Update on the Diagnosis and Management of CIDP Variants

  • 13k

    Total downloads

  • 78k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) is a well-described, acquired, immune-mediated polyneuropathy. It is characterized by motor and sensory deficits in various combinations, presenting with a relapsing-remitting or progressive course. The spectrum of CIDP includes typical CIDP and atypical CIDP variants, such as distal acquired symmetric neuropathy (DADS), multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), focal CIDP forms, pure sensory and pure motor CIDP and chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy (CISP). In addition, CIDP can occur in association with other auto-immune diseases, together with central nervous system demyelination, or it may overlap with hereditary or diabetic neuropathy. Standard clinical and neurophysiological criteria establish the diagnosis in the typical idiopathic CIDP. However, although a general consensus is currently formed for the different CIDP subtypes, diagnostic criteria are not well defined. The correct diagnosis in such cases may therefore be delayed, and patients with atypical CIDP are often excluded from clinical trials and deprived of potentially successful treatments. On the other hand, patients with a neuropathy not clearly classified could be at risk for potential side-effects of an undue medication. Moreover, the evolution of the disease is indeterminate, and these patients often meet the criteria for typical CIDP at a later stage.

The two main reasons for the uncertainty in atypical CIDP are the rarity of this neuropathy and the wide variety of clinical phenotypes, neurophysiological and immunological profiles. As a result, a change of an initial diagnosis along the course of the disease can be expected, when new manifestations, electrophysiological findings or immunological data become apparent. Over the last decade, the presence of several auto-antibodies against peripheral nerve targets has been reported in a minority of patients with CIDP. Some of them, such as Neurofascin 155 /186, or Contactin 1 antibodies have been associated with distinct clinical presentations and response to treatment. In cohorts of CIDP patients, the detection of different anti-nerve antibodies, and their clinical syndromes, are currently under study. Neurophysiology plays a pivotal role in the diagnostic process of CIDP and variants, since it provides evidence of specific conduction abnormalities i.e. diffuse versus focal slowing and block, it assesses the severity and the distribution of lesions and unravels subclinical nerve dysfunction. Atypical CIDP cases demonstrate certain electrophysiological findings but no structural criteria for these conditions have been established. Not uncommonly, electrophysiological abnormalities are minimal or equivocal, requiring supplementation with more specialized techniques. Neuro-imaging, including ultrasound and MRI techniques, is a relatively novel diagnostic tool for CIDP and variants, being particularly useful to study proximal neural parts i.e. plexus or roots and individual nerves. However, the distinction by imaging between hereditary and acquired demyelinating neuropathies is difficult. Moreover, specific neuro-imaging signs suitable for the identification and follow-up of different sub-types of CIDP have not yet been suggested. Limited information is available in regards to management, clinical course and outcome of atypical CIDP. There are reports suggesting that not all CIDP sub-types responded equally well to first-line treatment. Novel immunomodulatory strategies have not been designed for CIDP variants. The same applies for CIDP patients with additional medical conditions such as malignancy, other autoimmune diseases, or diabetes mellitus.

The aim of this Research Topic is to provide an outline of the current knowledge on all different aspects of atypical CIDP. We expect that the Reader could benefit from gaining access to comprehensive data on pathophysiology, neurophysiology, and neuroimaging of these conditions, which may have a positive impact on the clinical decision process and optimal management of patients. Submission of Reviews and Original Research focusing on, but not limited to, the following themes are welcome:

1. Appropriate neurophysiological techniques to enhance the sensitivity of diagnosis in atypical CIDP cases;
2. The role of neuroimaging in distinguishing and monitoring atypical CIDP cases;
3. Association between immunological profile and clinical phenotype;
4. Treatment approaches matching the clinical CIDP variant;
5. The significance of combined peripheral and central nervous system demyelination;
6. Differences/similarities between idiopathic CIDP and CIDP as part of a systemic disease, complicating malignancy, or in conjunction with hereditary neuropathy;
7. Promising novel diagnostic and therapeutic markers for disease progress and outcome.

Keywords: demyelinating neuropathy, radiculopathy, autoimmune, atypical CIDP, anti-neuronal antibodies, neuroimaging, Sensory CIDP, polyradiculopathy, DADS, MADSAM, neurophysiology, nodo-paranodopathies

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.