About this Research Topic
This Research Topic aims to collect articles that diachronically investigate human bipedalism focusing on:
1) Selective pressures (e.g., changing of landscapes, climate, ecology) and theories on the initial evolution of bipedalism (e.g., arboreal or terrestrial origin?).
2) Kinematic variability among hominins (e.g., australopiths, H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis), with an emphasis on the consequences of variation in foot musculoskeletal morphology.
3) Obligate bipedalism in Homo and biomechanical challenges: from mobile foragers to sedentary groups traversing mountainous terrain to coastal plains.
4) Biomechanics of modern human walking gaits and the influence of abnormalities or pathologies (e.g., flatfoot, valgus knee, etc.) on musculoskeletal anatomy.
The themes of this Research Topic include open access papers on the evolution of human bipedalism and walking or anatomical variation among modern humans. We seek to blend morphological, biomechanical, and clinical points of view. Studies on bipedalism in non-humans for comparison with human bipedal kinematics/kinetics are also of interest. We welcome authors to submit from across relevant disciplines and contributions that cross-link different disciplines are especially targeted. We prioritize interdisciplinary and thematically focused work in Paleoanthropology, Biological Anthropology, Human Health, Comparative Anatomy, Biomechanics, Functional Morphology, Skeletal Plasticity, and Human Movement. Article types including method-driven research on modern humans, hominins, or comparative extant taxa, experiments/data collection and overviews of different time frames in human evolutionary history will be prioritized. Specific clinical case studies in modern contexts, but with evolutionary implications, also will be sought.
Keywords: Bipedalism, Biomechanics, Functional Morphology, Human Evolution, Skeletal Plasticity, Biological Anthropology, Human Movement, Human Health
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.