About this Research Topic
In certain neurodegenerative disorders e.g. Parkinson’s disease (PD) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) the lack of sensitive early biomarker of the disease leads to failure of most neuroprotective agents as they are usually tried very late to pose a difference in disease progress. The issue of biomarkers development, however, is not restricted to being capable of early diagnosis of the disease. Indeed, the challenge of sensitivity and specificity is a major one. The ability to differentiate between various neurological disorders seems mandatory, moreover, the usefulness in identifying every case is another need. Another challenge is the applicability of a biomarker. For example, brain biopsy can evidently diagnose most of neurodegenerative diseases. But, by any way, this cannot be a routine diagnostic tool. One extra point that must be taken in consideration when developing a biomarker is the economic feasibility of it. A super expensive test, that can be obtained only in certain areas of the world will not help a lot. Instead, a low price, accessible biomarker is the ideal choice for all clinicians.
The aim of this Research Topic is to begin a dialogue regarding methods of developing, validation and accreditation of biomarkers for brain damage. As can be seen from the diversity of biomarkers nature, this proposal is open to different scientists who could be interested. The final aim of our project is to reach an easy, accessible and cost-effective yet sensitive, and specific biomarker for brain disease. We would like also to raise the attention of validation methods of a biomarker before adoption for clinical practice. Simply, developing a realistic biomarker for brain disease could form a paradigm shift in the management of this disorder.
Keywords: Biomarkers, Validation, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Microbiomarkers, Genomics, Neuro-Proteins, Autoantibodies
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.