Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Sports Act. Living
Sec. Sports Science, Technology and Engineering
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1512010
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Sports Science: Enhancing Performance, Health, and Education View all articles

Addressing Grading Bias in Rock Climbing: Machine and Deep Learning Approaches

Provisionally accepted
  • University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The determination rock climbing route difficulty is notoriously subjective. While there is no official standard for determining the difficulty of a rock climbing route, various difficulty rating scales exist. But as the sport gains more popularity and prominence on the international stage at the Olympic Games, the need for standardized determination of route difficulty becomes more important. In commercial climbing gyms, consistency and accuracy in route production are crucial for success. Route setters often rely on personal judgment when determining route difficulty, but the success of commercial climbing gyms requires their objectivity in creating diverse, inclusive, and accurate routes. Machine and deep learning techniques have the potential to introduce a standardized form of route difficulty determination. This survey review categorizes machine and deep learning approaches taken, identifies the methods and algorithms used, reports their degree of success, and proposes areas of future work for determining route difficulty. The primary three approaches were from a route-centric, climber-centric, or path finding and path generation context. Of these, the most optimal methods used natural language processing or recurrent neural network algorithms. From these methods, it is argued that the objective difficulty of a rock climbing route has been best determined by route-centric, natural-language-like approaches.

    Keywords: Rock climbing, Bouldering, route grade difficulty, deep learning, machine learning

    Received: 16 Oct 2024; Accepted: 19 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 O'Mara and Mahmud. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Mdshaad Mahmud, University of New Hampshire, Durham, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.