About this Research Topic
Growing evidence supports umbilical cord management at birth as a potential influence on survival and major neonatal morbidities. However, enthusiasm for adopting UCM is tempered by a lack of strong evidence from large clinical trials and hemodynamic concerns related to rapid cord blood transfusion. Among newborns at 23 to 27 weeks’ gestation, the rate of severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) is statistically significantly higher with UCM than with delayed umbilical cord clamping, but further study is required in such high-risk patients. The current recommendation for umbilical cord management in newborns who exhibit signs of depression at birth and require resuscitation is to immediately clamp the umbilical cord. This recommendation is due in part to insufficient evidence to support UCM in the presence of perinatal distress.
This Research Topic will provide a focus for further evidence to determine the benefits or potential harms of UCM. To compare placental transfusion techniques, well-designed trials are needed, including large-scale randomized controlled studies, prospective trials, original research, molecular studies, and reviews.
This article collection is envisaged to address, but not be limited to, the following themes:
- Process and technique of UCM
- Role of mode of delivery in UCM
- Neonatal outcomes
- Maternal outcomes
- Outcomes among pre-term infants
- Use and outcomes of UCM in multiple gestations
- Concerns related to UCM
- Long term outcomes and follow-up
Keywords: umbilical cord milking, umbilical cord management, intact-umbilical cord milking, cut-umbilical cord milking, delayed cord clamping, immediate cord clamping, placental transfusion, neonates
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.