
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Radiol.
Sec. Artificial Intelligence in Radiology
Volume 5 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fradi.2025.1503625
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a critical role in diagnosing and planning treatment for spinal conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal canal stenosis, and disc herniation. Measuring the cross-sectional area of the dural sac (DSCA) is a key factor in evaluating the severity of spinal canal narrowing. Traditionally, radiologists perform this measurement manually, which is both time-consuming and susceptible to errors. Advances in deep learning, particularly convolutional neural networks (CNNs) like the U-Net architecture, have demonstrated significant potential in the analysis of medical images. This study evaluates the efficacy of deep learning models for automating DSCA measurements in lumbar spine MRIs to enhance diagnostic precision and alleviate the workload of radiologists. For algorithm development and assessment, we utilized two extensive, anonymized online datasets: the "Lumbar Spine MRI Dataset" and the SPIDER-MRI dataset. The combined dataset comprised 683 lumbar spine MRI scans for training and testing, with an additional 50 scans reserved for external validation. We implemented and assessed three deep learning models-U-Net, Attention U-Net, and MultiResUNet-using 5-fold crossvalidation. The models were trained on T1-weighted axial MRI images and evaluated on metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and mean absolute error (MAE). All models exhibited a high correlation between predicted and actual DSCA values. The MultiResUNet model achieved superior results, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9917 and an MAE of 23.7032 mm² on the primary dataset. This high precision and reliability were consistent in external validation, where the MultiResUNet model attained an accuracy of 99.95%, a recall of 0.9989, and an F1-score of 0.9393. Bland-Altman analysis revealed that most discrepancies between predicted and actual DSCA values fell within the limits of agreement, further affirming the robustness of these models. This study demonstrates that deep learning models, particularly MultiResUNet, offer high accuracy and reliability in the automated segmentation and calculation of DSCA in lumbar spine MRIs. These models hold significant potential for improving diagnostic accuracy and reducing the workload of radiologists. Future research should include larger, more diverse datasets and additional image weightings to further validate and enhance the generalizability and clinical utility of these models.
Keywords: deep learning, Lumbar spine MRI, Dural Sac Cross-Sectional Area (DSCA), Medical image segmentation, MultiResUNet, Automated diagnosis, Spinal canal stenosis, radiological assessment
Received: 10 Oct 2024; Accepted: 10 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Ghobrial and Roth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
George Ghobrial, Klinikum Bremerhaven-Reinkenheide, Bremerhaven, Germany
PD Dr. Christian Roth, Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Bremen-Mitte Clinic, Bremen, 28205, Bremen, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.