Knowledge, Attitudes and Perceptions of Healthcare Professionals and Health Professions Students Towards Vaccinations and Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions

  • 3,038

    Total downloads

  • 11k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

The importance of vaccines, as well as of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), for infectious risks’ prevention is well known, to protect patients and healthcare workers (HCW) at occupational risk. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted some issues related to the attitudes and perceptions towards these preventive measures, especially vaccinations: the infodemic spread several non-scientifically based information e.g. on vaccines' safety, undermining proper public health risk communication campaigns. Many persons, including HCW, showed some resistances to promptly accept these interventions. HCW are supposed to have acquired an appropriate scientific background, following specific trainings, being able to understand the indications of health policy when recommending a preventive measure. Nevertheless, unfortunately this was not always the case for HCWs' perceptions e.g. towards vaccines' safety and effectiveness, and the pandemic highlighted an issue that already emerged in previous years for other infectious risks (e.g. for anti-flu vaccines, for which the adherence rates among HCW are largely insufficient).

This Research Topic aims to provide new perspectives on the prevention of occupational infectious risk of HCW and health professions students (HPS), through implementation of specific vaccination campaigns and NPIs.

The first goal is to deepen and widen the knowledge on the current status of recommended vaccines and NPIs for HCW in different countries, highlighting possible issues e.g. on the expected vs. the actual adherence rates to vaccination campaigns.

Considering vaccines and infectious agents, novel studies on the acceptance of SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations among HCW and HPS will be particularly welcomed. Furthermore, other vaccines will be considered, including e.g. seasonal flu, MMR and MenACWY vaccines (NB: non-comprehensive list).

The final goal is to recognize and understand the main factors associated with possible issues in NPIs’ application as well as with poor vaccination habits among HCW and HPS. Studies investigating the effectiveness of vaccines, personal protective equipment and health polices for the prevention of the infectious risk, as well as the risk perception of HCW and HPS, will be particularly welcomed. These data will allow the identification of the most important points to be stressed within trainings, aimed at achieving adequate attitudes of HCW and HPS towards recommended vaccines and NPIs.

Considering these goals, the aims of this Research Topic are to collect original and review manuscripts providing:

1) Investigation of possible issues in the adherence to various vaccination campaigns and to NPIs of HCW and/or HPS, highlighting differences in adherence rates among various groups of HCW and/or medical departments, and possible socio-demographic correlates.

2) New epidemiological data on the associations between specific occupational infectious hazards and the attitudes of the health personnel and students towards the related recommended vaccines and NPIs.

3) Novel data on the effectiveness of vaccinations’ campaigns and NPIs for the prevention of the occupational infectious risk of health personnel.

4) Data investigating the risk perception of HCW and health professions students on recommended vaccinations and NPIs, highlighting critical issues to be addressed in future preventive interventions.

Research Topic Research topic image

Keywords: non-pharmaceutical interventions, vaccines, vaccinations, infectious, risk perception, SARS CoV 2, COVID 19, prevention, influenza, healthcare workers, students

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.