About this Research Topic
In the absence of head-to-head comparative trials with VNS, DBS and RNS, the results of the randomized controlled trials suggest that in choosing a therapy for unsuitable surgery candidates none of the neurostimulation options is superior with regards to efficacy. Differences in invasiveness and adverse events may therefore direct the choice between these options. Indeed, the choice of a specific type of neurostimulation results frequently from the personal experience of the clinician and practice at a specific epilepsy center.
The aim of this research topic is to describe how different stimulation modalities are used in specific epilepsy patients, highlight pitfalls in patient selection, explain the use of specific stimulation paradigms and contribute to the general understanding of mechanisms of action.
- Clinical research covering biomarkers of response to specific neurostimulation therapies
- Fundamental research covering mechanisms of action of VNS and DBS in animal models
- Case studies explaining specific stimulation protocols with RNS/DBS/TMS/TDCS
- Reviews covering clinical and fundamental aspects of neurostimulation for refractory epilepsy
- Novel methodological advancements with respect to neurostimulation devices, for example: incorporating new seizure detection and reporting techniques, new methodologies to target better intracerebral structures, MRI compatibility
- Responsive VNS
This research topic is open for different types of manuscripts: reviews, original research articles, case studies.
Keywords: Reafractory epilepsy, VNS, DBS, RNS, TMS
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.