
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Personality and Social Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1575123
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Stereotypes and biases towards social categories are often reflected in mental representations of faces. The current study used a two-phase reverse correlation procedure to visualize mental representations of the face of a Scientist, a Hero, a Genius, and a Person. In the first phase, 20 participants completed four blocks of a two-image forced-choice task. In each block, they selected which face out of a pair looked like one of the four categories. The images they selected were averaged to create classification images (CIs) which are proxy images for their mental representations of the four categories. In the second phase of the study, 251 naive participants rated the CIs on a number of valenced and demographic characteristics. We found that the scientist image was rated as the most White and male, which reflects stereotypes about who pursues scientific careers. The scientist image was also rated more negatively than the other CIs on several characteristics, which might reflect negative biases towards scientists as unsociable, poor communicators, and incompetent authority figures, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. These findings extend our understanding of the way social categories are represented, and how the classification image method can be used to uncover stereotypes and attitudes regarding these social categories.
Keywords: stereotypes, stem, social representations, face perception, classification images
Received: 11 Feb 2025; Accepted: 31 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Shakil, Siddiqui and Rutherford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
M.D. Rutherford, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.