About this Research Topic

Background

The World Health Organization defines pharmacovigilance (PV) as "the science and activities relating to the detection, assessment, understanding, and prevention of adverse events or any drug-related problem." Government agencies, clinical institutions, the pharmaceutical industry, and other entities manage strict pharmacovigilance programs as vital safeguards for supporting the early detection of safety signals. Current PV practices rely primarily on expert judgment and global introspection implemented in concrete business practices specific to an organization. Computational methods and decision-support systems can help standardize these business practices by specifying the evaluation steps human reviewers follow to discover unknown adverse reactions that remained unrecognized or were not fully understood in a medical product's pre-market period. Reviewers are frequently assisted by tools and methods that automate manual steps and allow more time for the constructive review. This special topic issue is intended to describe computational and systematic approaches to make this process more precise.

A complete decision-support system must address multiple data, user-related, and other challenges. To this date, multiple efforts have delivered solutions addressing more narrowly defined tasks rather than entire workflows. For example, a few methods have been proposed to encode drugs and adverse events, prioritize case reports for clinical and regulatory review, and detect duplicates in spontaneous reporting systems. These significant challenges and tasks in pharmacovigilance are part of more extensive multi-step processes that remain untapped from a (semi-)automated decision-support perspective. To collect the requirements and design a complete decision-support system incorporating Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other sophisticated algorithms, preliminary analyses by knowledgeable interdisciplinary teams are often necessary. As with any software development, end-users active participation in the development and evaluation phases is paramount. In most cases, this is the recipe for success as long as the right expectations are set from the beginning and the proposed solutions do not bring dramatic changes to existing workflows without proven benefit. Including a "human-in-the-loop" further ensures that a system's limitations, such as its ability to classify cases for a given task or minimize duplicates accurately, are carefully examined, and a quality assurance process to control them is in place. Ultimately, as no automated solution can be perfect, specific correction strategies and considerations are required if a new workflow incorporating a decision-support system mandates separate roles for humans and machines. Assessments of algorithm performance (e.g., validity, generalizability, absence of bias, and robustness in real-world settings with changing inputs), documentation, transparency, explainability, quality control with real-world data collection and monitoring, and algorithm change control are generally considered necessary for AI systems. These approaches are also needed when considering the maturity of decision-support systems.

We invite papers on the above topics and particularly encourage submissions that describe validated methods and active systems that have already demonstrated value and made significant contributions to pharmacovigilance by improving efficiency in established business practices, minimizing manual effort, maximizing discovery of safety issues, and standardizing existing processes transparently. Research and applications, brief communications, and review articles are the main types of submissions for this Research Topic. We also welcome case studies of system implementation and perspectives that may significantly contribute to the domain.

Keywords: Decision Support, Artificial Intelligence, Quality Assurance, Decision Making, Pharmacovigilance

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

• What is a Research Topic?

  Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

  Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

• Why does Frontiers publish Research Topics? 

  The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

  Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

• Why are Research Topics important for journals?

  As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

  A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

• How do we ensure the quality of articles within Research Topics?

  Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

  In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

• What are the benefits of publishing my article in a Research Topic?

  Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

  As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

  Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

   
• What types of articles can be published in a Research Topic?

  Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

  Check available article types here 

• Can I suggest a new Research Topic? 

  Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

  Suggest your topic here 

• Who leads a Research Topic? 

  A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

  The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

• What is the role of a topic editor?

  As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

   

  You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

• What support will I receive when editing a new Research Topic? 

  As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

• As a junior researcher, can I be involved in editing a Research Topic? 

  If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

• Can I get a certificate for editing a Research Topic?

  Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

• Who will I collaborate with?

  Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

• How long does it take to publish a Research Topic?

  As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

  Find out more about our Research Topics

• What fee support is available to authors publishing in a Research Topic?

  Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

  Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

• Will there be a printed version of my Research Topic?

  In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.