94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Organizational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1607593
Corrigendum: Measuring appreciation made EA-SI-the development of a short scale to measure experienced appreciation in social interactions at work
Provisionally accepted- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In the published article, there was an error in Supplementary "8.1 Appendix A -Different Approaches to Define and Measure Appreciation". The exemplary items and citations regarding two of the different understandings of appreciation mentioned in Appendix A were erroneous and/ or incomplete.The erroneous items were:(1) I feel that my work is being rewarded.(2) I feel satisfied with the rewards I receive for my work.(3) My salary is adequate for the work I do.(1) I feel that my efforts at work are often recognized and appreciated.(2) When I do something well, I am praised or thanked for it.(3) My contributions to the team are valued by my colleagues and supervisor.Leiter and Maslach (1999) Bregenzer et al. (2022) The erroneous citation was:White (2016)The correct material statement appears below.PAGE \* Arabic \* MERGEFORMAT 3The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.End of template, if you would like to request a correction for a reason not seen here, please contact the journal's Editorial Office
Keywords: appreciation, EA-SI Work Scale, work engagement, burnout, positive work
Received: 07 Apr 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Resch, Nagelmann and Bellhäuser. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Maximilian Stefan Resch, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.