ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Cultural Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1597967

This article is part of the Research TopicIntercultural Communication and International StudentsView all 8 articles

How Perceived Discrimination and Trust Dynamics Influence Social Integration in Acculturation and Reacculturation: The Case of Chinese International Student Returnees

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Independent researcher, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
  • 2Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: When coming to a new social environment, many people unfortunately are under the mental burden of perceived discrimination. The Chinese international student returnees in the post-COVID-19 era present a special case where they experienced considerable discrimination issues during both the processes of acculturation in the host countries as well as reacculturation after returning to China. This study aims to investigate group-based influences on the impacts of discrimination-related perceptions toward social integration (and reintegration) degrees through different psychological pathways of trust. Analysis: Employing Bayesian analyses aided by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms on survey data of 1014 Chinese international student returnees, the study examines the multi-layered influences of perceived discrimination and trust (both generalized and personalized) on social integration. Findings: We found that in the foreign social environment, interestingly, the degree of acculturation and perceived discrimination has a positive association. Generalized trust positively moderates this association while personalized trust has a negative moderating effect. In the domestic social environment, perceived discrimination is positively associated with the degree of negative mental health induced by concerns about whether to stay in China or emigrate. Generalized trust positively moderates this association, while personalized trust negatively moderates it. Conclusions: The findings suggest the possible information exchange pathways where different types of trust and group-based perceptions interact.

Keywords: Generalized trust, Personalized trust, Discrimination, Acculturation, Returnees

Received: 04 Apr 2025; Accepted: 24 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Le and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ruining Jin, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.