
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Organizational Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1578950
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Background: With the in-depth implementation of innovation-driven development strategies, University-Industry Collaboration (UIC) has become an important pathway for promoting technological innovation and industrial upgrading. However, enterprises, as one of the main collaboration entities, show significant differences in their participation enthusiasm and depth. Existing research mainly explores UIC influencing factors from resource dependence and knowledge management perspectives, with insufficient exploration of the enterprise cognitive dimension. This study constructs an analytical framework based on social cognitive theory to systematically examine how multiple cognitive factors and environmental factors influence enterprise decision-making in UIC participation. Purpose: To reveal how observational learning, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and policy support jointly influence enterprises' decision-making process in UIC participation, and to explore the moderating role of organizational characteristics in this process. Methods: Through a questionnaire survey of 300 enterprises in China's coastal regions, this study employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to analyze the influence mechanisms of observational learning, self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and policy support on enterprises' willingness to participate in UIC. Results: The research found that: (1) observational learning, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations have significant positive impacts on enterprise participation willingness (β=0.285, 0.312, 0.356, p<0.001), with outcome expectations showing the strongest direct effect; (2) risk and cost perceptions significantly inhibit participation willingness (β=-0.245, p<0.001), this indicates enterprises carefully weigh potential benefits against perceived risks when making UIC participation decisions; (3) policy support indirectly promotes participation willingness by enhancing enterprise selfefficacy (β=0.298, p<0.001); (4) enterprises' innovation capabilities and resource endowments positively moderate the relationship between policy support and participation willingness (β=0.187, p<0.01).This research extends the application of social cognitive theory in inter-organizational collaboration research, provides empirical evidence for policy design and enterprise practice, and emphasizes the need to enhance UIC effectiveness through capacity building, differentiated policy support, and risk management.
Keywords: social cognitive theory, university-industry collaboration, enterprise participation, Influencing factors, policy empowerment, Decision-making mechanisms
Received: 18 Feb 2025; Accepted: 21 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jun Liu, Weifang University of Science and Technology, Weifang, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.