Regulatory Science and Meta Science as Components of Regulation of Medical Products and Practices

  • 1,421

    Total downloads

  • 7,908

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission deadlines

  1. Manuscript Submission Deadline 1 June 2024 | Manuscript Extension Submission Deadline 1 July 2024

Background

Translating research into improved patient care practices and products assumes that the underlying and cumulative research is valid and reliable, with evidence of reproducibility. Increasing evidence estimates that twenty percent or higher, of research in some fields may not meet these quality criteria. If verified, such a deficit can delay progress toward the required scientifically robust evidence base and can constitute a largely undetected source of research participant/patient harm. Identifying individual scientific papers and the portion of literature so affected and retracting and/or correcting the scientific record has been extremely limited. Practices/tools to do so are emerging and will eventually become a routine element of managing bodies of scientific knowledge to an adequate level of scientific quality.

The purpose of this research topic is to link two bodies of knowledge essential to quality health care research, practices, and products – regulatory science/affairs and meta science (the study of science). Merging perspectives from regulatory science and meta science is essential to assure that the evidence base on which regulations are built and evaluated is scientifically rigorous, no matter the regulatory objective and the kind of research it prioritizes. This effort is central to scientific integrity.

The US FDA defines regulatory science as the science of developing new tools, standards and approaches to assess the safety, efficacy, quality and performance of FDA regulated products, and regulatory affairs as utilizing regulatory science to protect consumers/patients and enhance public health by ensuring timely access to safe, quality FDA regulated products. Likewise, EMA defines regulatory science as the range of scientific disciplines that are applied to the quality, safety and efficacy assessment of medicinal products and that inform regulatory decision making throughout the life cycle of a medicine. It encompasses basic and applied biomedical and social sciences and contributes to the development of regulatory standards and tools. But beyond the specific field of drug/device regulation, the notion of regulatory science is also applied more broadly to refer to regulatory policies addressing methodological and ethical standards in science – think RECs and research misconduct regulations, among others. Meta science produces evidence of the quality of scientific practice and of the evidence base which has been produced. An example is the Cochrane systematic review. But Meta science may not address the normative judgment on evidentiary requirements necessary to protect human health and the environment.

Submission of articles (which must be focused on quality and accuracy of the underlying data) should cover topics such as (but not limited to):

- How quality of evidence affects risk assessments by regulators including RECs
- Contribution of meta-science to decrease lag time for safe/effective translation of regulated products/practices into patients
- Quality of real-world evidence necessary to support regulatory decisions
- Sufficient level of reproducibility of underlying science necessary to support regulatory decisions
- Quality of the meta science base to support regulation at various stages of the emergence of new technologies and old ones not under control
- Research security in the biomedical sciences
- Emerging methods for assuring high regulatory standards, i.e. natural language processing and other advanced analytics
- Analysis or regulatory successes and failures
- Experimental testing of regulations before full implementation
- Quality of shared data requirements for interoperable devices
- Democratization of goals to be achieved in regulatory science including in distribution of evidence and of errors
All should address how the merging of regulatory science and meta science approaches could significantly improve quality of regulated products/practices

Research Topic Research topic image

Article types and fees

This Research Topic accepts the following article types, unless otherwise specified in the Research Topic description:

  • Brief Research Report
  • Case Report
  • Clinical Trial
  • Editorial
  • General Commentary
  • Hypothesis and Theory
  • Methods
  • Mini Review
  • Opinion

Articles that are accepted for publication by our external editors following rigorous peer review incur a publishing fee charged to Authors, institutions, or funders.

Keywords: Translating research, Patient care practices, Research quality criteria, Research participant/patient, Regulatory science/affairs, Meta science, Scientific integrity

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Manuscripts can be submitted to this Research Topic via the main journal or any other participating journal.

Impact

  • 7,908Topic views
  • 5,481Article views
  • 1,421Article downloads
View impact