
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1562807
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are restricted latent class models that are widely used in educational and psychological fields. Attribute hierarchy, as an important structural feature of the CDM, can provide critical information for inferring examinees' attribute mastery patterns. Previous studies usually formulate likelihood ratio (LR) tests for full models and hierarchical models to validate attribute hierarchies, but their asymptotic distributions tend to become non-standard, resulting in test failures. This study proposes the Wald statistic to statistically test the a priori defined attribute hierarchy. Specifically, two covariance matrix estimators, empirical cross-product information matrix (XPD), and observed information matrix (Obs), are considered to compute the Wald statistic, referred to as Wald-XPD and Wald-Obs, respectively.Simulation studies with various factors were conducted to investigate the performance of the new methods. The results show that Wald-XPD has an acceptable empirical performance with high or low quality items and a higher test efficiency. Real datasets were also analyzed for illustrative purpose.
Keywords: Cognitive diagnosis model, attribute hierarchy, covariance matrix, information matrix, likelihood ratio test
Received: 18 Jan 2025; Accepted: 04 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, Jiang, Xin and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Tao Xin, Collaborative Innovation Center of Assessment for Basic Education Quality, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, Beijing, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.