Dynamic Biomarkers of Response to Anti-Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer

  • 63k

    Total downloads

  • 190k

    Total views and downloads

About this Research Topic

Submission closed

Background

Immune response modulation has allowed for breakthrough progress in the treatment of many solid as well as haematological malignancies. To date, immune check-point inhibitors have been approved as first or second line therapy options in a broadening range of metastatic cancer and increasingly explored in the treatment of early stage tumors. The success of checkpoint inhibitors therapies relies on the observation of potentially long lasting responses in a limited subset of patients, ranging from 10% to 40%, depending on the malignancy subtype. However, in the remaining administered patients, these novel treatments provide a more restricted and shorter lasting effect. Efforts have been made to identify predictive factors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, with the aim to prescribe them to patients with a high probability of response and avoid to expose non-responder subjects to their potential side effects. Whilst a range of biomarkers have been investigated, their predictive potential remains unsatisfactory and, to date, the only biomarker used in clinical practice is PD-L1, whose expression in tumor tissues is predictive of response to PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade. However, a proportion, albeit small, of patients with absent PD-L1 tumor expression may still respond to PD-1 blockade, making it difficult to restrict prescription of these therapies solely based on this biomarker. Although other biomarkers have been identified, including tumor mutation burden, mismatch repair deficiency status, immune tumor microenvironment, circulating immune cells and host gut microbiota, none of the candidates tested to date has shown sufficient predictive power to enable their application in the clinical practice. Hence, the search for a biomarker of response to checkpoint inhibitors remains an unmet need.

One promising emerging approach is to focus on dynamic biomarkers, which would allow, when tested in the patient early after exposition to the therapeutic agents, to directly observe the presence or absence of an effective response and, more importantly, to identify those patients presenting an immune response failure. Notably, a number of studies have repeatedly shown a strong correlation between the circulating immune cell populations and the tumor immune infiltrate. This has led to the study of dynamic biomarkers in peripheral blood as potential predictors of response to PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade.

In this Research Topic, we would like to discuss the current advances in the study of dynamic biomarkers as predictors of the response to checkpoint inhibitors therapies in cancer.
We welcome the submission of Case Report, Original Research, Methods and Clinical Trials covering, but not limited to the following subtopics:

- Monitoring specific anti-tumor immune responses to tumor associated antigens and/or neoantigens before and during the course of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment
- Identification of phenotypic markers in immune cells before and during the course of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment
- Identification of cytokines/chemokines specifically generated before and during the course of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment
- Biomarkers associated with treatment related toxicity after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Topic Editor Dr. Merghou is co-founder of and has equity in Imvaq therapeutics. Dr. Merghou reports grants from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Surface Oncology, Kyn Therapeutics, Infinity Pharmaceuticals, Peregrine Pharmeceuticals, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Leap Therapeutics, Aprea.
The other Topic Editors declare no conflict of interest with regard to the Research Topic theme.

Keywords: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI), Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1), Stable disease (SD), Durable Clinical Benefit (DCB), PD-L1, Dynamic biomarkers

Important note: All contributions to this Research Topic must be within the scope of the section and journal to which they are submitted, as defined in their mission statements. Frontiers reserves the right to guide an out-of-scope manuscript to a more suitable section or journal at any stage of peer review.

Frequently asked questions

  • Frontiers' Research Topics are collaborative hubs built around an emerging theme.Defined, managed, and led by renowned researchers, they bring communities together around a shared area of interest to stimulate collaboration and innovation.

    Unlike section journals, which serve established specialty communities, Research Topics are pioneer hubs, responding to the evolving scientific landscape and catering to new communities.

  • The goal of Frontiers' publishing program is to empower research communities to actively steer the course of scientific publishing. Our program was implemented as a three-part unit with fixed field journals, flexible specialty sections, and dynamically emerging Research Topics, connecting communities of different sizes and maturity.

    Research Topics originate from the scientific community. Many of our Research Topics are suggested by existing editorial board members who have identified critical challenges or areas of interest in their field.

  • As an editor, Research Topics will help you build your journal, as well as your community, around emerging, cutting-edge research. As research trailblazers, Research Topics attract high-quality submissions from leading experts all over the world.

    A thriving Research Topic can potentially evolve into a new specialty section if there is sustained interest and a growing community around it.

  • Each Research Topic must be approved by the specialty chief editor, and it falls under the editorial oversight of our editorial boards, supported by our in-house research integrity team. The same standards and rigorous peer review processes apply to articles published as part of a Research Topic as for any other article we publish.

    In 2023, 80% of the Research Topics we published were edited or co-edited by our editorial board members, who are already familiar with their journal's scope, ethos, and publishing model. All other topics are guest edited by leaders in their field, each vetted and formally approved by the specialty chief editor.

  • Publishing your article within a Research Topic with other related articles increases its discoverability and visibility, which can lead to more views, downloads, and citations. Research Topics grow dynamically as more published articles are added, causing frequent revisiting, and further visibility.

    As Research Topics are multidisciplinary, they are cross-listed in several fields and section journals – increasing your reach even more and giving you the chance to expand your network and collaborate with researchers in different fields, all focusing on expanding knowledge around the same important topic.

    Our larger Research Topics are also converted into ebooks and receive social media promotion from our digital marketing team.

  • Frontiers offers multiple article types, but it will depend on the field and section journals in which the Research Topic will be featured. The available article types for a Research Topic will appear in the drop-down menu during the submission process.

    Check available article types here 

  • Yes, we would love to hear your ideas for a topic. Most of our Research Topics are community-led and suggested by researchers in the field. Our in-house editorial team will contact you to talk about your idea and whether you’d like to edit the topic. If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. 

    Suggest your topic here 

  • A team of guest editors (called topic editors) lead their Research Topic. This editorial team oversees the entire process, from the initial topic proposal to calls for participation, the peer review, and final publications.

    The team may also include topic coordinators, who help the topic editors send calls for participation, liaise with topic editors on abstracts, and support contributing authors. In some cases, they can also be assigned as reviewers.

  • As a topic editor (TE), you will take the lead on all editorial decisions for the Research Topic, starting with defining its scope. This allows you to curate research around a topic that interests you, bring together different perspectives from leading researchers across different fields and shape the future of your field. 

    You will choose your team of co-editors, curate a list of potential authors, send calls for participation and oversee the peer review process, accepting or recommending rejection for each manuscript submitted.

  • As a topic editor, you're supported at every stage by our in-house team. You will be assigned a single point of contact to help you on both editorial and technical matters. Your topic is managed through our user-friendly online platform, and the peer review process is supported by our industry-first AI review assistant (AIRA).

  • If you’re an early-stage researcher, we will offer you the opportunity to coordinate your topic, with the support of a senior researcher as the topic editor. This provides you with valuable editorial experience, improving your ability to critically evaluate research articles and enhancing your understanding of the quality standards and requirements for scientific publishing, as well as the opportunity to discover new research in your field, and expand your professional network.

  • Yes, certificates can be issued on request. We are happy to provide a certificate for your contribution to editing a successful Research Topic.

  • Research Topics thrive on collaboration and their multi-disciplinary approach around emerging, cutting-edge themes, attract leading researchers from all over the world.

  • As a topic editor, you can set the timeline for your Research Topic, and we will work with you at your pace. Typically, Research Topics are online and open for submissions within a few weeks and remain open for participation for 6 – 12 months. Individual articles within a Research Topic are published as soon as they are ready.

    Find out more about our Research Topics

  • Our fee support program ensures that all articles that pass peer review, including those published in Research Topics, can benefit from open access – regardless of the author's field or funding situation.

    Authors and institutions with insufficient funding can apply for a discount on their publishing fees. A fee support application form is available on our website.

  • In line with our mission to promote healthy lives on a healthy planet, we do not provide printed materials. All our articles and ebooks are available under a CC-BY license, so you can share and print copies.

Participating Journals

Impact

  • 190kTopic views
  • 125kArticle views
  • 63kArticle downloads
View impact