Understanding the Causes of Asymmetries in Earth's Magnetosphere-Ionosphere System

It is often assumed that on average, polar ionospheric electrodynamics in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres are mirror symmetric or antisymmetric with respect to the interplanetary magnetic field By component and the dipole tilt angle ψ. For example, one might assume that the average Birkeland current density j at magnetic latitude λ is equal to the current density at magnetic latitude -λ if the signs of By and ψ are reversed and all other parameters are equal: j(λ, By, ψ, …) = j(-λ, -By, -ψ, …). This is a convenient assumption for empirical models, since it effectively doubles the amount of information that a measurement made in one hemisphere contains. In this study we use the Average Magnetic field and Polar current System (AMPS) model to quantify to what extent the assumption also holds for ionospheric currents. The AMPS model is an empirical model based on Swarm and CHAMP magnetic field measurements, with no constraints on hemispheric symmetries, and with differences in main magnetic field geometry as well as biases in data point distributions in magnetic coordinates accounted for. We show that when averaged over IMF clock angle orientation, the total ionospheric divergence-free current in each hemisphere largely satisfies the mirror symmetry assumption. The same is true for the total Birkeland current in each hemisphere except during local winter, during which the Northern Hemisphere tends to dominate. We show that this local winter asymmetry is consistent with the average winter hemispheric asymmetry in total precipitating electron current derived from Fast Auroral SnapshoT (FAST) satellite observations. We attribute this and other more subtle deviations from symmetry to differences in sunlight distribution in magnetic coordinates, as well as magnetic field strength and its influence on ionospheric conductivity. Important departures from mirror symmetry also arise for some IMF clock angle orientations, particularly those for which IMF Bz > 0, as suggested by other recent studies.

In this study, the low- and mid-latitude ionospheric response to the main phase of the 2013 St Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm in the American sector on the dayside has been investigated using the ground-based measurements and the Global Ionosphere Thermosphere Model (GITM). First, it is found that the observed ionospheric response can be well reproduced by GITM when it is driven by the electric potential and electron precipitation patterns derived from the Assimilative Mapping of Ionospheric Electrodynamics (AMIE) technique. The AMIE-driven GITM simulation also significantly improves the data-model comparison as compared with the simulation driven by the high-latitude empirical models. Second, it is found that the transport process associated with the neutral wind is largely responsible for the observed ionospheric response. Specifically, the traveling atmospheric disturbances (TADs) propagating from the opposite hemisphere play an important role in the formation of the negative storm phase at low and middle latitudes. Third, it is found that the asymmetric negative storm phases occurred at the nominal equatorial ionization anomaly (EIA) peak region in the afternoon sector are mainly attributed to the interaction of the TADs launched in different hemispheres with different phase speeds. Specifically, stronger Joule heating deposited in the northern hemisphere (NH) generates TADs with faster phase speeds than those launched in the southern hemisphere (SH). Consequently, the locations where the TADs originated from the different hemispheres interact are asymmetric about the geomagnetic equator, leading to the formation of asymmetric ionospheric negative storm phases. This study highlights the importance of accurately specifying high-latitude electrodynamic forcings in global I-T simulations and provides a new insight into the cause of the interhemispheric asymmetry phenomena during geomagnetic storms.