About this Research Topic
The goal of this Research Topic is to review assessment research of depressive disorder in children and adolescents with a focus on the diagnostic issue more specifically using the recent advances in neuroimaging (for example machine learning methodologies). There are changing trends in neuroimaging studies but despite the growing number of MRI studies on MDD, reverse inference is not possible as MRI scans cannot be used to aid in the diagnosis or treatment planning of patients with MDD. Hence, researchers must develop “bridges” to overcome the reverse inference fallacy in order to build effective tools for MDD diagnostics. We may integrate more recent advances (for example, multimodal imaging, AI, and genetics) for the diagnosis in pediatric mood disorders.
• The benefits and costs of involving clinical judgment in the diagnostic process;
• The validity of parent, teacher, and youth self-report of mood symptoms;
• How much cross-situational consistency is typically shown in mood and behaviour in different cultural spectrum;
• How different measures compare in terms of detecting mood disorder;
• The challenges in comparing the performance of measures across research groups;
• The understanding of the neural underpinnings and neuro-functional deficits involved in depression in developmental population
• The implications of newer biological and technological advances in the assessment of pediatric mood disorders (for example, machine learning etc.);
• Research to increase the understanding of phenomenology of mood disorder from a developmental framework;
• Neuroimaging methodology and its use for diagnosis including functional MRI and connectivity studies and machine learning;
• Cytokines and other neuroinflammatory biomarkers of depressive disorders;
• Comorbidity and differential diagnosis (from bipolar disorder etc.).
Keywords: Depression, Depressive Disorder, Diagnosis, Biomarkers, Neuroimaging
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.