Getting Diagnosis Right in Child Psychiatry: Lessons From the Pediatric Bipolar Disorder Era

  • 1,539

    Total downloads

  • 8,309

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Disturbances of mood and behavior in pre-adolescent children are both ubiquitous and varied. They can defy simple diagnostic categorization and warrant a thorough individualized diagnostic assessment. The biopsychosocial model still offers the best guide to considering all the relevant factors that contribute to mood lability and behavior dysregulation in children. Further, a developmental psychological perspective adds another layer to more accurately guide elucidating the contributory etiological factors to a child’s presenting symptom complex.

Despite more classical psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, severe major depression generally not presenting prior to adolescence, childhood mood lability and behavioral dysregulation can be severe. In the 1990s some researchers, primarily in the USA, hypothesized that mania, and thus bipolar disorder, was presenting very early in young children, with irritable, mixed and ultra-rapid cycling of manic and depressive episodes to cause extreme mood lability and oppositional behavior. The ‘new’ disorder was described as “juvenile bipolar disorder” or “pediatric bipolar disorder” (PBD).

The PBD hypothesis had heuristic value in that the developmental precursors to bipolar disorder were at the time neglected. Diagnosis of mania in adolescence and young adulthood was often late. Today, earlier recognition of first episodes of mania remains an important task for mental health services. Also, since the 1990s, longitudinal high-risk offspring studies have been providing insights into the developmental precursors to bipolar disorder.

Unfortunately, the PBD hypothesis prematurely translated into widespread clinical practice and many children were misdiagnosed with bipolar disorder when other diagnostic formulations such as
responses to maltreatment and trauma, ADHD, autism spectrum and learning disorders, oppositional defiant and conduct disorders, family relationship and parenting issues, anxiety, and depressive syndromes were the likely etiological factors contributing to the mood lability and behavior dysregulation.

Given that the severity was felt to not always be well described by those diagnostic categories, a new diagnosis was coined for DSM-5: Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder (DMDD). As stated, by the DSM-5 committee, the intention of DMDD was to reduce overdiagnosis of PBD as well as draw attention to a cluster of children with severe mood lability and disruptive behavior.

Yet DMDD is simply a descriptive label that restates the phenomenology. Research as to what it means has generally not yet fully explored the myriad of potential biopsychosocial predisposing, precipitating, perpetuating, or protective factors. The need to apply the classical biopsychosocial case formulation diagnostic approach is one lesson from the PBD era.

There have been iatrogenic consequences of the PBD era: missed alternative more accurate diagnoses; adverse effects of heavy psychotropic medication regimes; and warping of children’s self-identity through the medicalization of normal, albeit perhaps extreme, emotional states. The pharmaceutical industry encouraged a wide adoption of the PBD label by sponsoring research, continuing medical education, and consumer advocacy groups.

The lessons to draw from the PBD era are several and this Frontiers Research Topic is open to submissions on the following:

• Applying a biopsychosocial diagnostic formulation in a developmental context to children with internalizing and externalizing disorders, particularly severe mood lability and disruptive behavior

• Reviews of the PBD era and lessons to be learned from an overdiagnosis epidemic, including factors such as insurance-driven ‘diagnostic inflation’ and over-medicalization of emotional distress and context driven behavior

• Studies, reviews and debates on the prevalence and age of onset of bipolar disorder

• Studies, reviews and debates on the merits or otherwise of the DMDD diagnostic category

• Studies, reviews and debates on the developmental precursors of bipolar disorder as determined thus far in high-risk offspring studies

• Reviews and critiques of the role of the pharmaceutical industry in influencing psychiatric nosology

• Issues of iatrogenesis: from inappropriate psychotropic medication; diagnostic labelling; and missed alternative diagnostic formulations

• Biopsychosocial assessment and management strategies for childhood DMDD-like syndromes, with a focus on parent training programs, parent-child dyadic narrative therapies, and family therapy.

Research Topic Research topic image

Keywords: bipolar disorder, diagnosis, assessment, mood, etiopathology, early intervention, disruptive behavior, offspring studies, parent training, iatrogenic, bioethics.

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.