Decolonial Perspectives on Arctic Resilience

  • 39

    Total downloads

  • 1,833

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Submission Deadline 31 March 2025

  2. This Research Topic is still accepting articles.

Background

Arctic communities face a wide variety of upheavals, from short-term shocks to long-term trends and slow-burn issues such as changes in sea ice extent and thickness, marine life, and sea levels. Climate change combined with social and economic crises, migration, and geo-political tensions lead to complex interacting disturbances, exceeding in some cases the current adaptive capacity of Arctic communities.

The concept of resilience has caught the attention of solution-oriented research with and within local communities in the Arctic. However, resilience can be interpreted in different ways. Various authors and actors highlight different aspects of resilience. Those multiple perspectives, interpretations and definitions lead to a diversity of meanings. This diversity and its consequences must be carefully taken into account when using the concept in intercultural, post-colonial, or colonial, contexts. In this call for papers, we mobilize the concept of resilience to grasp communities’ ability to tolerate disturbances and to recover to a desired state. In this Research Topic, we welcome contributions that explore how the concept of resilience is deployed in a respectful and meaningful way to understand and respond to accelerated changes in Arctic contexts. In the Arctic, multifaceted changes and disruptions are mainly analyzed using a global approach based on Western academic knowledge - mainly climate and environmental sciences - which tend to make local contexts, knowledge systems and specificities invisible (Bremer et al., 2019; Krauß, 2020). In these settings, following Meerow et al. (2016) we suggest that the use of external concepts such as resilience “might serve as a boundary object, with the acknowledgement that applying resilience in different contexts requires answering: Resilience for whom and to what? When? Where? And why?” Further, Wardekker (2016, 2018, 2020) shows that resilience is ‘framed’ in diverging ways, connected to different goals, values, policy options, knowledge & analytical approaches, and mechanisms of what makes a system or community resilient (‘resilience principles’). Resilience is therefore a concept that contains the necessity to make judgements and thus to choose who is entitled to make such judgements and why.

This necessity to include different perspectives and values requires scrutinizing whose voices are included. As Jonsson (2016, p. 1) underlined: “it is only when the indigenous attains the place of the subject telling the story that we can seriously claim to have a postcolonial narrative of the Arctic”. In Arctic regions, scientific narratives of changes tend to annihilate expressions of attachment to place, cultural values or local knowledge, and thus limit local forms of agency; for instance, the ability to make sense of one's own experiences and to act on one's own world (Nash, 2005). This limitation can be expressed in the form of epistemic injustice, where the definition of what matters (salience), who is able to participate in the production of knowledge (legitimacy) and how the results are evaluated (credibility) (Cash et al., 2003) belongs solely to scientists from ’Western’ backgrounds. In doing so, the scientific production process only reinforces pre-existing power imbalances, particularly those inherited from colonization. It is here suggested that narrative-based research, e.g., indigenous methodologies and Southern critical methodologies associated with storytelling or critical ethnography, contains the potential to nurture this much needed shift, opening up for pluralizing perspectives on resilience in a post-colonial context. Engaging a decolonial turn is therefore crucial.

Following Quijano & Ennis (2000), we seek to understand decoloniality within the close-knit relationship between the colonial condition and the imposition of a Western logic of ‘modernity’ as a consequence of colonialism. Hence, ‘decoloniality’ means to ‘delink’ ourselves from the structure of knowledge imposed by the West. This means disrupting the resilience with which Western scientific knowledge, concepts, and narrative forms shape indigenous and decolonial life-worlds (Veland et al. 2018). Place-based approaches that narrate with and within local communities - can explore resilience as a space that fosters indigenous and local agency in face of such disruption - offering salient alternatives to reform and decolonize the public discourses towards climate and environmental justice through reflexivity and the pluralization of perspectives. Indeed, this plurality fosters community resilience to climate change beyond the Arctic. This responds to a timely need and will support a fairer narration and local sovereignty on how to live in the Arctic in times of accelerated global changes.

By challenging classical and western-centered practices of Arctic climate adaptation research, this Research Topic aims to highlight inclusive and fair perspectives on resilience in the rapidly changing Arctic. We welcome contributions that constructively critique hegemonic representations of resilience that tend to make invisible what happens at the “margins” of mainstream Western science. This Research Topic is open to:

- Research adopting an explicitly decolonial approach aligned with culturally
anchored research;
- Research that helps to foster a pluralistic and fair dialogue between indigenous,
local and Western ways of knowing, Indigenous scholars with a perspective on
socio-environmental disruptions;
- Both empirical and conceptual contributions, from a regional scale;
- Disciplinary to transdisciplinary research that is qualitative and/or quantitative

Accepted contributions:
- Original Research, Mini Review, Policy and Practice Reviews, Perspective, Community Case
Study

Research Topic Research topic image

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Classification
  • Clinical Trial
  • Community Case Study
  • Curriculum, Instruction, and Pedagogy
  • Data Report
  • Editorial
  • General Commentary

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: Arctic, resilience, decolonial, narratives, reflexivity

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 1,833Topic views
  • 455Article views
  • 39Article downloads
View impact