About this Research Topic
The goal of this Research Topic is to provide a platform for any studies that apply social norms to the field of managerial decision-making and related areas. The Research Topic will be specifically looking for both experimental (lab and field) and empirical (survey, secondary data) studies that are designed to examine the effects of social norms on pro-social and pro-environmental decision-makings of corporate executives, employees, consumers and policy makers. Studies that describe cognitive and emotional mechanisms of above social norm effects using behavioral and/or neuroscience technologies and methods (e.g., EEG, tDCS, fNIRS, facial coding, and eye-tracking) are also welcome to submit.
Authors are encouraged to submit manuscripts that investigate the roles of social norms (e.g., norms for fairness, reciprocity, altruism, honesty, responsibility, cooperation, green consumption and food sharing) in the areas but not limited to:
-Corporate governance and strategic management (e.g., corporate social responsibility; board dissent).
-Accounting and finance (e.g., financial fraud).
-Operations management (e.g., product quality).
-Information and technology management (e.g., information security).
-Organizational behavior (e.g., unethical behavior).
-Consumer behavior (e.g., green consumption).
-Environmental management and public administration (e.g., food waste; recovery and recycling; charitable donation; vaccination).
Article Types Accepted include: Original Research; Review; Brief Research Report; Case Study; Hypothesis and Theory; Methods; Perspective; Conceptual Analysis.
Keywords: Social norms, Managerial decision-making, Decision neuroscience, Emotion, Social preference, Altruistic punishment, Fairness, Cooperation, Environmental management
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.