About this Research Topic
- First of all, there is a large debate on the appropriate and optimal use of the current CSF biomarkers that now face clinical implementation; when and how (alone, in combination..) to use them: for AD screening, in routine, for early or atypical AD cases etc..
- How to measure them in the most reliable way, a question which necessitates discussion on standard operating procedures, harmonization, quality control, establishment of reference material and methods, comparison of analytical platforms (immuno-detection, single and multiplex assays, mass spectrometry).
- How to improve the biological diagnosis of AD (in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and differentiation with other neurodegenerative disorders) with the help of new biomarkers. This major topic has two complementary aspects: the detection of additional Aβ and tau isoforms, and the detection of completely new biomarkers (in particular from “omics” studies). Of note, there is not a week without the suggestion in the literature of a new putative biomarkers for AD.
- Related to the above item is the issue of a blood diagnosis of AD as most of the “interesting” biomarkers are being detected in the CSF which limits their usage.
- The use of biomarkers for the stratification, the follow-up and to predict therapeutic response of patients involved in therapeutic trails of AD.
- The last but not the least important issue of AD biomarkers is how they relate to the understanding of the pathophysiology of AD, and to new therapeutic leads.
In conclusion, the topic “Biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease” is a very active topic that has a major importance for medical diagnosis, basic research and therapeutics in the neurology and neuroscience field.
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.