Plant-based diet and risk of all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: A systematic analysis was conducted to determine the relationship between a plant-based diet and all-cause mortality.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched. Two authors selected English documents from the database. Then the other two authors extracted the data and evaluated the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). This study adhered to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Project (PRISMA) and the PROSPERO Registry protocols. A mixed-effects model combined maximum adjusted estimates, with heterogeneity measured using the I² statistic. The sensitivity analysis validated the analysis’s robustness, while publication bias was assessed.

Results: The results of the meta-analysis of 14 articles revealed that a plant-based diet (PDI) can reduce cancer mortality (RR = 0.88, [95% CI 0.79–0.98], τ²: 0.02, I²: 84.71%), cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (RR = 0.81, [95% CI 0.76–0.86], τ²: 0.00, I²: 49.25%) and mortality (RR = 0.84, [95% CI 0.79–0.89], τ²: 0.01, I²: 81.99%) risk. Adherence to a healthy plant-based diet (hPDI) was negatively correlated with cancer mortality (RR = 0.91, [95% CI 0.83–0.99], τ²:0.01, I²:85.61%), CVD mortality (RR = 0.85, [95% CI 0.77–0.94], τ²: 0.02, I²: 85.13%) and mortality (RR = 0.85, [95% CI 0.80–0.90], τ²: 0.01, I²: 89.83%). An unhealthy plant-based diet (uPDI) was positively correlated with CVD mortality (RR = 1.19, [95% CI 1.07–1.32], τ²: 0.02, I²: 80.03%) and mortality (RR = 1.18, [95% CI 1.09–1.27], τ²: 0.01, I²: 89.97%) and had a certain correlation with cancer mortality (RR = 1.10, [95% CI 0.97–1.26], τ²: 0.03, I²: 93.11%). Sensitivity analysis showed no contradictory results.

Conclusion: The hPDI was negatively associated with all-cause mortality, and the uPDI was positively associated with all-cause mortality.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#loginpage.

Introduction

The 2017 Global Burden of Disease study estimated that unhealthy diets were a leading cause of death worldwide (1). According to the 2019 analysis of the global burden of disease and injury, more than 50% of mortality was attributed to chronic conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases (2). Studies have shown that adherence to a high-quality diet is associated with a reduced risk of inflammation and mortality (3). Dietary modification has been identified as one of the most important strategies for preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) at the population level (4).

A plant-based diet (PBD) refers to a pattern of eating based on plant-based foods, containing fewer or no animal products and more plant products, such as vegetables, fruits, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds (5). Research has linked plant-based diets to a lower risk of various diseases (6),including an inverse association between the intake of fruits and vegetables within a plant-based diet and the risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, cardiovascular disease, total cancer, and all-cause mortality (7). Multiple studies have also demonstrated that nut intake via a plant-based diet is inversely associated with overall CVD and all-cause mortality (8, 9). A plant-based diet contains soy foods that reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease and improve cardiometabolic health (10, 11), while some studies suggest that certain compounds in a plant-based diet may have potential in treating cancer (12).

A comprehensive review of previous studies on plant-based diets revealed that adherence to such a diet can significantly reduce the risk of CVD (13–15). Furthermore, plant-based diets have been associated with a reduction in overall mortality rates (16–18). At the same time, most studies fail to distinguish between the concepts of a vegetarian diet, plant-based diet, and Mediterranean diet, leading to contradictory results. Therefore, standardizing dietary definitions prior to research is of great value to the accuracy of data analysis in these studies. Despite this, there is currently no meta-analysis available on the relationship between plant-based diets and all-cause mortality. This study was based on the concept of the plant-based diet index proposed by Satija et al. (19). Through an integrated analysis of both domestic and foreign studies on plant-based diets and all-cause mortality, we discussed the correlations among the overall plant-based diet index (PDI), healthy plant-based diet index (hPDI), unhealthy plant-based diet index (uPDI), and all-cause mortality. This study was aimed to provide data supporting the association between a healthy plant-based diet and all-cause mortality.

Methods

Study design

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies to investigate the associations between plant-based diets and cardiovascular death, cancer-related death, and all-cause mortality. The entire process adhered to the Preferred Reporting Project for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines (20). This research program has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: Registration No. CRD42024535940) (Supplementary material S1).

Search strategy

Researches on the association between a plant-based diet and all-cause mortality were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and other databases from their establishment to July 1, 2024. The search was limited to publications in English. Both subject words and free words were used for the search. The retrieval strategy included medical subject headings (Mesh) and free-word combination designs related to exposure (“plant-based diet,” “plant,” “diet,” and “vegetarian”) and outcomes (“mortality,” “mortality rate,” “death,” “death rate,” “cardiovascular mortality” and “cancer mortality”). Additionally, a manual search of reference lists for articles on similar topics was conducted to identify potential qualifying studies. The detailed search strategies were provided in Supplementary Table S1.

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) study type: cohort study; (2) they adhered to plant-based eating patterns and were assessed based on the PDI, which refers to those who adhered best on the hPDI and uPDI; and (3) plant-based diets were associated with cardiovascular death, cancer-related death, and all-cause death as outcomes of concern.

The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) duplicate studies reporting the same cohort; (2) incomplete data leading to the inability to calculate the corresponding odds ratio(OR)/relative risk(RR)/hazard ratio(HR); (3) research focused on populations of patients with specific diseases; (4) nonrelevant exposure outcomes (such as stroke, cerebrovascular accident rates, etc.); and (5) nonrelevant study designs (such as intervention studies, case–control studies, cross-sectional studies, reviews, and meta-analyses).

Assessment of plant-based dietary patterns

Different studies have different definitions of the plant-based diet index (5, 19). This study adopted the concept of the plant-based diet index proposed by Satija et al. (19) According to this concept, plant-based diet index could be divided into overall plant diet index, healthy plant diet index, and unhealthy plant diet index. The healthy plant diet index emphasizes a greater intake of healthy plant-based foods such as whole grains, vegetables, nuts, legumes, coffee and tea (21), whereas the unhealthy plant diet index focuses on less healthy plant-based food groups, including fruit juices, sugary drinks, refined grains, potatoes and sweets/desserts, as well as animal foods such as animal fats, dairy product eggs, fish or seafood red meat and other animal foods (19). Positive scoring is applied to healthy plant foods, whereas reverse scoring is applied to animal foods and less healthy plant foods. The final score for all the components is added to obtain the total PDI score. A higher PDI score indicates better dietary quality. As one of the evaluation index for a plant-based diet, it considers both the quality of consumed plants and the intake of animal food. The application of this evaluation index in the study of plant intake and mortality can be used to comprehensively evaluate the impact of a plant diet on all-cause mortality.

Study selection

The literature screening process consisted of two steps. Initially, two authors (TJW and ZSP) conducted a thorough search for relevant literature. All identified literature was imported into EndNote X9 software, and any duplicate studies were removed both automatically and manually. Eligible studies were then identified by reviewing the title and abstract according to preestablished inclusion and exclusion criteria. The second step involved a full-text screening of uncertain studies to ultimately decide which ones would be suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In cases of disagreement during the literature selection process, discussions were held with the third author (JYJ) until a consensus was reached. See the attachment for the specific screening process.

Data extraction and quality assessment

The first author utilized standardized data collection tables to extract pertinent information from eligible studies, whereas the secondary author independently verified these data against the original article. Specifically, the extracted information included the last name and year of publication of the primary author, study name (if applicable), geographical location, study duration and mean follow-up years, specific study design, demographic characteristics (mean age, percentage of women, and BMI), sample size, number of cases and determination of exposure outcomes (cardiovascular deaths, cancer-related deaths, and all-cause mortality), dietary assessment methods, comparisons of dietary characteristics, most fully adjusted risk ratios, adjusted confounders in statistical models, and risk diseases among confounders. The final data extraction was based on a consensus between TJW and ZSP. The quality of the initially included studies was independently assessed via the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS). The NOS consists of eight items in three dimensions (selection, comparability, and outcome), with a maximum score of nine points for each study: four points for selection criteria, two points for comparability criteria, and three points for outcome evaluation. Studies with scores ranging from 0–3, 4–6, and 7–9 are considered low quality, medium quality, and high quality, respectively. See the annex for the specific NOS rating in Supplementary Table S2.

Data synthesis and analysis

To investigate the associations between a plant-based diet and cardiovascular death, cancer-related death, and all-cause mortality, we conducted a meta-analysis of multivariate adjusted RR or OR from each study via Stata 16. HR were considered equivalent to RR. We also calculated aggregated risk estimates for the highest and lowest adherence to plant-based dietary patterns (22). Heterogeneity among studies was assessed via I² statistics and visually represented with forest plots. A value of I² ≤ 50% indicated significant heterogeneity, whereas I² > 50% indicated insignificant heterogeneity. If significant heterogeneity was present, we used a random effects model; otherwise, a fixed effect model was employed. To assess the significance of RR differences and potential residual confounding factors, we performed a “leave one out” sensitivity analysis by iteratively removing one study at a time to evaluate its impact on the overall effect estimate. Additionally, we utilized Egger’s test to examine potential publication bias in studies with ten or more included publications and to determine its influence on the overall results.

Results

Table 1 presents the characteristics of the eligible studies; A total of 14 articles with NOS scores greater than 7 were included in the analysis, two of which provided multiple risk estimates due to stratification. The 14 articles collectively involved 976,396 participants, with sample sizes ranging from 1,404 to 315,919 in the included studies (Figure 1). Seven articles focused on cancer-related deaths (1, 16, 23–27), eight articles focused on cardiovascular death (1, 16, 23, 24, 26–29), and fourteen articles focused on all-cause deaths (1, 16, 23–33). A systematic review was conducted to analyse the correlations between the PDI, hPDI and uPDI and mortality-related outcomes. The summary results indicated that adherence to a high level of a healthy plant-based diet was associated with lower mortality, whereas adherence to an unhealthy plant-based diet was associated with higher mortality. Some results showed significant heterogeneity, and subgroup analysis suggested that geographic region, type of BMI classification of the plant-based diet and follow-up interval may be sources of heterogeneity between studies (Table 2).

Table 1

Table 1. Basic research characteristics.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Figure shows the flow chart. It mainly reflects the process of literature retrieval and exclusion.

Table 2

Table 2. Subgroup analysis of plant-based diets and cardiovascular mortality, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality.

Cancer mortality

Eight studies, reported across seven articles, investigated the associations between PDI, hPDI, uPDI, and cancer mortality (Figure 2). The pooled results indicated that PDI is associated with a reduced risk of cancer mortality (RR = 0.88, [95% CI 0.78–0.98], τ²: 0.02, I²: 84.71%) (Supplementary Figure S1). Furthermore, hPDI was negatively correlated with cancer mortality (RR = 0.91, [95% CI 0.83–0.99], τ²: 0.01, I²: 85.61%) (Supplementary Figure S2), albeit with high interstudy heterogeneity observed in the results. On the other hand, uPDI was associated with the risk of cancer mortality (RR = 1.10, [95% CI 0.97–1.26], τ²: 0.03, I²: 93.11%) (Supplementary Figure S3).

Figure 2

Figure 2. Forest plot of the summary analysis of cancer mortality rates and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI data. The forest plot displays the meta-analysis of cancer and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval. The area of each square is inversely proportional to the variance of the estimated log RR (i.e., weight percentage), whereas the horizontal line represents the 95% CI for each individual study. The vertical axis of the red diamond represents the point estimate of the overall RR, with the horizontal axis representing the 95% CI. The vertical solid line indicates RR = 1.

CVD mortality

Nine studies, reported across eight articles, investigated the associations between PDI, hPDI, uPDI, and cardiovascular mortality (Figure 3). The pooled results showed that PDI can reduce the risk of CVD mortality (RR = 0.81, [95% CI 0.76–0.86], τ²: 0.00, I²:49.25%) (Supplementary Figure S4), with low heterogeneity between studies. Furthermore, hPDI was negatively associated with CVD mortality (RR = 0.85, [95% CI 0.77–0.94], τ²: 0.02, I²: 85.13%) (Supplementary Figure S5), although there was high heterogeneity present in the results for this parameter. On the other hand, uPDI was associated with an increased risk of CVD mortality (RR = 1.19, [95% CI 1.07–1.32], τ²: 0.02, I²: 80.03%) (Supplementary Figure S6), with high heterogeneity observed across the studies.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Forest plot of cardiovascular mortality and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI data classification and summary analysis. The forest plot displays the meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval. The area of each square is proportional to the inverse of the variance of the estimated log RR (i.e., weight percentage), whereas the horizontal line represents the 95% CI for each individual study. The vertical solid line indicates RR = 1. The red diamond on the y-axis represents the point estimate of the overall RR, with the x-axis representing the 95% CI.

All mortality

The combined findings from 15 studies, reported in 14 articles, on PDI, hPDI, uPDI, and all-cause mortality indicated that PDI was associated with a reduction in overall mortality (RR = 0.84, [95% CI 0.79–0.89], τ²:0.01, I²: 81.99%) (Figure 4). There was substantial heterogeneity among the studies. Sensitivity analysis revealed no conflicting results, indicating a significant negative correlation between the PDI score and overall mortality (Supplementary Figure S7). Similarly, hPDI was associated with a reduction in overall mortality (RR = 0.85, [95% CI 0.80–0.90], τ²: 0.01, I²: 89.83%) (Supplementary Figure S8), with high heterogeneity among the studies as well as no contradictory results from the sensitivity analysis, suggesting a significant negative correlation between hPDI and all-cause mortality. On the other hand, uPDI resulted in an increased risk of overall mortality (RR = 1.18, [95% CI 1.09–1.27], τ²:0.01, I²:89.97%) (Supplementary Figure S9), with high heterogeneity between studies and no conflicting results from the sensitivity analysis, indicating a significant positive association between uPDI and all-cause mortality.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Forest plot for the meta-analysis of overall mortality and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI. The forest plot displays the meta-analysis of overall mortality and PDI, hPDI, and uPDI. RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval. The area of each square is proportional to the reciprocal of the variance of the estimated log RR (i.e., weight percentage), whereas the horizontal line represents the 95% CI for each individual study. The vertical solid line indicates RR = 1. The red diamond on the y-axis represents the point estimate of the overall RR, with the x-axis representing the 95% CI.

Subgroup analysis

To further assessed the correlation between covariate factors and the results, we conducted a stratified analysis of the results on the basis of country, region, age proportion of the female population, and follow-up time. Detailed information is shown in Table 2.

In the hPDI analysis, most studies originated from the United States, with fewer contributions from other regions. Future research should focus on increasing studies from diverse regions to provide more comprehensive data. Subgroup analysis by age revealed significant differences across all three mortality outcomes. High levels of hPDI were not associated with cancer death in individuals older than 55 years (RR_>55 = 0.90 [95% CI 0.78–1.03]), whereas high levels of hPDI were not associated with cardiovascular death in those aged 55 years or younger (RR_≤55 = 0.94 [95% CI 0.80–1.10]). The protective effect of high levels of hPDI on all-cause death was more pronounced in individuals older than 55 years (RR_≤55 = 0.90 [95% CI 0.84–0.96], RR_>55 = 0.82 [95% CI 0.75–0.90]). Importantly, sample size may impact study accuracy; for populations ≤100,000, the protective effect of high hPDI on cancer death and CVD is not evident, and the difference is not statistically significant. The sex ratio had a greater impact on deaths from different factors; there was a consistent trend showing that the protective effect of high levels of hRDI was slightly reduced when analysing populations where women comprised more than 50% of the population (cancer mortality: RR_female > 50% = 0.93 [95% CI 0.89–0.97]; CVD mortality: RR_female > 50% = 0.88 [95% CI 0.78–0.99]. All mortality: RR_female > 50% = 0.88 [95% CI 0.85–0.92]). Finally, stratified analysis based on follow-up time suggested that follow-up duration may be a source of heterogeneity: analyses with more than 8 years of follow-up exhibited significantly lower heterogeneity and higher pooled estimates than those with shorter follow-up periods, while also demonstrating narrower confidence intervals and more stable outcomes in cancer mortality and all-cause mortality analyses.

In the analysis of uPDI, the impact of uPDI on cancer mortality was found to be minimal, with statistically significant differences observed in only a few cases. Significant differences were observed across the age subgroups for all three mortality outcomes, and there was a significant association between uPDI and the risk of cancer mortality in individuals aged ≤55 years (RR = 1.18, [95% CI 1.02–1.36]). Conversely, uPDI had a more pronounced effect on the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality (RR = 1.19, [95% CI 1.06–1.34]) and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.18, [95% CI 1.08–1.29]) in those aged >55 years. The statistical results indicated that sample size did not have a significant effect on the findings of the study. Subgroup analysis on the basis of the uPDI sex ratio revealed that adverse effects of uPDI were more prominent in analyses where the risk of all-cause mortality was greater than 50% female (RR = 1.14, [95% CI 1.06–1.22]). Additionally, a shorter follow-up time (≤8 years) intensified the adverse effects of uPDI on cancer, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality, with an aggregate value of RR = 1.26 [95% CI 1.04–1.54], RR = 1.41[95% CI 1.29–1.54], RR = 1.30 [95% CI 1.17–1.45].

Sensitivity analysis

Sensitivity analysis was carried out on all the results, and the results were stable with no contradictory results.

Publication bias analysis

In this study, a publication bias analysis was conducted on the results of 10 or more included studies. The analysis revealed that in the association analysis between the PDI score and overall risk of death, the data distribution in Figure 5 was approximately symmetrical and relatively concentrated. Egger test results (p = 0.720 > 0.05) indicated no significant bias. In the association analysis between hPDI and the overall risk of death, the data distribution in Figure 6 was also approximately symmetrical and relatively concentrated. Egger test results (p = 0.931 > 0.05) indicated no significant bias. Similarly, in the association analysis between uPDI and overall risk of death, the data distribution in Figure 7 was approximately symmetrical and relatively concentrated, with an Egger test result (p = 0.398 > 0.05), indicating that no significant bias was present. In this study, no significant deviation was found in the funnel plot results of the cancer and cardiovascular bias analyses, as detailed in the attachment.

Figure 5

Figure 5. PDI and all-cause mortality offset analysis data. Visual observation was used to identify the presence of publication bias. If the funnel plot shows that the majority of studies are located at the top of the “funnel” with fewer at the base and that there is approximate symmetry on both sides, it suggests that publication bias is not significant. Conversely, if there is an obvious asymmetry, it indicates a clear publication bias.

Figure 6

Figure 6. hPDI and all-cause mortality offset analysis data. Visual observation was used to identify the presence of publication bias. If the funnel plot shows that the majority of studies are located at the top of the “funnel” with fewer at the base and that there is approximate symmetry on both sides, it suggests that publication bias is not significant. Conversely, if there is an obvious asymmetry, it indicates a clear publication bias.

Figure 7

Figure 7. All-cause mortality offset analysis data. Visual observation was used to identify the presence of publication bias. If the funnel plot shows that the majority of studies are located at the top of the “funnel” with fewer at the base and that there is approximate symmetry on both sides, it suggests that publication bias is not significant. Conversely, if there is an obvious asymmetry, it indicates a clear publication bias.

Discussion

Adherence to the hPDI is a dietary measure that emphasizes increased consumption of nutritious plant-based foods, such as whole grains, vegetables, nuts, legumes, coffee, and tea (21). Researches have demonstrated that plant-based diets are associated with significantly lower modifiable risk factors, including body mass index (BMI), blood glucose levels, inflammation, blood pressure, cardiometabolic risk status, reduced risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and decreased liver fat content (21, 34–38). Our analysis also revealed that high adherence to a plant-based diet has a substantial preventive effect on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cancer mortality. Furthermore, this preventive effect might be more pronounced in individuals over 55 years old. These findings were consistent with those of previous studies (3). As individuals age, changes in heart function, such as increased blood pressure and the onset of arrhythmias, may occur, elevating cardiovascular risk (39). Moreover, studies have indicated that older individuals are at a higher risk of developing cancer (40). A plant-based diet contains many components known to have beneficial effects on inflammation, cellular redox, metabolic processes, and endothelial function. Some studies have shown that certain components of a healthy plant-based diet have anticancer effects (41). Additionally, dietary fiber in a plant-based diet can reduce levels of inflammatory markers (42, 43), which may enhance the responsiveness of older individuals to the benefits of a healthy plant-based diet. Interestingly, in the subgroup analysis based on the sex ratio, compliance with hPDI might have a more significant protective effect on men. Compared with women, men generally tended to engage in more intense work and exercise and prefer diets high in fat and meat. These factors could lead to an increase in cardiovascular and cellular inflammation. Adherence to hPDI results in a diet rich in dietary fiber, antioxidants, unsaturated fats, and micronutrients, while being low in saturated fats and heme iron. This dietary pattern can enhance human metabolism, thereby reducing the risk of coronary heart disease (44), which may explain the differences observed in the protective effects of hPDI between sexes.

uPDI is a dietary index for a group with a less healthy intake of plant-based foods and an animal-based diet (19). Previous studies have shown that uPDI is associated with a greater risk of NAFLD and intrahepatic steatosis (21), and other studies have shown that uPDI is linked to an increased risk of chronic disease and mortality. In this study, we observed a significant positive correlation between the use of uPDI and cardiovascular mortality as well as all-cause mortality. This correlation may be more pronounced in individuals over the age of 55. Overweight and obesity currently represent the fifth leading cause of death globally, with obesity contributing to increased prevalence, morbidity, and premature mortality of associated diseases (45). Research has indicated that obesity leads to changes in the structure and function of the heart; alterations in heart muscle structure increase the risk of atrial fibrillation and sudden cardiac death (46). Additionally, uPDI contributes to a high glycemic index and load, decreased fibre content, low micronutrient content, and high caloric content (47), which may promote weight gain. For older individuals, vascular endothelial function decreases while inflammation levels increase; This weakening vascular elasticity further increases the risk of CVD, among other conditions. Furthermore, our analysis revealed another noteworthy result: in a subgroup analysis based on follow-up time, high-level study results demonstrated that uPDI had a more significant adverse effect on participants followed for less than 8 years. This might be attributed to the fact that an unhealthy plant-based diet has a substantial short-term impact on the human body. This could be related to the strong link between the gut microbiota and metabolic health (48). High-fat intake may promote hyperorexia by increasing mucosal permeability and toll-like receptor activation, which stimulates innate immune responses (inflammasome), leading to alterations in the gut microbiome composition (49). Short-term plant-based dietary patterns may be sufficient to modify gut microbiome diversity (50). Additionally, higher levels of added sugars in an unhealthy plant-based diet may also contribute to increased energy intake through neurochemical changes in the brain (51). Multiple animal studies have demonstrated that a high-fat intake can disrupt energy balance by providing excess energy, leading to hypothalamic damage and impairing the hypothalamus’s normal functions of nutritional sensing and energy regulation (52, 53). These disruptions may cause changes in disease incidence and mortality over a short period. Such mechanisms could explain the pronounced short-term effects of uPDI on the human body.

Actual impact

This study aimed to systematically analyze all available research assessing the associations between plant-based diets and all-cause mortality. A total of 14 articles were included in the analysis, comprising 15 studies on overall mortality risk, 9 studies on cardiovascular mortality, and 8 studies on cancer mortality. These results suggest a significant association between plant-based diets and reduced all-cause mortality, indicating that adherence to a healthy plant-based diet lowers the risk of death.

Advantage

This study represented the first meta-analysis examining all-cause mortality, cancer mortality, and CVD mortality using standardized plant-based diet scores. The analysis investigated the associations between PDI, hPDI, and uPDI and the three types of death. By integrating the analysis of plant-based diets, this study aimed to reduce heterogeneity resulting from differences in dietary patterns. All included studies were cohort studies with high-quality literature, ensuring the reliability of the analysis results. These findings effectively confirmed a correlation between plant-based dietary patterns and various health outcomes. Subgroup analysis was utilized for pooled analyses with high heterogeneity to identify sources of partial heterogeneity, such as duration of follow-up, age, region, proportion of female participants, and total number of study cases.

Limitations

The review in this study was systematic and exhaustive, drawing conclusions about the various causes of death and different plant-based diets. The studies included a total of 976,396 participants, providing a large sample size that offered evidence to detect a statistically significant relationship between plant-based diets and all-cause mortality. However, there are several limitations to this analysis. First, while the current meta-analysis involves a sufficient sample size for the overall analysis, the occurrence of diseases is closely related to region and age. Currently, there are too few original articles involving relevant factors such as region and average age, leading to some bias in the results. In the future, it is necessary to increase the research of multi-region and multi-species. Second, there may be small study effects that threaten the validity of the meta-analysis results. We used various methods to evaluate publication bias (the main cause of the small-scale study effect), including visually assessing funnel plot asymmetry and conducting Egger regression tests (p = 0.000 < 0.05), indicating that possible publication bias exists. Therefore, we further processed the asymmetric funnel plot via the shear compensation method, which revealed that our analysis was stable and not affected by publication bias. Owing to the limited number of included studies, publication bias has little significance in some analyses; however, additional relevant studies are needed to address this issue comprehensively. Finally, due to the limited availability of subgroup data, further sources of heterogeneity could not be identified, such as pooled analyses comparing cancer mortality with CVD mortality. Additionally, owing to the relative lack of data from studies involving different levels of exposure to plant-based diets, we were unable to perform dose–response analyses to obtain more detailed results.

Conclusion

A plant-based diet plays a crucial role in promoting public health by reducing the risk of chronic diseases and premature death. The findings from the data analysis indicated that adhering to a high-level healthy plant-based diet is linked to lower mortality rates, whereas greater adherence to an unhealthy plant-based diet is associated with higher mortality rates. Therefore, it was important to prioritize healthy plant-based foods and limit the consumption of less healthy plant-based foods and certain animal-based foods to achieve significant health benefits.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

JT: Writing – original draft. SZ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. YJ: Data curation, Writing – original draft. JL: Writing – original draft. CY: Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

Thank you for the great contribution to the field included in the article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2024.1481363/full#supplementary-material

Supplementary TABLE S1 | Literature search strategy - displaying literature search terms.

Supplementary TABLE S2 | Newcastle - ottawa quality assessment scale.

Supplementary Figure S1 | Presents the data on the correlation between PDI and Cancer mortality.

Supplementary Figure S2 | Presents the data on the correlation between hPDI and Cancer mortality.

Supplementary Figure S3 | Presents the data on the correlation between uPDI and Cancer mortality.

Supplementary Figure S4 | Presents the data on the correlation between PDI and CVD mortality.

Supplementary Figure S5 | Presents the data on the correlation between hPDI and CVD mortality.

Supplementary Figure S6 | Presents the data on the correlation between uPDI and CVD mortality.

Supplementary Figure S7 | Presents the data on the correlation between PDI and all mortality.

Supplementary Figure S8 | Presents the data on the correlation between hPDI and all mortality.

Supplementary Figure S9 | Presents the data on the correlation between uPDI and all mortality.

Abbreviations

BMI, body mass index; CVD, cardiovascular disease; hPDI, healthy plant-based diet index; HR, Hazard ratio; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; OR, Odds ratio; PBD, plant-based diet; PDI, plant-based diet index; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Project for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis; RR, Relative risk; uPDI, unhealthy plant-based diet index.

References

1. Shan, Z, Wang, F, Li, Y, Baden, MY, Bhupathiraju, SN, Wang, DD, et al. Healthy eating patterns and risk of Total and cause-specific mortality[J]. JAMA Intern Med. (2023) 183:142–53. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019[J]. Lancet. (2020) 396:1204–22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Morze, J, Danielewicz, A, Hoffmann, G, and Schwingshackl, L. Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating index, dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: a second update of a systematic review and Meta-analysis of cohort studies[J]. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2020) 120:1998–2031.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.076

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yu, E, Malik, VS, and Hu, FB. Cardiovascular disease prevention by diet modification: JACC health promotion series[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2018) 72:914–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.085

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Satija, A, and Hu, FB. Plant-based diets and cardiovascular health[J]. Trends Cardiovasc Med. (2018) 28:437–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.02.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Martínez-González, MA, Sánchez-Tainta, A, Corella, D, Salas-Salvadó, J, Ros, E, Arós, F, et al. A provegetarian food pattern and reduction in total mortality in the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) study[J]. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100:320s–8s. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.071431

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Aune, D, Giovannucci, E, Boffetta, P, Fadnes, LT, Keum, NN, Norat, T, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies[J]. Int J Epidemiol. (2017) 46:1029–56. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw319

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Luo, C, Zhang, Y, Ding, Y, Shan, Z, Chen, S, Yu, M, et al. Nut consumption and risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100:256–69. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.076109

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Eslamparast, T, Sharafkhah, M, Poustchi, H, Hashemian, M, Dawsey, SM, Freedman, ND, et al. Nut consumption and total and cause-specific mortality: results from the Golestan cohort study[J]. Int J Epidemiol. (2017) 46:75–85. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyv365

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Anderson, JW, and Major, AW. Pulses and lipaemia, short- and long-term effect: potential in the prevention of cardiovascular disease[J]. Br J Nutr. (2002) 88:263–71. doi: 10.1079/BJN2002716

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Afshin, A, Micha, R, Khatibzadeh, S, and Mozaffarian, D. Consumption of nuts and legumes and risk of incident ischemic heart disease, stroke, and diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 100:278–88. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.076901

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Naujokat, C, and Mckee, DL. The "big five" phytochemicals targeting Cancer stem cells: curcumin, EGCG, Sulforaphane, resveratrol and Genistein[J]. Curr Med Chem. (2021) 28:4321–42. doi: 10.2174/0929867327666200228110738

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Huang, T, Yang, B, Zheng, J, Li, G, Wahlqvist, ML, and Li, D. Cardiovascular disease mortality and cancer incidence in vegetarians: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. Ann Nutr Metab. (2012) 60:233–40. doi: 10.1159/000337301

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Trautwein, EA, and Mckay, S. The role of specific components of a Plant-based diet in Management of Dyslipidemia and the impact on cardiovascular risk[J]. Nutrients. (2020) 12:2671. doi: 10.3390/nu12092671

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Salehin, S, Rasmussen, P, Mai, S, Mushtaq, M, Agarwal, M, Hasan, SM, et al. Plant based diet and its effect on cardiovascular disease[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2023) 20:3337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043337

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Kim, J, Kim, H, and Giovannucci, EL. Plant-based diet quality and the risk of total and disease-specific mortality: a population-based prospective study[J]. Clin Nutr. (2021) 40:5718–25. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.10.013

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Thompson, AS, Tresserra-Rimbau, A, Karavasiloglou, N, Jennings, A, Cantwell, M, Hill, C, et al. Association of Healthful Plant-based Diet Adherence with Risk of mortality and Major chronic diseases among adults in the UK[J]. JAMA Netw Open. (2023) 6:e234714. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Baden, MY, Liu, G, Satija, A, Li, Y, Sun, Q, Fung, TT, et al. Changes in Plant-based diet quality and Total and cause-specific mortality[J]. Circulation. (2019) 140:979–91. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041014

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Satija, A, Bhupathiraju, SN, Rimm, EB, Spiegelman, D, Chiuve, SE, Borgi, L, et al. Plant-based dietary patterns and incidence of type 2 diabetes in US men and women: results from three prospective cohort studies[J]. PLoS Med. (2016) 13:e1002039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002039

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Page, MJ, McKenzie, J, Bossuyt, PM, Boutron, I, Hoffmann, TC, Mulrow, CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews[J]. BMJ. (2021) 372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Lv, Y, Rong, S, Deng, Y, Bao, W, Xia, Y, and Chen, L. Plant-based diets, genetic predisposition and risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease[J]. BMC Med. (2023) 21:351. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03028-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Dersimonian, R, and Laird, N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials[J]. Control Clin Trials. (1986) 7:177–88. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Wang, DD, Li, Y, Nguyen, XT, Song, RJ, Ho, YL, HU, FB, et al. Degree of adherence to based diet and Total and cause-specific mortality: prospective cohort study in the million veteran program[J]. Public Health Nutr. (2022) 21:1–38. doi: 10.1017/s1368980022000659

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Li, H, Zeng, X, Wang, Y, Zhang, Z, Zhu, Y, Li, X, et al. A prospective study of healthful and unhealthful plant-based diet and risk of overall and cause-specific mortality[J]. Eur J Nutr. (2022) 61:387–98. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02660-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Anyene, IC, Ergas, IJ, Kwan, ML, Roh, JM, Ambrosone, CB, Kushi, LH, et al. Plant-based dietary patterns and breast Cancer recurrence and survival in the pathways study[J]. Nutrients. (2021) 13:3374. doi: 10.3390/nu13103374

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kim, J, Wilkens, LR, Haiman, CA, le Marchand, L, and Park, SY. Plant-based dietary patterns and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: the multiethnic cohort study[J]. Clin Nutr. (2024) 43:1447–53. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2024.04.035

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Zhou, L, Zhang, R, Yang, H, Zhang, S, Zhang, Y, Li, H, et al. Association of plant-based diets with total and cause-specific mortality across socioeconomic deprivation level: a large prospective cohort[J]. Eur J Nutr. (2024) 63:835–46. doi: 10.1007/s00394-023-03317-3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Kim, H, Caulfield, LE, Garcia-Larsen, V, Steffen, LM, Coresh, J, and Rebholz, CM. Plant-based diets are associated with a lower risk of incident cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality in a general population of middle-aged adults[J]. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e012865. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012865

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Delgado-Velandia, M, Maroto-Rodríguez, J, Ortolá, R, García-Esquinas, E, Rodríguez-Artalejo, F, and Sotos-Prieto, M. Plant-based diets and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in a nationwide cohort in Spain: the ENRICA study[J]. Mayo Clin Proc. (2022) 97:2005–15. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.06.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Chen, H, Shen, J, Xuan, J, Zhu, A, Ji, JS, Liu, X, et al. Plant-based dietary patterns in relation to mortality among older adults in China[J]. Nat Aging. (2022) 2:224–30. doi: 10.1038/s43587-022-00180-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Weston, LJ, Kim, H, Talegawkar, SA, Tucker, KL, Correa, A, and Rebholz, CM. Plant-based diets and incident cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in African Americans: a cohort study[J]. PLoS Med. (2022) 19:e1003863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003863

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Wang, Q, Cui, Q, Gao, JP, and Zhao, YH. Plant-based dietary patterns and lung cancer mortality: a perspective cohort study[J]. Food Funct. (2023) 14:6470–81. doi: 10.1039/D3FO01803B

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Amir, S, Kim, H, Hu, EA, Ricardo, AC, Mills, KT, He, J, et al. Adherence to Plant-based diets and risk of CKD progression and all-cause mortality: findings from the chronic renal insufficiency cohort (CRIC) study[J]. Am J Kidney Dis. (2024) 83:624–35. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2023.09.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Bhupathiraju, SN, Sawicki, CM, Goon, S, Gujral, UP, Hu, FB, Kandula, NR, et al. A healthy plant-based diet is favorably associated with cardiometabolic risk factors among participants of south Asian ancestry[J]. Am J Clin Nutr. (2022) 116:1078–90. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac174

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Rizzo, NS, Sabaté, J, Jaceldo-Siegl, K, and Fraser, GE. Vegetarian dietary patterns are associated with a lower risk of metabolic syndrome: the adventist health study 2[J]. Diabetes Care. (2011) 34:1225–7. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1221

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Matsumoto, S, Beeson, WL, Shavlik, DJ, Siapco, G, Jaceldo-Siegl, K, Fraser, G, et al. Association between vegetarian diets and cardiovascular risk factors in non-Hispanic white participants of the Adventist health Study-2[J]. J Nutr Sci. (2019) 8:e6. doi: 10.1017/jns.2019.1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Shah, B, Newman, JD, Woolf, K, Ganguzza, L, Guo, Y, Allen, N, et al. Anti-inflammatory effects of a vegan diet versus the American Heart Association-recommended diet in coronary artery disease trial[J]. J Am Heart Assoc. (2018) 7:e011367. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011367

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Yokoyama, Y, Nishimura, K, Barnard, ND, Takegami, M, Watanabe, M, Sekikawa, A, et al. Vegetarian diets and blood pressure: a meta-analysis[J]. JAMA Intern Med. (2014) 174:577–87. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14547

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Perry, AS, Dooley, EE, Master, H, Spartano, NL, Brittain, EL, and Pettee Gabriel, K. Physical activity over the Lifecourse and cardiovascular disease[J]. Circ Res. (2023) 132:1725–40. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.123.322121

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Yancik, R, and Ries, LA. Cancer in older persons: an international issue in an aging world[J]. Semin Oncol. (2004) 31:128–36. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2003.12.024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Aune, D. Plant foods, antioxidant biomarkers, and the risk of cardiovascular disease, Cancer, and mortality: a review of the evidence[J]. Adv Nutr. (2019) 10:S404–s421. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz042

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. North, CJ, Venter, CS, and Jerling, JC. The effects of dietary fibre on C-reactive protein, an inflammation marker predicting cardiovascular disease[J]. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2009) 63:921–33. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Butcher, JL, and Beckstrand, RL. Fiber's impact on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels in cardiovascular disease[J]. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. (2010) 22:566–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00555.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Satija, A, Bhupathiraju, SN, Spiegelman, D, Chiuve, SE, Manson, JAE, Willett, W, et al. Healthful and unhealthful Plant-based diets and the risk of coronary heart disease in U.S. adults[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2017) 70:411–22. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.05.047

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Willett, WC, Dietz, WH, and Colditz, GA. Guidelines for healthy weight[J]. N Engl J Med. (1999) 341:427–34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908053410607

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Csige, I, Ujvárosy, D, Szabó, Z, Lőrincz, I, Paragh, G, Harangi, M, et al. The impact of obesity on the cardiovascular system[J]. J Diabetes Res. (2018) 2018:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2018/3407306

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Malik, VS, Popkin, BM, Bray, GA, Després, JP, Willett, WC, and Hu, FB. Sugar-sweetened beverages and risk of metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis[J]. Diabetes Care. (2010) 33:2477–83. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Asnicar, F, Berry, SE, Valdes, AM, Nguyen, LH, Piccinno, G, Drew, DA, et al. Microbiome connections with host metabolism and habitual diet from 1,098 deeply phenotyped individuals[J]. Nat Med. (2021) 27:321–32. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01183-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Elinav, E, Strowig, T, Kau, AL, Henao-Mejia, J, Thaiss, CA, Booth, CJ, et al. NLRP6 inflammasome regulates colonic microbial ecology and risk for colitis[J]. Cell. (2011) 145:745–57. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Kolodziejczyk, AA, Zheng, D, and Elinav, E. Diet-microbiota interactions and personalized nutrition[J]. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2019) 17:742–53. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0256-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Berthoud, HR. The neurobiology of food intake in an obesogenic environment[J]. Proc Nutr Soc. (2012) 71:478–87. doi: 10.1017/S0029665112000602

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Benoit, SC, Kemp, CJ, Elias, CF, Abplanalp, W, Herman, JP, Migrenne, S, et al. Palmitic acid mediates hypothalamic insulin resistance by altering PKC-theta subcellular localization in rodents[J]. J Clin Invest. (2009) 119:2577–89. doi: 10.1172/JCI36714

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Zhang, X, Zhang, G, Zhang, H, Karin, M, Bai, H, and Cai, D. Hypothalamic IKKbeta/NF-kappaB and ER stress link overnutrition to energy imbalance and obesity[J]. Cell. (2008) 135:61–73. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.043

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar