Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines
- 1North Downs Specialist Referrals, Bletchingley, United Kingdom
- 2Hospital Aúna Especialidades Veterinarias IVC Evidensia, Paterna, Spain
- 3La Merced Veterinary Specialists, Alicante, Spain
- 4Bluepearl, Malvern, PA, United States
- 5Veterinary Institute, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland
- 6Department of Clinical Oncology, Tierklinik Hofheim, Hofheim, Germany
- 7Japan Small Animal Cancer Center, Tokorozawa, Japan
- 8Oncology Unit, Clinique Hopia, Guyancourt, France
- 9CECAV, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
- 10Evidensia Specialist Animal Hospital Strömsholm, Strömsholm, Sweden
- 11Department of Physiology and Oncology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary
- 12VCA Clinical Studies, Katonah-Bedford Veterinary Center, Bedford Hills, NY, United States
A corrigendum on
Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines
by Polton, G., Borrego, J. F., Clemente-Vicario, F., Clifford, C. A., Jagielski, D., Kessler, M., Kobayashi, T., Lanore, D., Queiroga, F. L., Rowe, A. T., Vajdovich, P., and Bergman, P. J. (2024). Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1359426. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1359426
In the published article, there was an error. In the Conflict of Interest section, one author (Philip J. Bergman) forgot to declare a potential conflict of interest.
A correction has been made to the Conflict of Interest statement. This sentence previously stated:
“The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The corrected sentence appears below:
“PB receives a yearly minority royalty stream payment through Boerhinger Ingelheim Animal Health (BIAH) for a license related to xenogeneic DNA patent #US20020150589A1. He also serves on the BIAH VOAB (Veterinary Oncology Advisory Board) and is a paid speaker on various oncology topics.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.”
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: dog, cat, melanoma, prognosis, consensus, treatment, guidelines
Citation: Polton G, Borrego JF, Clemente-Vicario F, Clifford CA, Jagielski D, Kessler M, Kobayashi T, Lanore D, Queiroga FL, Rowe AT, Vajdovich P and Bergman PJ (2024) Corrigendum: Melanoma of the dog and cat: consensus and guidelines. Front. Vet. Sci. 11:1442751. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1442751
Received: 02 June 2024; Accepted: 24 June 2024;
Published: 02 July 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Polton, Borrego, Clemente-Vicario, Clifford, Jagielski, Kessler, Kobayashi, Lanore, Queiroga, Rowe, Vajdovich and Bergman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gerry Polton, Gerry.Polton@ndsr.co.uk