About this Research Topic
Mild, unlike more severe brain injury, is typically lacking objective findings to confirm diagnosis. While symptoms may abound across cognitive, affective and physical domains, particularly early following trauma, controversy exists regarding the natural history of mTBI, with some patients recovering well and others doing poorly.
This Research topic will present some of the advances in brain injury medicine that have informed our understanding of the variability in symptomatology and clinical outcomes between patients. More specifically, we will describe the advances in brain injury biomechanics, neuroimaging, traumatically-induced pituitary dysfunction and altered neurosensory functioning that have provided unprecedented insights and opportunities to reverse symptoms. This topic will also use these advances to explain the higher rate of degenerative dementia observed in TBI, including mTBI.
• Diagnosis, epidemiology, natural history of mTBI — discuss evolution of symptoms and prognosis;
• General biomechanics and Biomechanical models —inertial vs. blast, basis of diffuse axonal injury using models to explain;
• Neuroimaging techniques and the information they provide —advanced MRI including FLAIR, SWI, DTI, MRS, fcMRI, MEG, QEEG, SPECT/PET;
• Clinical syndromes of mTBI — Neuropsychological, Neurometabolic and Neurosensory
1. Neuropsychological — Cognitive, psychological and motor system abnormalities
2. Neurometabolic — Hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction resulting in gonadotropic, corticotropic, somatotropic deficiencies
3. Neurosensory — disordered sensory function including visual, auditory and balance systems
• Chronic effects of mTBI — TBI as a systemic disease; TBI and risk of dementia.
Keywords: Concussion, Postconcussive Syndrome, mild TBI, Neuroimaging, Hypopituitarism
Important Note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.