Quantification of pathogens by molecular methods

  • 71k

    Total downloads

  • 611k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

The advent of molecular biology tools had a tremendous impact on the quantification of the real number of microorganisms present in different matrices including food and environmental samples.
Traditional methods for quantification of microorganisms rely on counting serially diluted plates assays (bacteria), direct counting by optical microscopy chambers (bacteria and protozoa), transmission electron microscopy (viruses), plaque assays (viruses and bacteria), endpoint dilution and hemagglutination assays (viruses). More recently, flow cytometric assays and particularly quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) have been extensively used in this context, providing more robust, faster and many times more sensitive quantifications than conventional methodologies.
The qPCR (synonymous designation real time PCR could be also used) is currently the preferred tool of choice to quantify the number of different microorganisms (including not only bacteria, but mainly viruses as well as fungi). However, qPCR in basic setup cannot distinguish between viable and dead cells, which represents the issue in diagnostics of bacteria and partially in fungi. Therefore, the quantity of cells must be confirmed by culture in these cases. But, assuming that not all bacteria on the Earth can be cultured and with regard to the non-cultivable bacteria, qPCR-based methods represent the only tool to detect and quantify such bacteria.
There are no general rules for determination of microbial quantity by qPCR. The most common approach uses quantification standard derived from plasmid harbouring DNA target insert, pure DNA extracted from the microorganism of interest or PCR products. Subsequently, quantity of DNA in such standards is frequently determined by spectrophotometric or fluorometric approaches. However, if the DNA is not purified properly, it often leads to overestimation of DNA quantity. Confirmation of standard DNA quantity by the correlation with culture is not universally usable because each method determines the quantity in different way.
Recent developments in PCR technologies provided large scale of new techniques exploitable in quantification of microorganisms. Digital PCR (dPCR) currently attracts the interest of scientific community as it enables determination of DNA quantity in the sample by qPCR without necessity of using any kind of quantification standard. The method is based on limiting dilution and Poisson statistical analysis.
Vibrational spectroscopic based techniques, namely infrared and Raman spectroscopies, are also valuable techniques for an accurate microbial quantification, enabling the discrimination of bacteria in different physiological states. Their use in Microbiology has been widely expanded in the last 15 years as they are able to provide information in a non-destructive and reliable way and at a single-cell level with minimal preparation of samples. These methods are particularly useful because their coupling with multivariate analysis enables the monitoring biological processes in real time and without the necessity of exogenous chemical reagents, which saves costs, efforts and time in an environmentally friendly way.
The aim of this work is to provide a platform, in which researchers can discuss about the limits of the qPCR and dPCR in the field of microorganisms quantification taking into account the MIQE guidelines (Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments) available for both qPCR and dPCR. The potentiality of infrared and Raman spectroscopies in bacterial quantification will be also addressed.

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 611kTopic views
  • 529kArticle views
  • 71kArticle downloads
View impact