About this Research Topic
It is becoming clearer that a major strategy used by RSV to outsmart the host is to avoid the innate immune response. This feature may help the virus to repeatedly infect immune people throughout life. A better understanding of the mechanisms that RSV has evolved to circumvent the immune responses of its host is needed to develop better disease interventions.
In this Research Topic, we discuss important questions including:
• Why is immunological memory of RSV so poor?
• Why are anti-RSV antibody titers low?
• How does RSV infection in infancy contribute to childhood asthma-like syndrome?
• Is RSV (re)infection a driver of the dysfunctional airway inflammatory condition?
• How does long-term memory of RSV compare to other respiratory viruses?
• How do memory B cells become activated following RSV infection or vaccination?
• What are the mediators in respiratory epithelial cells produced in response to RSV?
• Is there a need for different vaccine strategies for different ages?
This Research Topic aims to address and highlight critical research needed to facilitate the discovery and development of disease intervention strategies for RSV. We welcome submissions of Original Research, Review/Mini-review, Methods, Opinion, and General Commentary articles.
Dr. Ralph A. Tripp is chief science officer at TrippBio, which is involved in the discovery, development, and commercialization of new antiviral treatments, but Dr. Tripp receives no financial remuneration. Dr. Lawrence Kauvar is founder, senior vice president, and chief scientific officer of Trellis Bioscience (employed full time, with a significant equity stake), which is involved in the development of drugs to treat infectious diseases, including RSV. Dr. Stephania A. Cormier declares no competing interests with regard to the topic theme.
Keywords: Respiratory syncytial virus, RSV, innate immune response, viral infectious diseases, respiratory viruses
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.