About this Research Topic
The COVID-19 pandemic, outspread at the beginning of 2020, had a massive impact on health-services all over the world. Concerning surgical departments, the influence of COVID-19 on daily practice has been widespread, ranging from workforce and staffing issues, procedural triaging, peri- and intra-operative infection risk, unification of different wards, changes to peri-operative practice and ways of working alongside the consequences on surgical education and training. To face the effects of the pandemic, many measures have been adopted, consisting of reorganization of facilities, redeploying staff, prioritizing oncological cases and telemedicine introduction or improvement. If on the one hand many aspects of the emergency have worsened work activity, on the other it gave us the opportunity to develop changes that were previously unthinkable and to rethink our departments on the basis of the experience gained. Based on these considerations, our aim is to take this opportunity for change and propose a Research Topic on how to best optimize resources in thoracic surgery to further improve patient care in the near future.
Therefore, we propose the following list of topics that will be addressed by worldwide famous experts according to the experience in their departments. Review articles and original research are both accepted.
• How to increase OR efficiency
• How to increase ward/clinics efficiency
• How to reduce mistakes in surgery
• How to reduce variability of care
• How to motivate and retain staff
• Non surgical skills for surgeons (lateral thinking, understanding and communicating with different personalities, teaching)
• How to create an academic department
• How to set up an institutional database
• Standardization of procedures to contain cost and reduce variability of care
Keywords: pandemic, thoracic surgery, resources, technological innovation, revolution
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.