About this Research Topic
Establishing and validating prognosis prediction models in neurocritical ill patients is imperative, as many diseases are fatal or cause severe disability. Patients, families, and healthcare professionals want to know what to expect, and these expectations often influence both short-term and long-term healthcare decisions. Therefore, collecting reliable prognostic models to quantify individual patient risk is necessary and desirable to guide better treatment of individuals affected by nerve damage. Prognostic models can provide a reference and basis for early identification, prevention, and control of poor prognosis in clinical practice. To promote the early screening and monitoring of neurocritical patients in clinical practice, prevent the occurrence and development of adverse prognoses, improve the quality of life of patients, reduce the medical burden of patients, and improve the clinical work efficiency of medical staff.
This Research Topic aims to construct a prognosis model to provide reference and evidence for the early identification, prevention, and control of poor prognosis in clinical treatment and care. We hope to foster best practices in caring for patients hospitalized because of neurological illnesses. We welcome submissions of Original Research articles, Reviews, Mini-reviews, Commentaries, etc.
Potential topics include but are not limited to the following:
- Construction of prognostic models by machine learning techniques in patients with neurocritical and neurohospitalist care
- Validating and improving the established prognosis prediction models in neurocritical ill patients
- Narrowing down the implementation gap by studying the application of the prognosis prediction models in neurocritical ill patients
- Review the research progress of prognostic models in neurocritical and neurohospitalist care
Keywords: Neurocritical Critical Care, Prognosis, Prediction Model, Health Care, Personalized Medicine
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.