Aidan Renata ^1,2* Renan Guarese ^3* Marcel Takac ² Fabio Zambetta ³

• ¹ Faculty of Health, Deakin Univeristy, Burwood, Australia
• ² Department of Psychology, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
• ³ School of Computing Technologies, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia

The mental processes involved in understanding another individual's perceptions has been implicated in higher-order social cognition and abilities like theory of mind and empathy.Understanding another person's visual perceptions is known as visuospatial perspective taking, with evidence to date demonstrating it is delineated into two levels that are determined by how much mental effort is required to understand the other's perspective, depending on how different that perspective is. Some strategies for visuospatial perspective taking have also been found to involve embodied cognition. However, the current generalisation of these findings is limited due to experimental setup and the use of computer monitors as the interface for experimental tasks. Augmented reality interfaces could possibly extend on the generalisation of these findings by situating virtual stimuli in the real environment, thus providing a higher degree of ecological validity and experimental standardisation. Augmented reality interfaces (AR) are used as tools for research on social cognition and empathy. While mounting evidence suggests their effectiveness, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. Understanding these may provide insight for future interventions. There have been calls for research to focus on behavioural measures of the lower-level processes and abilities of empathy and social cognition.One such lower-level ability is visuospatial perspective taking (VSPT) -the process of inferring another's visual perspective through mental rotation. This study aimed to observe visuospatial perspective taking in augmented reality. This was achieved in participant experiments (N = 24) using the Left-Right behavioural speeded decision task, which requires participants to discriminate between target objects relative to the perspective of an avatar. Angular disparity and posture congruence between the avatar and participant were manipulated between each trial to delineate between the two levels of visuospatial perspective taking and understand its potentially embodied nature. Although generalised linear mixed modeling indicated that angular disparity increased task difficulty, unexpectedly findings on posture congruence were less clear. Together, this suggests that visuospatial perspective taking in this study can be delineated across two levels. Further implications for embodied cognition and empathy research are discussed.