
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CONCEPTUAL ANALYSIS article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1569344
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
This paper addresses the challenges of measuring complex, socially constructed, context-dependent phenomena, using writing assessment as an example. The wider literature in the social sciences, specifically in psychology and often relating to measurement, identifies a disconnection between real-world observations and scientific measurement of social phenomena. Drawing on interdisciplinary research, the paper considers the factors of context-dependency, conceptual ambiguity and the role of language both in the manifestation of these phenomena and as a tool for research. To address the resulting challenges, the application of the consensual assessment technique (CAT) as a context-sensitive measurement to assess writing quality is presented. Findings from three empirical studies demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of this method for writing quality and, potentially, beyond. The paper thus contributes to addressing theoretical and methodological challenges in social science research, offering a new way to study complex, socially constructed, context-dependent phenomena beyond the constraints of traditional experimental designs.
Keywords: Philosophy of science, methodology, context, Language, Writing
Received: 10 Feb 2025; Accepted: 14 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Canton and Zahn. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Ursula Canton, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, United Kingdom
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.