About this Research Topic
This Research Topic invites submissions that consider how antibiotic use is shaped by social context and the norms and practices of actors within communities. We would also be interested in papers that explore the application of social theories and methods to addressing the problem of AMR and optimising antibiotic use. We welcome researchers from diverse fields, including sociology, social psychology, clinical microbiology, economics, political science and public health. We invite submissions that address the following themes:
- Going beyond a focus on the prescriber: characterising communities of stakeholders and their roles along pathways of antibiotic use
- Using new methods to model the behaviours of communities of antibiotic prescribers or users
- Exploring social norms and collective understandings of antibiotic over-use: e.g. exploring the meanings of concepts related to antibiotics, antibiotic overuse, and ‘optimising’ antibiotic use, and how these are socially constructed
- Studying antibiotic use and AMR as a problem of large-scale collective action rather than individual behaviour change: e.g. research that addresses tensions between individual and collective interests, or explores how collective action to protect antibiotics could be promoted
- Using social science theory to design interventions that go beyond individual behaviour change: e.g. approaches to intervention development and implementation evaluation that focus on the wider context of antimicrobial stewardship
Papers that focus on low and middle-income countries, and papers that cut across traditional boundaries (e.g. human and animal health) would be particularly welcome.
Keywords: antibiotic prescribing, social theory, context, collective action, antimicrobial resistance
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.