The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Movement Science
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1533785
This article is part of the Research Topic Towards a Psychophysiological Approach in Physical Activity, Exercise, and Sports-Volume IV View all 12 articles
SELF-SELECTED VS. PRESCRIBED AERBOBIC EXERCISE INTENSITY: IMPACTS ON PLEASURE IN WOMEN WITH OBESITY
Provisionally accepted
Carlos Eduardo Rosa Da Silva *
Wilian de Jesus Santana 
Gustavo Almeida 
Adriano Verame Antonio Roberto Doro Eduardo Barbosa Leonardo Lima Helton Magalhães Dias Marcelo Callegari Zanetti 
AYLTON Jose FIGUEIRA JUNIOR - Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
Introduction: Self-selection of aerobic training intensity is an approach that allows practitioners to develop autonomy (choice of pace), improve physical fitness, and contribute to better affective responses and training adherence. However, it is still unclear whether self-selection of training intensity in group settings is comparable to individual training conditions. The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of three aerobic training protocols on psychophysiological responses in physically inactive adult obese women. Methods: The sample consisted of 90 women with a mean age of 48.3 ± 5.5 years and BMI of 31.2 ± 4.8 kg/m², who participated in three treadmill aerobic training protocols: 1-Control group (IPI) with individually prescribed intensity (64% to 76% of HRmax), 2-Small group (SGS) with self-selected intensity, and 3-Individual with self-selected intensity (ISS). Heart rate (HR), total session volume (VL), affective valence was determined by feeling scale (FS), enjoyment was determined by Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PACES), intention to repeat the exercise session (INT), and Basic Psychological Needs Satisfaction Scale (BPNFS) were evaluated. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way ANOVA for HR and FS, and one-way ANOVA for VL, PACES, INT, and BPNFS with Tukey post hoc test and significance criteria (p<.05). Results: The results showed that HR and VL were similar (p>.05) between the protocols IPI, SGS and ISS, while FS, PACES, and INT were significantly higher in SGS and ISS than IPI protocols (p<.05). BPNFS also presented better results for the SGS and ISS protocols (p<.05). Discussion: These findings suggest that the intensity and training volume were similar among different protocols. Affective responses were more positive perceived in SGS and ISS protocols. Conclusion: We conclude that intensity selfselection is a safe, effective, and comparable strategy to prescribed intensity at moderate levels, providing a more enjoyable experience that may contribute to greater adherence to aerobic training.
Keywords: psychophysiological responses, enjoyment, Motivation, physical activity, small group training
Received: 24 Nov 2024; Accepted: 23 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Da Silva, Santana, Almeida, Verame, Doro, Barbosa, Lima, Dias, Zanetti and FIGUEIRA JUNIOR. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Carlos Eduardo Rosa Da Silva, Universidade São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.