About this Research Topic
Through this Research Topic, we hope to shed light on multiple approaches that may improve the diagnosis and understanding of atypical AD phenotypes. New advances in biomarkers, specifically fluid biomarkers (CSF and plasma), brain functional, structural network connectivity (rsfMRI and DTI), hypometabolism profiles (18F FDG-PET), regional iron (QSM), amyloid- and tau-PET studies may help better understand atypical AD phenotypes. Among others, capturing and analyzing brain network connectivity patterns will be beneficial in identifying network abnormalities. Advances in characterizing clinical phenotype include quantification of movement, speech, eye tracking, and behavioral symptoms. A better understanding of symptomatology might inform management strategies and appropriate clinical outcomes in heterogeneous groups. New advances in genetic studies will also help unravel associations between candidate genes and the pathophysiology of atypical AD phenotypes. Moreover, studies investigating the detailed symptomatology and neuropsychological profiles, at the individual or group level, in these atypical AD phenotypes will provide new insights into brain-behavior associations. Lastly, a deeper understanding of individual-level molecular PET, MRI, and fluid findings will be crucial to aid diagnosis and help guide the inclusion of these patients in clinical treatment trials for AD.
The general aim of this Research Topic is to provide an update on atypical AD, using a broad range of fine-grained clinical, neuroimaging, and fluid markers, by focusing on new insights in diagnosis, clinical features, fluid, neuroimaging, and genetic markers. We also hope to inspire new collaborations and research ideas across the atypical AD research community.
We are accepting original research articles, case reports, and perspectives for publication within this Research Topic in Frontiers in Neuroscience.
Keywords: Alzhiemer's Disease, New Insights
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.