Gain of Function Research of Concern

  • 4,559

    Total Downloads

  • 38k

    Total Views and Downloads

Submit your idea

Select the journal/section where you want your idea to be submitted:

Submit your manuscript summarySubmit your manuscript

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Advances in molecular genetics have enabled the development and creation of genetically modified organisms. A consequence of work in this area has been controversy as to whether the products of genetic modification represent beneficial scientific advances, as their advocates argue, because they increase human knowledge or whether, as the opponents of such research argue, genetically modified organisms represent a serious potential threat to the environment. A particular facet of the controversy has developed because of studies with severe respiratory viral pathogens which have the potential to cause pandemics. The initial concern arose from work with the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1. The virus has a high mortality rate in chickens, is spread by wild fowl, and has an apparent mortality rate of about 50% in humans who are infected. The virus does not normally infect humans because human respiratory cells do not have the surface receptor required by H5N1; however, some people who came into close contact with infected fowl were infected with the mortality rate noted above. In 2011 two papers were submitted for publication which reported that modification of the viral hemagglutinin, the attachment protein, enabled H5N1 virus to be transmitted by respiratory droplets between ferrets, the best laboratory model for human influenza. The work was done to enhance surveillance of H5N1 which might present a serious threat to humans and to enhance the development of vaccines. Opponents raised concern that escape of such modified viruses from the laboratory could lead to a pandemic in which millions might die, because no vaccine existed, flu vaccines are of variable efficacy, and it was uncertain whether current antivirals would be effective and of sufficient availability. Papers were published, letters written, and symposia held to argue the issue. After lengthy consideration by the US National Scientific Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), it was recommended that the papers be allowed to be published. However, the controversy continued on an international level. Work with two additional respiratory viruses with high mortality, SARS and MERS, was also of concern. The controversy was exacerbated by the highly publicized mishandling of microbial pathogens by the CDC and the NIH/FDA. Consequently, the executive office of the US President enacted a moratorium on so-called gain of function research of concern. The NSABB was charged with developing a recommendation to the US government concerning the regulation of the research. A working group was constituted and external studies of risk assessment and bioethics were commissioned. Two symposia sponsored by the US National Academy of Sciences were also commissioned. The input from all of these and from the comments of numerous individuals were synthesized into a report by the NSABB working group which was accepted unanimously by the full NSABB May 24,2016 for transmission to the US government.

This proposal is for a Research Topic of Frontiers in Science in Biosafety and Biosecurity to solicit 5-10 articles from senior scientists, representing a diverse set of viewpoints, on the perceived risks, approach of regulation of the research, international synchrony in oversight and scientific cooperation, as well as the adequacy of current efforts to safeguard human health.

Keywords: Gain of Function Research of Concern, Pandemic Potential, Genetically Modified Organisms, Directed Evolution, Research Regulation

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Topic editors

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and they fall under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

      In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

     

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

     

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

     

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 38kTopic views
  • 32kArticle views
  • 4,559Article downloads
View impact