond, A. (2000). Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 71, 44–56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00117
Diamond, A., and Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4-12 years old. Science 333, 959–964,
Dinehart, L., and Manfra, L. (2013). Associations between low-income children's fine motor skills in preschool and academic performance in second grade. Early Educ. Dev. 24, 138–161. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2011.636729
Donelly, J. E., and Lambourne, K. (2011). Classroom-based physical activity, cognition, and academic achievement. Prev. Med. 52, S36–S42. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.021
Duncan, G. J., Claessens, A., Magnuson, K., Klebanov, P., Pagani, L. S., Feinstein, L., et al. (2007). School readiness sand later achievement. Dev. Psychol. 43, 1428–1446. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
Duncan, M., Cunningham, A., and Eyre, E. (2019). A combined movement and story-telling intervention enhances motor competence and language ability in pre-schoolers to a greater extent than movement or story-telling alone. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev. 25, 221–235. doi: 10.1177/1356336X17715772
Duran, C. A. K., Byers, A., Cameron, C. E., and Grissmer, D. (2018). Unique and compensatory associations of executive functioning and Visuomotor integration with mathematics performance in early elementary school. Early Child. Res. Q. 42, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.08.005
Elofsson, J., Bohm, A. E., Jeppsson, C., and Samuelsson, J. (2018). Physical activity and music to support pre-school children’s mathematics learning. Education 46, 483–493. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2016.1273250
Elofsson, J., Gustafsson, S., Samuelsson, J., and Träff, U. (2016). Playing number board games supports 5-year-old Children’s early mathematical development. J. Math. Behav. 43, 134–147. doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.07.003
Escolano-Pérez, E., Herrero-Nivela, M. L., and Losada, J. L. (2020). Association between preschoolers’ specific fine (but not gross) motor skills and later academic competencies: educational implications. Front. Psychol. 11:1044. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01044
Essame, C. (2023). Why play matters: 101 activities for developmental play to support young children : Routledge.
Fang, Y., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., and Qin, J. (2017). The relationship of motor coordination, visual perception, and executive function to the development of 4-6-year-old Chinese preschoolers’ visual motor integration skills. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 42–54. doi: 10.1155/2017/6264254
Fischer, M. H. (2008). Finger counting habits modulate spatial numerical associations. Cortex 44, 386–392. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.004
Fischer, M. H., and Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Front. Psychol. 2:260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260
Fischer, U., Suggate, S. P., Schmirl, J., and Stoeger, H. (2018). Counting on fine motor skills: links between preschool finger dexterity and numerical skills. Dev. Sci. 21:e12623. doi: 10.1111/desc.12623
Fischer, U., Suggate, S. P., and Stoeger, H. (2020). The implicit contribution of fine motor skills to mathematical insight in early childhood. Front. Psychol. 11:1143. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01143
Flatters, I., Mushtaq, F., Hill, L. J. B., Rossiter, A., Jarrett-Peet, K., Culmer, P., et al. (2014). Children’s head movements and postural stability as a function of task. Exp. Brain Res. 232, 1953–1970. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3886-0
Flores, P., Coelho, E., Mourão-Carvalhal, M. I., and Forte, P. (2023a). Association between motor and math skills in preschool children with typical development: systematic review. Front. Psychol. 14:1105391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105391
Flores, P., Coelho, E., Mourão-Carvalhal, M. I., and Forte, P. (2023b). Relationships between math skills, motor skills, physical activity, and obesity in typically developing preschool children. Behav. Sci. :1000:13. doi: 10.3390/bs13121000
Floyer-Lea, A., and Matthews, P. M. (2004). Changing brain networks for visuomotorcontrol with increased movement automaticity. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 2405–2412. doi: 10.1152/jn.01092.2003
Fonseca, V. (2010). Manual de Observação Psicomotora: Significação Psiconeurológica dos seus Factores. 3rd Edn. Lisboa: Âncora Editora.
Frick, A., Möhring, W., and Newcombe, N. S. (2014). Development of mental transformation abilities. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 536–542. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.011
Geist, E. (2009). Children are born mathematicans - supporting mathematical development, birth to age 8. Columbus: Pearson.
Gelman, R., and Williams, E. M. (1997). “Enabling constraints for cognitive development and learning: domain specificity and epigenesis” in Cognition, perception, and language, volume 2: handbook of child psychology. eds. D. Kuhn and R. Siegler. 5th ed (New York: Wiley), 575–630.
Ginsburg, H. P., Kaplan, R. G., Cannon, J., Cordero, M. I., Eisenband, J. G., Galanter, M., et al. (2006). “Helping early childhood educators to teach mathematics” in Critical issues in early childhood professional development. eds. M. Zaslow and I. Martinez-Beck (Paul H. Brookes: Baltimore, MD), 171–202.
Goodway, J., Ozmun, J., and Gallahue, D. (2019). Understanding motor development: infants, children, adolescents, adults. 8th Edn. Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Gopnik, A., and Meltzoff, A. N. (1986). “Words, plans, things, and locations: interactions between semantic and cognitive development in the one-word stage” in The development of word meaning. eds. A. I. I. KuczajS and M. D. Barrett (Berlin: Springer-Verlag), 199–223.
Greenburg, J. E., Carlson, A. G., Kim, H., Curby, T. W., and Winsler, A. (2020). Early visual-spatial integration skills predict elementary school achievement among low-income, ethnically diverse children. Early Educ. Dev. 31, 304–322. doi: 10.1080/10409289.2019.1636353
Greenes, C., Ginsburg, H. P., and Balfanz, R. (2004). Big math for little kids. Early Child. Res. Q. 19, 159–166. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.010
Grissmer, D., Grimm, K. J., Aiyer, S. M., Murrah, W. M., and Steele, J. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: two new school readiness indicators. Dev. Psychol. 46, 1008–1017. doi: 10.1037/a0020104
Grissmer, D. W., Mashburn, A. J., Cottone, E., Chen, W. B., Brock, L. L., Murrah, W. M., et al. (2013). Play-based afterschool curriculum improves measures of executive function, visuospatial and math skills and classroom behavior for high risk K-1 children. Seattle, WA: Presented at the Society for Research in Child Development.
Groth-Marnat, G., and Teal, M. (2000). Block design as a measure of everyday spatial ability: a study of ecological validity. Percept. Mot. Skills 90, 522–526. doi: 10.2466/pms.2000.90.2.522
Gunderson, E. A., Ramirez, G., Beilock, S. L., and Levine, S. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: the role of the linear number line. Dev. Psychol. 48, 1229–1241. doi: 10.1037/a0027433
Hansel, R. R. (2021). Exploring the 3-D world: developing spatial and math skills for young children : Redleaf Press.
Hawes, Z., LeFevre, J. A., Xu, C., and Bruce, C. D. (2015). Mental rotation with tangible three-dimensional objects: a new measure sensitive to developmental differences in 4-to 8-year-old children. Mind Brain Educ. 9, 10–18. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12051
Hawes, Z., Moss, J., Caswell, B., Naqvi, S., and MacKinnon, S. (2017). Enhancing children's spatial and numerical skills through a dynamic spatial approach to early geometry instruction: effects of a 32-week intervention. Cogn. Instr. 35, 236–264. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2017.1323902
Haywood, K. M., and Getchell, N. (2019). Life span motor development. 7th Edn. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Hegarty, M., and Waller, D. (2004). A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking. Intelligence 32, 175–191. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2003.12.001
Herbers, J. E., Cutuli, J. J., Lafavor, T. L., Vrieze, D., Leibel, C., Obradović, J., et al. (2011). Direct and indirect effects of parenting on the academic functioning of young homeless children. Early Educ. Dev. 22, 77–104. doi: 10.1080/10409280903507261
Hoenisch, N., and Niggemeyer, E. (2007). Mathe-kings: Junge kinder fassen Mathematik an : Verlag Das Netz.
Hohmann, M., and Weikart, D. P. (2002). Educating young children: Active learning practices for preschool and child care. 2nd Edn. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Holmes, J., Adams, J. W., and Hamilton, C. J. (2008). The relationship between visuospatial sketchpad capacity and children’s mathematical skills. Eur. J. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 272–289. doi: 10.1080/09541440701612702
Hornung, C., Brunner, M., Reuter, R. A. P., and Martin, R. (2011). Children’s working memory: its structure and relationship to fluid intelligence. Intelligence 39, 210–221. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.002
Hraste, M., De Giorgio, A., Jelaska, P. M., Padulo, J., and Granić, I. (2018). When mathematics meets physical activity in the school-aged child: the effect of an integrated motor and cognitive approach to learning geometry. PLoS One 13:e0196024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196024
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., and Dehaene, S. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 435–448. doi: 10.1038/nrn1684
Hubbard, E. M., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., and Dehaene, S. (2009). “Numerical and spatial intuitions: a role for posterior parietal cortex?” in Cognitive biology: evolutionary and developmental perspectives on mind, brain and behavior. eds. L. Tommasi, L. Nadel, and M. A. Peterson (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 221–246.
Hudson, K. N., Ballou, H. M., and Willoughby, M. T. (2021). Short report: Improving motor competence skills in early childhood has corollary benefits for executive function and numeracy skills. Developmental Science 2021:e13071. doi: 10.1111/desc.13071
Hyde, D. C. (2011). Two systems of non-symbolic numerical cognition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 5:150. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00150
Jones, D., Innerd, A., Giles, E. L., and Azevedo, L. B. (2021). The association between physical activity, motor skills and school readiness in 4–5-year-old children in the northeast of England. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:11931. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211931
Jones, S. S., and Smith, L. B. (2002). How children know the relevant properties for generalizing object names. Dev. Sci. 5, 219–232. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00224
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., and Irwin, C. (2012). Building kindergartners’ number sense: a randomized controlled study. J. Educ. Psychol. 104, 647–660. doi: 10.1037/a0029018
Khng, K. H., and Ng, E. L. (2021). Fine motor and executive functioning skills predict maths and spelling skills at the start of kindergarten: a compensatory account. Infan. Aprend. 44, 675–718. doi: 10.1080/02103702.2021.1897232
Kim, H., Byers, A. I., Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Cottone, E. A., and Grissmer, D. W. (2016). Unique contributions of attentional control and visuomotor integration on concurrent teacher-reported classroom functioning in early elementary students. Early Child. Res. Q. 36, 379–390. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.018
Kim, H., Duran, C. A. K., Cameron, C. E., and Grissmer, D. (2018). Developmental relations among motor and cognitive processes and mathematics skills. Child Dev. 89, 476–494. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12752
Kim, H., Murrah, W. M., Cameron, C. E., Brock, L. L., Cottone, E. A., and Grissmer, D. (2015). Psychometric properties of the teacher-reported motor skills rating scale. J. Psychoeduc. Assess. 33, 640–651. doi: 10.1177/0734282914551536
Kimmel, S. R., and Ratliff-Schaub, K. (2011). “Growth and development” in Textbook of family medicine. ed. R. E. Rakel . 8th ed (Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier), 421–441.
Kokstejn, J., Musálek, M., and Tufano, J. J. (2017). Are sex differences in fundamental motor skills uniform throughout the entire preschool period? PLoS One 12:e0176556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176556
Korkman, M., Kirk, U., and Kemp, S. (1998). NEPSY: a developmental neuropsychological assessment : Psychological Corp.
Lauer, J. E., and Lourenco, S. F. (2016). Spatial processing in infancy predicts both spatial and mathematical aptitude in childhood. Psychol. Sci. 27, 1291–1298. doi: 10.1177/0956797616655977
Lee, J. (2010). Exploring kindergarten teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge of mathematics. Int. J. Early Child. 42, 27–41. doi: 10.1007/s13158-010-0003-9
Lefevre, J. A., Berrigan, L., Vendetti, C., Kamawar, D., Bisanz, J., Skwarchuk, S. L., et al. (2013). The role of executive attention in the acquisition of mathematical skills for children in grades 2 through 4. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 114, 243–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.005
LeFevre, J. A., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S. L., Smith-Chant, B. L., Bisanz, J., Kamawar, D., et al. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Dev. 81, 1753–1767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x
Link, T., Moeller, K., Huber, S., Fischer, U., and Nuerk, H. (2013). Walk the numberline an embodied training of numerical concepts. Trends Neurosci. Educ. 2, 74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.005
Logan, S. W., Robinson, L. E., Wilson, A. E., and Lucas, W. A. (2012). Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 38, 305–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x
Lopes, L., Santos, R., Pereira, B., and Lopes, V. P. (2013). Associations between gross motor coordination and academic achievement in elementary school children. Hum. Mov. Sci. 32, 9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2012.05.005
Luo, Z., Jose, P., Huntsinger, C., and Pigott, T. (2007). Fine motor skills and mathematics achievement in east Asian American and European American kindergartners and first graders. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 25, 595–614. doi: 10.1348/026151007X185329
Macdonald, K., Milne, N., Orr, R., and Pope, R. (2018). Relationships between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in school-aged children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, 1–28. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081603
Macdonald, K., Milne, N., Orr, R., and Pope, R. (2020). Associations between motor proficiency and academic performance in mathematics and reading in year 1 school children: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pediatr. 20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8
Magistro, D., Bardaglio, G., and Rabaglietti, E. (2015). Gross motor skills and academic achievement in typically developing children: the mediating effect of ADHD related behaviours. Cogn. Brain Behav. 19, 149–163,
Malambo, C., Nová, A., Clark, C., and Musálek, M. (2022). Associations between fundamental movement skills, physical fitness, motor competency, physical activity, and executive functions in pre-school age children: a systematic review. Children 9:1059. doi: 10.3390/children9071059
Manfra, L., Squires, C., Dinehart, L., Bleiker, C., Hartman, S., and Winsler, A. (2017). Preschool writing and premathematics predict grade 3 achievement for low-income, ethnically diverse children. J. Educ. Res. 110, 528–537. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2016.1145095
Marr, D., Cermak, S., Cohn, E. S., and Henderson, A. (2003). Fine motor activities in head start and kindergarten classrooms. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 57, 550–557. doi: 10.5014/ajot.57.5.550
Mata, R., von Helversen, B., and Rieskamp, J. (2011). When easy comes hard: the development of adaptive strategy selection. Child Dev. 82, 687–700. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01535.x
McWayne, C. M., Fantuzzo, J. W., and McDermott, P. A. (2004). Preschool competency in context: an investigation of the unique contribution of child competencies to early academic success. Dev. Psychol. 40, 633–645. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.4.633
Memisevic, H., and Hadzic, S. (2013). Development of fine motor coordination and visual-motor integration in preschool children. J. Spec. Educ. Rehabil. 14, 45–53. doi: 10.2478/v10215-011-0032-4
Meyer, M. L., Salimpoor, V. N., Wu, S. S., Geary, D. C., and Menon, V. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learn. Individ. Differ. 20, 101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.004
Mix, K. S., and Cheng, Y. L. (2012). The relation between space and math: developmental and educational implications. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 42, 197–243. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394388-0.00006-X
Mix, K. S., Levine, S., Cheng, Y.-L., Young, C., Hambrick, D., Ping, R., et al. (2016). Separate but correlated: the latent structure of space and mathematics across development. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145, 1206–1227. doi: 10.1037/xge0000182
Moss, J., Bruce, C. D., Caswell, B., Flynn, T., and Hawes, Z. (2016). Taking shape: activities to develop geometric and spatial thinking: grades K-2. Toronto, ON: Pearson Canada.
Moss, J., Hawes, Z., Naqvi, S., and Caswell, B. (2015). Adapting Japanese lesson study to enhance the teaching and learning of geometry and spatial reasoning in early years classrooms: a case study. ZDM Math. Educ. 47, 377–390. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0679-2
Mujkic, A., and Papric, Z. (2013). The influence of the exercises of gross and fine motor skills on visuo-motor coordination of the cerebral palsy children. Hum. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 3, 19–22. doi: 10.21554/hrr.091301
Mullet, E., and Paques, P. (1991). The height + width = area of a rectangle rule in five-year olds: effects of stimulus distribution and graduation of the response scale. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 52, 336–343. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(91)90067-3
Naqvi, S., Hawes, Z., Chang, D., and Moss, J. (2013). “Exploring pentominoes in 7 diverse pre-k/K classrooms” in Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. eds. M. Martinez and A. Castro Superfine (Chicago, IL: University of Illinois at Chicago).
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2006). Curriculum focal points for prekindergarten through grade 8 mathematics: a quest for coherence. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Research Council (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: paths toward excellence and equity. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nesbitt, K. T., Fuhs, M. W., and Farran, D. C. (2019). Stability and instability in the co-development of mathematics, executive function skills, and visual-motor integration from prekindergarten to first grade. Early Child. Res. Q. 46, 262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.003
Newcombe, N. S., and Frick, A. (2010). Early education for spatial intelligence: why,what, and how. Mind Brain Educ. 4, 102–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-228X.2010.01089.x
Newcombe, N. S., Uttal, D. H., and Sauter, M. (2013). “Spatial development” in Oxford handbook of developmental psychology. ed. P. D. Zelazo (Oxford University Press). 564–590.
Nosworthy, N., Bugden, S., Archibald, L., Evans, B., and Ansari, D. (2013). A two-minute paper-and-pencil test of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude processing explains variability in primary school children’s arithmetic competence. PLoS One 8:e67918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067918
Oberer, N., Gashaj, V., and Roebers, C. M. (2017). Motor skills in kindergarten: internal structure, cognitive correlates and relationships to background variables. Hum. Mov. Sci. 52, 170–180. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2017.02.002
Osborn, A., Butler, N., and Morris, A. (1984). The social life of Britain’s five year olds: a report of the child health and education study. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Osorio-Valencia, E., Torres-Sánchez, L., López-Carrillo, L., Rothenberg, S. J., and Schnaas, L. (2017). Early motor development and cognitive abilities among Mexican preschoolers. Child Neuropsychol. 24, 1015–1025. doi: 10.1080/09297049.2017.1354979
Pagani, L., Fitzpatrick, C., Archambault, I., and Janosz, M. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: a French Canadian replication and extension. Dev. Psychol. 46, 984–994. doi: 10.1037/a0018881
Parsons, S., and Bynner, J. (2005). Does numeracy matter more? London: National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy.
Parush, S., and Hahn-Markowitz, J. (1997). A comparison of two settings for group treatment in promoting perceptual-motor function of learning disabled children. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 17, 45–57. doi: 10.1080/J006v17n01_03
Passolunghi, M. C., and Mammarella, I. C. (2012). Selective spatial working memory impairment in a group of children with mathematics learning disabilities and poor problem-solving skills. J. Learn. Disabil. 45, 341–350. doi: 10.1177/0022219411400746
Payne, V. G., and Isaacs, L. D. (2012). Human motor development. Mc Graw Hill-Connect Learn Succeed, McGraw-Hill Education.
Pic, M., Navarro-Adelantado, V., and Jonsson, G. K. (2018). Detection of ludic patterns in two triadic motor games and differences in decision complexity. Front. Psychol. 8:2259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02259
Pic, M., Navarro-Adelantado, V., and Jonsson, G. K. (2020). Gender differences in strategic behavior in a triadic persecution motor game identified through an observational methodology. Front. Psychol. 11:109. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00109
Piek, J. P., Baynam, G. B., and Barrett, N. C. (2006). The relationship between fine and gross motor ability, self-perceptions and self-worth in children and adolescents. Hum. Mov. Sci. 25, 65–75. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.011
Pruden, S. M., Levine, S. C., and Huttenlocher, J. (2011). Children's spatial thinking: does talk about the spatial world matter? Dev. Sci. 14, 1417–1430. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x
Puranik, C. S., and Lonigan, C. J. (2012). Name-writing proficiency, not length of name, is associated with preschool children's emergent literacy skills. Early Child. Res. Q., 27, 284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.09.003
Rasberry, N. C., Lee, S. M., Robin, L., Laris, B. A., Russell, L. A., Coyle, K. K., et al. (2011). The association between school-based physical activity, including physical education, and academic performance: a systematic review of the literature. Prev. Med. 52, S10–S20. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.01.027
Ratzon, N. Z., Efraim, D., and Bart, O. (2007). A short-term graphomotor program for improving writing readiness skills of first-grade students. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 61, 399–405. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.4.399
Ratzon, N. Z., Lahav, O., Cohen-Hamsi, S., Metzger, Y., Efraim, D., and Bart, O. (2009). Comparing different short-term service delivery methods of visual-motor treatment for first grade students in mainstream schools. Res. Dev. Disabil. 30, 1168–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.008
Ritchie, S. J., and Bates, T. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1301–1308. doi: 10.1177/0956797612466268
Rittle-Johnson, B., Zippert, E. L., and Boice, K. L. (2019). The roles of patterning and spatial skills in early mathematics development. Early Child Res. Q. 46, 166–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.006
Robinson, L. E., Stodden, D. F., Barnett, L. M., Lopes, V. P., Logan, S. W., Rodrigues, L. P., et al. (2015). Motor competence and its effect on positive developmental trajectories of health. Sports Med. 45, 1273–1284. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0351-6
Robinson, L. E., Webster, E. K., Logan, S., Lucas, W. A., and Barber, L. T. (2012). Exploring preschoolers’ engagement and perceived physical competence in an autonomy-based object control skill intervention: a preliminary study. Eur. Phys. Educ. Rev. 19, 302–314. doi: 10.1177/1356336x13495627
Roebers, C. M., and Kauer, M. (2009). Motor and cognitive control in a normative sample of 7-year-olds. Dev. Sci. 12, 175–181. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00755.x
Roebers, C. M., Röthlisberger, M., Neuenschwander, R., Cimeli, P., Michel, E., and Jäger, K. (2014). The relation between cognitive and motor performance and their relevance for children's transition to school: a latent variable approach. Hum. Mov. Sci. 33, 284–297. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.08.011
Sarama, J., and Clements, D. H. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Child. Res. Q. 19, 181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.01.014
Sarama, J., Clements, D. H., and Vukelic, E. B. (1996). The role of a computer manipulative in fostering specific psychological/mathematical processes. in Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (2)eds. E. Jakubowski, D. Watkins, and H. Biske, Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, 567–572.
Sarnecka, B. W., and Carey, S. (2008). How counting represents number: what children must learn and when they learn it. Cognition 108, 662–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.05.007
Silva, I., Marques, L., Mata, L., and Rosa, M. (2016). Orientações curriculares para a educação pré-escolar. Lisboa: Ministério da Educação.
Skagerlund, K., and Träff, U. (2016). Processing of space, time, and number contributes to mathematical abilities above and beyond domain-general cognitive abilities. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 143, 85–101. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.10.016
Smith, L. (2005). Cognition as a dynamic system: principles from embodiment. Dev. Rev. 25, 278–298. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2005.11.001
Son, S. H., and Meisels, S. J. (2006). The relationship of young children’s motor skills to later reading and math achievement. Merrill Palmer Q. 52, 755–778. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2006.0033
Sortor, J. M., and Kulp, M. T. (2003). Are the results of the beery-buktenica developmental test of visual-motor integration and its subtests related to achievement test scores? Optom. Vis. Sci. 80, 758–763. doi: 10.1097/00006324-200311000-00013
Soylu, F., and Newman, S. D. (2016). Anatomically ordered tapping interferes more with one-digit addition than two-digit addition: a dual-task fMRI study. Cogn. Process. 17, 67–77. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0737-2
Spodek, B. (2002). Manual de Investigação em Educação de Infância. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
St Clair-Thompson, H. L., and Gathercole, S. E. (2006). Executive functions and achievements in school: shifting, updating, inhibition, and working memory. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 59, 745–759. doi: 10.1080/17470210500162854
Starr, A., Libertus, M. E., and Brannon, E. M. (2013). Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18116–18120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302751110
Suggate, S., Pufke, E., and Stoeger, H. (2018). Do fine motor skills contribute to early reading development? J. Res. Read. 41, 1–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12081
Suggate, S., Stoeger, H., and Fischer, U. (2017). Finger-based numerical skills link fine motor skills to numerical development in preschoolers. Percept. Mot. Skills 124, 1085–1106. doi: 10.1177/0031512517727405
Szucs, D., Devine, A., Soltesz, F., Nobes, A., and Gabriel, F. (2013). Developmental dyscalculia is related to visuo-spatial memory and inhibition impairment. Cortex 49, 2674–2688. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.06.007
Taylor, H. A., and Hutton, A. (2013). Think3d!: training spatial thinking fundamental to STEM education. Cogn. Instr. 31, 434–455. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2013.828727
Tseng, M., and Chow, S. (2000). Perceptual motor function of school-aged children with slow handwriting speed. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 54, 83–88. doi: 10.5014/ajot.54.1.83
Uttal, D. H., and Cohen, C. A. (2012). Spatial thinking and STEM education: when, why and how. Psychol. Learn. Motiv. 57, 147–181. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394293-7.00004-2
Uttal, D. H., Meadow, N. G., Tipton, E., Hand, L. L., Alden, A. R., Warren, C., et al. (2013). The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. Psychol. Bull. 139, 352–402. doi: 10.1037/a0028446
van der Fels, I. M., Te Wierike, S. C., Hartman, E., Elferink-Gemser, M. T., Smith, J., and Visscher, C. (2015). The relationship between motor skills and cognitive skills in 4-16 year old typically developing children: a systematic review. J. Sci. Med. Sport 18, 697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.09.007
Van Wyk, Y., Pienaar, A. E., and Coetzee, D. (2020). Relationship between academic achievement, visual-motor integration, gender and socio-economic status: north-west child health integrated with learning and development study. S. Afr. J. Childh. Educ. 10, 1–11. doi: 10.4102/sajce.v10i1.646
Verdine, B. N., Golinkoff, R. M., Hirsh-Pasek, K., and Newcombe, N. S. (2017). I. Spatial skills, their development, and their links to mathematics. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 82, 7–30. doi: 10.1111/mono.12280
Verdine, B. N., Irwin, C. M., Golinkoff, R. M., and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2014). Contributions of executive function and spatial skills to preschool mathematics achievement. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 126, 37–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.012
Von Aster, M. G., and Shalev, R. S. (2007). Number development and developmental dyscalculia. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 49, 868–873. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00868.x
Wang, X. Q., Chen, H. X., Ma, H. J., Guo, X. R., and Cui, X. H. (2015). Investigation on gross motor development of preschool children and analysis of influencing factors. Chin. J. Child Health Care 23, 188–191,
Wang, R. F., and Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: insights from animals. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 376–382. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01961-7
Wassenberg, R., Kessels, A. G. H., Kalff, A. C., Hurks, P. P. M., Jolles, J., Feron, F. J. M., et al. (2005). Relation between cognitive and motor performance in 5- to 6-year-old children- results from a large-scale cross-sectional study. Child Dev. 76, 1092–1103.
Weisberg, D. S., and Zosh, J. M. (2018). “How guided play promotes early childhood learning” in Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development. eds. R. E. Tremblay, M. Boivin, and R. Peters (Montreal: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development and Strategic Knowledge Cluster on Early Child Development), 1–4.
Wilson, R. A., and Foglia, L. (2011). “Embodied cognition” in The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. ed. E. N. Zalta . (Fall 2011 Edition). Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2011/entries/embodied-cognition
Wynn, K. (1992). Children’s acquisition of the number words and the counting system. Cogn. Dev. 24, 220–251. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(92)90008-P
Yu, Y., Shafto, P., Bonawitz, E., Yang, S. C. H., Golinkoff, R. M., Corriveau, K. H., et al. (2018). The theoretical and methodological opportunities afforded by guided play with young children. Front. Psychol. 9:1152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01152
Zebian, S. (2005). Linkages between number concepts, spatial thinking, and directionality of writing: the SNARC effect and the REVERSE SNARC effect in English and Arabic monoliterates, biliterates, and illiterate Arabic speakers. J. Cogn. Cult. 5, 165–190. doi: 10.1163/1568537054068660
Zhang, Y., Cai, G. L., Zhao, C. Q., Wang, C. X., and Wang, D. D. (2019). Research progress of children’s motor development from the perspective of human motor development. Sichuan Sports Sci. 38, 37–39. doi: 10.13932/j.cnki.sctykx.2019.02.09
Zhang, X., and Lin, D. (2015). Pathways to arithmetic: the role of visual–spatial and language skills in written arithmetic, arithmetic word problems, and nonsymbolic arithmetic. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 41, 188–197. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.01.005
Keywords: pre-school, mathematical skills, visuomotor integration skills, spatial skills, gross motor skills
Citation: Flores P, Coelho E, Mourão-Carvalhal MI and Forte P (2024) Motor activities to improve maths performance in pre-school children with typical development. Front. Psychol. 15:1332741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332741
Edited by:
Douglas F. Kauffman, Medical University of the Americas – Nevis, United StatesReviewed by:
Ann Dowker, University of Oxford, United KingdomBoris Banjevic, University of Montenegro, Montenegro
Copyright © 2024 Flores, Coelho, Mourão-Carvalhal and Forte. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Pedro Flores, cGVkcm8uZmxvcmVzQGlzY2Vkb3Vyby5wdA==