ERRATUM article

Front. Psychol., 09 April 2025

Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601825

Erratum: Psychometric proprieties analyses of psychological vulnerability scale for secondary school students

  • Frontiers Media SA, Lausanne, Switzerland

An Erratum on
Psychometric proprieties analyses of psychological vulnerability scale for secondary school students

by Araújo, O., Freitas, O., Sousa, G., Ribeiro, I., Carvalho, J. C., and Martins, S. (2025). Front. Psychol. 15:1462830. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1462830

Due to a technical error, an earlier version of the manuscript was published instead of the latest, revised version.

The publisher apologizes for this mistake.

The original article has been updated.

Keywords: mental health, psychological vulnerability, secondary students, validation study, literacy

Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2025) Erratum: Psychometric proprieties analyses of psychological vulnerability scale for secondary school students. Front. Psychol. 16:1601825. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1601825

Received: 28 March 2025; Accepted: 28 March 2025;
Published: 09 April 2025.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2025 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2VAZnJvbnRpZXJzaW4ub3Jn

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more