About this Research Topic
Potential topics for review articles may include, but are not limited to:
• Evidence based approaches to the development and adaptation of vaccination policies and strategies.
• Enablers, obstacles, and challenges in implementing vaccination programmes, including mass vaccination campaigns during disease outbreaks or pandemics.
• Monitoring of the impact of vaccination programmes in reducing vaccine-preventable disease burden across different populations and age groups.
• Vaccine safety monitoring systems and mechanisms for timely detection and response to adverse events.
• Role of the novel vaccine platforms and technologies in fostering vaccination programmes.
• Innovative approaches to ensure equitable vaccine distribution and accessibility.
• Management of vaccination hesitancy and uptake.
• Role of public-private partnerships in strengthening vaccination programmes and research collaborations.
This Research Topic aspires to become a comprehensive resource for researchers, policymakers, and healthcare practitioners, providing evidence-based insights to shape the future of vaccination programmes and bolster public health efforts worldwide. It also aims to highlight recent advances in the field, whilst emphasising important directions and new possibilities for future inquiries. We anticipate the research presented will promote discussion in the infectious diseases and public health community that will potentially translate to best practice applications.
The Reviews in Vaccination Programmes collection welcomes review-type articles on vaccination policies and strategies against a broad spectrum of infectious diseases.
Keywords: vaccination programmes, reviews in, infectious diseases, vaccine preventable diseases
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.