
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Environmental Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567378
This article is part of the Research TopicClimate Change AnxietyView all 10 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The extreme, closed, and isolated environments of Arctic research stations have resulted in substantial challenges in the daily life and work of polar science expedition team members, including various mental health problems. The mental health of the Arctic team members is related to the restorative quality of the station environment, which is primarily influenced by design factors. However, previous studies have mainly discussed these factors separately using a single approach, rarely providing comprehensive understanding into team members' perceptions of the station environment in an integrated manner. Therefore, this study uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to determine the design factors and dimensions that affect the restorative potential of Arctic research stations, filling the gap in the design weight of restorative potential factors. First, environmental factors related to the mental health of team members in Arctic research stations were gradually screened through a literature review and semi-structured interviews. Then, questionnaire was used to collect the perspectives of 63 Chinese scientific research team members. Correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and statistical weight calculation were applied to the responses to investigate the restorative quality of design characteristics within a framework. The results showed that 24 design factors were associated with a restorative scientific research station environment. Among them, privacy of space was the most significant factor that could influence psychological recovery. Five primary components were identified: indoor conditions, configuration of space, physical environment, spatial perception, and space safety. Additionally, nine secondary components were identified: appearance design, spatial scale, interior facilities, space function, outdoor environmental influences, room adjustments, personal contact, interaction, and space safety. The weight calculation shows that indoor conditions and space configuration are the most significant dimensions that influence the restorative quality. In this study, the environmental factors and key dimensions of an Arctic research station were screened in a targeted manner to provide a theoretical basis and practical suggestions for architectural design of Arctic research stations that are more suitable for team members.
Keywords: Arctic research station, Mental Health, restorative environment theory, Design factors, Principal Component Analysis, Factor weight
Received: 27 Jan 2025; Accepted: 11 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Li and Zou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Guangtian Zou, School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.