About this Research Topic
There is an assumption that well-organized crisis management and communication processes reduce vulnerability and help communities cope with hazard-related situations. The problem is that when a crisis occurs, individuals as well as public and non-governmental organizations tend to end up overwhelmed and paralyzed, as they experience difficulties adjusting rapidly enough to new situations. Sources to date conflict on exactly why this is, but possible reasons include problems related to vast bureaucracies and decision hierarchies, insufficient knowledge, and failure to prioritize and develop strategic learning aspects of exercises. As a result, many stakeholders continually struggle to meet societal expectations, develop resilient frameworks, and find more effective, joint solutions to enhance collaborative crisis mitigation, preparedness, and response efforts. Further research is therefore needed to introduce new ideas and approaches that may contribute to the development of crisis management.
This Research Topic aims to address the particular need for research that contributes to developing joint risk mitigation, preparedness and response efforts. Especially welcome are manuscripts that provide critical perspectives on interpersonal and organizational dilemmas, governance, risk identification, communication, media coverage, collaboration, and transfer of knowledge.
Contributors are encouraged to consult the article types accepted into the journal section through which they submit to this Research Topic: Disaster Communications, Organizational Psychology, and Disaster and Emergency Medicine. All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer review process.
Keywords: Crisis management, collaboration, exercises, crisis communication, risk, governance, public health and medicine management
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.