ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1541248

Lying to an older adult in a sharing situation: Differences between young and mid-life adults

Provisionally accepted
Eitan  ElaadEitan Elaad*Yakir  BrachaYakir BrachaHodaya  AvrahamHodaya AvrahamChen  RabiChen RabiTalya  KatzinTalya Katzin
  • Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The present study aimed to demonstrate lying to older adults by young and mid-life participants in the Ultimatum Game (UG). Another goal was to reexamine the Self-Reported Lying Scale (SRLS), validate the short Hebrew version of the need for cognition scale (NCS-6), and show how they predict lying in the present experimental conditions.We allocated 379 examinees (196 women) to six experimental conditions in a 2 × 3 factorial design. Two participant's age conditions (young and middle-aged) and three receiver's age conditions (25, 50, and 70 years).Participants underwent a UG where they were permitted to conceal part of the endowment from the receiving woman. They then shared the remaining money with the receiver. Finally, participants completed the SRLS and the NCS-6.Results: Participants (mainly young) tended to evaluate an older woman less favorably than younger versions of that woman. Young participants concealed more of their endowment than mid-life participants. Young participants were more generous than their mid-life counterparts when sharing the remaining endowment with the older woman. Hiding a more significant part of the endowment while offering a fairer share of the remaining award (Fake Fairness) was observed for young participants. Fake Fairness to the older woman by younger participants was more significant than the receiver's younger variations.The SRLS global score and four subscales predicted participants' lying in the UG.NCS-6 prediction of lying was also significant, although less efficient than the SRLS.Discussion: The present study aimed to examine ageism by lying to an older woman in the UG. Indeed, young participants lied more to an older receiver than to younger versions of that receiver, whereas mid-life participants did not. We suggest that midlife participants prepare themselves psychologically to join an older community and, therefore, are more tolerant toward older people than their younger counterparts.Young participants scored higher on the SRLS and lied more in the UG than mid-life participants. The present study contributes to a better understanding of the different approaches to lying by young and mid-life people. Young participants were relatively free to consider lying and behaving deceptively, whereas mid-life participants restricted their lying behavior and attitudes toward lying.

Keywords: lying, ageism, ultimatum game, age differences, fake fairness, Self-Reported Lying Scale

Received: 20 Dec 2024; Accepted: 07 Apr 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Elaad, Bracha, Avraham, Rabi and Katzin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Eitan Elaad, Department of Psychology, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.