About this Research Topic
Executive functions (EF) are one such core dimension whose relevance reaches across current diagnostic boundaries. EF underpins our vital capacity to regulate our thoughts and actions to adapt to our constantly changing environments to reach our overall goal. EF encompasses a broad range of processes such as response inhibition, planning, multiprocessing, and attentional flexibility, and are closely related to working memory and have links with creativity and IQ. Recently, their mechanistic relation to emotional regulation has been recognized. EF are highly dependent on prefrontal and parietal brain regions that work in tandem with basal ganglia and specific neuro-modulatory systems including noradrenaline and dopamine.
On a practical level, EF tests, have already been used for decades to assess frontal lobe damage as well as neuropsychiatric disorders in patients. Their role in the assessment and treatment planning in psychiatry and beyond is less clear. There is a lively debate about what contribution EF tests can make to psychiatric assessment. While many are skeptical about the value they add within the current categorical diagnostic – from a dimensional perspective there is optimism that they could play a vital role in the personalization of therapy.
This Research Topic aims to broadly examine, the current status, and potential contribution of the EF construct in driving forward dimensional and personalized approaches to assessment, diagnosis, and intervention in psychiatry.
Topics of interest will be:
- The transdiagnostic significance and dimensional properties of EF.
- Clinical heterogeneity and EF.
- EF tests – their psychometric properties and clinical value.
- Advances in EF-based interventions and the relation to precision medicine.
- The relationship between EF and other core neuropsychological functions.
- EF used in non-patient populations
- Biological mechanisms of EF
Keywords: psychometrics, executive functions
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.