About this Research Topic
Advances in diagnosis and treatment have allowed children with CHDs to survive well into adulthood. Besides genetic, epigenetic or environmental basis, the improvement of post-surgery outcomes, new treatments, and life quality of CHDs patients have become another research direction for CHD specialists. They are stepping into a new field to determine whether specific genotypes or alleles are associated with long-term outcomes of different surgical treatment.
This Research Topic will focus on the genetic, epigenetic and environmental contributors and their interactions in human, the associations between long-term outcomes and genotype, new clinical treatments, and the quality of life of CHDs patients.
On the basis of precursory works and information, we aim to elaborate how genetics and genomic result in or predispose an individual to CHD, to provide more evidence for the establishment of molecular diagnosis of CHDs to guide the family planning, and most importantly, to combine the scientific work of genetics and genomic in CHDs with clinical diagnosis and treatment.
We hope that the contributions to this Research Topic will aid in molecular diagnosis and treatment of CHDs. We welcome Original Research articles as well as Reviews on subtopics including, but not limited to:
• Next generation sequencing, linkage analysis and GWAS for sporadic, familial CHDs with/without extracardiac congenital anomalies.
• The mechanism of newly reported aberrations of genetics and genomic in CHDs.
• The interactions between genetics and genomic and environmental factors in CHDs.
• New insights of physiology and pathology of CHDs.
• Molecular diagnosis of CHDs.
• The associations between genotype and phenotype (clinical manifestation, molecular imaging, electrophysiology and echocardiography) in CHDs.
• The associations between long-term outcomes and genotype in CHDs.
Keywords: Congenital heart disease, Genetics, Genome, diagnostics, treatments
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.