Acute Symptomatic Seizures and Epileptiform Abnormalities: Management and Outcomes

  • 7,664

    Total Downloads

  • 38k

    Total Views and Downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Clinical acute symptomatic seizures (ASyS) account for 40% of all afebrile seizures. With an exponential increase in the use of EEG monitoring at the time of acute brain injuries (ABIs) worldwide, there has been a significant increase in the detection of ASyS, the majority of which are non-convulsive. In addition to electrographic seizures (Sz), cEEG identifies other epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) such as lateralized periodic discharges (LPDs, formerly PLEDs), lateralized rhythmic delta activity (LRDA), sporadic epileptiform discharges, etc. in approximately 30% of the recordings. The EAs are conclusively associated with an increased risk of ASyS, but their long-term significance is not well understood. Around 20% of AsyS patients suffer 30-days mortality. Additionally, 20 - 30% of ASyS patients go on to develop epilepsy. Therefore, patients with ASyS and EAs are invariably treated with ASMs to prevent recurrent ASyS. However, it is unclear how long after ASyS and EAs do the risk of Sz remains high enough to warrant ASM use. Currently, prolonged ASM treatment does not reduce the long-term risk of epilepsy development. Nonetheless, almost all patients with ASyS are discharged on ASMs, and 50-90% of them continue ASMs for 12 months or longer. In addition, the impact of ASMs on neurocognitive outcomes in this population remains unexplored.

There is a vast knowledge gap about the immediate and long-term implications of ASyS and EAs on patient outcomes, including morbidity, epilepsy development (epileptogenesis), cognition, and psychosocial metrics. ASyS are associated with increased mortality. However, almost no data and research guide the in-hospital and post-discharge ASM management after ASyS. The common practice of using ASMs in patients with acute EAs to prevent ASyS goes scientifically unchallenged. The evidence-free use of ASMs is a major concern as their impact on functional outcomes is poorly understood. Additionally, it remains unclear if clinical and electrographic ASyS exert comparable impact on patient outcomes and deserve equally aggressive management. The duration of ASMs use for secondary prophylaxis of early and late seizures needs to be balanced against their potential adverse effects and lack of anti-epileptogenesis properties.

Research in the last couple of years illustrates that acute EAs and electrographic ASyS may serve as biomarkers of epileptogenesis, and their high burden could be associated with poor functional outcomes at hospital discharge. However, this is only akin to the proverbial “scratching the surface”, and there is a dire need to “dig deeper”, because ASyS and EAs are ubiquitous in clinical practice of epilepsy, especially given the high prevalence of ABIs like traumatic brain injury, strokes, hemorrhage, etc. The last two decades have seen rapid and parallel advancements in neurocritical care and critical care epilepsy through the use of acute EEG monitoring, which has brought us to the threshold of major breakthroughs in addressing the above questions.

The goal of this Research Topic is to become the landmark step that heralds our collective understanding of management and outcomes after ASyS and EAs.

We are interested in original research articles, brief research, case reports, mini-reviews, full-length reviews, systematic reviews, perspective, opinions, hypothesis and theory generation that address following themes:

• Epidemiology of ASyS and acute EAs in various ABI and systemic insults/encephalopathy

• Impact of ASyS and EAs on disability and functional outcomes

• Immediate and late neuroimaging features of ASyS and/or acute EAs

• Late electrophysiological markers and remnants of ASyS and/or acute EAs

• ASM use after ASyS for preventing ASyS recurrence (secondary prophylaxis)

• Multi-modal predictors of successful ASyS control using ASMs

• ASM use after detection of acute EAs: pros and cons

• Local, national, or international practices of ASM use after ASyS and/or acute EAs

• Epilepsy development after ASyS and/or acute EAs

• Multi-modal predictors of epilepsy development in patients with ASyS and/or acute EAs

• Etiology specific ASyS risk and features

• Clinical vs. electrographic ASyS: Differences and similarities

• Translational studies on animal models of ASyS and implications in humans

Research Topic Research topic image

Keywords: symptomatic seizures, provoked seizures, continuous EEG, cEEG, Lateralized periodic discharges, LPDs, periodic patterns, GPDs, anti-seizure medications, epileptogenesis

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Impact

  • 38kTopic views
  • 30kArticle views
  • 7,664Article downloads
View impact