About this Research Topic
Until recently, scholarly consensus across the social sciences and history adhered to the view that the incorporation of citizen voice in governance (e.g., democracy) was an entirely Western phenomenon that mostly is a product of the emergence of rational thought and the modern world. These views are now empirically questioned and subject to serious reconsideration. Yet, even researchers who recognize a broader temporal span for democratic or “good” governance draw fundamental distinctions between these political forms in the past and present.
Building on the collective action theories, in particular those focused on fiscal financing, the editors of this Research Topic outline fundamental characteristics (internal financing, equitable taxation, checks on power, and a functioning bureaucracy) at the core of good governance, which are neither the sole project of the contemporary West, nor tied to any specific ideological construct or form of leadership. Even elections can no longer be conceived as assurance of good governance. At this time of global challenges to democracy, understanding the comparative history of good governments, their core institutions, how they worked, their foundations, what led to their downfalls, and the factors that prompted their sustenance or their collapses are extremely important to document. The historical trends and coactive processes that underpinned those human cooperative arrangements, which fostered growth and general well-being, require comparative focus if we are to draw on the wealth of human history to help craft better governance in the future and forestall the tripwires that lead to its failures.
We welcome contributions which focus on;
• Diachronic examinations of changes in the fiscal foundations of governance and their impacts on governance.
• Comparative analysis of governmental variability and its relationship to collective action and its fiscal financing.
• Cross-temporal studies of shifts in the degree of good governance and relations to inequality, sustainability, bureaucracy, public goods and services, and fiscal financing.
• The importance of social compacts and contracts in representative government and how these are sustained and break down.
• Alternatives and supplements to elections as means of assessing subaltern voices.
• The relationship between governance and inequality over time and across space.
• Differences in modes of political collapse and their relationship to governance, fiscal financing, and responses of principals.
• The role of public ritual in good versus autocratic governments.
• Variance in communication and computation in good versus autocratic governments.
• The relationship between comparative governance and the uses and spatial distributions of community/urban space, residential and non-residential architecture, sprawl versus compact settlement.
• The relationship between comparative governance and neighborhood organization.
• Was there one or many episodes of enlightenment?
• The relationship between governance and coactive processes including considerations of demographic growth, patterns of migration, well-being, economic growth.
• The relationship between slave labor and governance, spot resources and governance.
• Non-hierarchical and egalitarian forms of governance in non-state societies.
• Indigenous inspirations and influences on the Constitution of the United States.
• Collective action and establishment of early cities.
Our aim for this Research Topic is to compile a series of research essays drawn from a broad cross-regional and cross-temporal sample of historical settings to explore issues and themes relevant to the history and processes that have been at the heart of good governance.
Building on the collective action theories, in particular those focused on fiscal financing, the editors of this Research Topic outline fundamental characteristics (internal financing, equitable taxation, checks on power, and a functioning bureaucracy) at the core of good governance, which are neither the sole project of the contemporary West, nor tied to any specific ideological construct or form of leadership. Even elections can no longer be conceived as assurance of good governance. At this time of global challenges to democracy, understanding the comparative history of good governments, their core institutions, how they worked, their foundations, what led to their downfalls, and the factors that prompted their sustenance or their collapses are extremely important to document. The historical trends and coactive processes that underpinned those human cooperative arrangements, which fostered growth and general well-being, require comparative focus if we are to draw on the wealth of human history to help craft better governance in the future and forestall the tripwires that lead to its failures.
We welcome contributions which focus on;
• Diachronic examinations of changes in the fiscal foundations of governance and their impacts on governance.
• Comparative analysis of governmental variability and its relationship to collective action and its fiscal financing.
• Cross-temporal studies of shifts in the degree of good governance and relations to inequality, sustainability, bureaucracy, public goods and services, and fiscal financing.
• The importance of social compacts and contracts in representative government and how these are sustained and break down.
• Alternatives and supplements to elections as means of assessing subaltern voices.
• The relationship between governance and inequality over time and across space.
• Differences in modes of political collapse and their relationship to governance, fiscal financing, and responses of principals.
• The role of public ritual in good versus autocratic governments.
• Variance in communication and computation in good versus autocratic governments.
• The relationship between comparative governance and the uses and spatial distributions of community/urban space, residential and non-residential architecture, sprawl versus compact settlement.
• The relationship between comparative governance and neighborhood organization.
• Was there one or many episodes of enlightenment?
• The relationship between governance and coactive processes including considerations of demographic growth, patterns of migration, well-being, economic growth.
• The relationship between slave labor and governance, spot resources and governance.
• Non-hierarchical and egalitarian forms of governance in non-state societies.
• Indigenous inspirations and influences on the Constitution of the United States.
• Collective action and establishment of early cities.
Our aim for this Research Topic is to compile a series of research essays drawn from a broad cross-regional and cross-temporal sample of historical settings to explore issues and themes relevant to the history and processes that have been at the heart of good governance.
Keywords: autocracy, bureaucracy, coactive processes, collection action, comparative history, constitutions, democracy, elections, external resources, fiscal financing, good governance, inequality, internal resources, leadership, political communication, political power, political collapse, public goods and services, social compacts and contracts, subalterns, sustainability, taxation, transactional networks
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.
