Skip to main content

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Quantitative Psychology and Measurement

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1526181

Psychometric evaluation and community norms of the GAD-7, based on a representative German sample

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Germany
  • 2 Ulm University Medical Center, Ulm, Germany
  • 3 Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Zürich, Switzerland
  • 4 Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    The Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) scale is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of generalized anxiety symptoms in the general and clinical populations. The aim of the present study is to investigate its psychometric properties in a large sample representative for the adult population of the Federal Republic of Germany (N = 2519) and to provide updated population norms. We assessed item characteristics such as item means, standard deviations as well as inter-item correlations. Construct validity was assessed by correlating the scales with scales assessing depression, anxiety and somatization (PHQ-9, BSI-18). Internal consistency was assessed via coefficient omega. Factorial validity was assessed via confirmatory factor analysis of the assumed one factorial model. Measurement invariance was investigated via multi-group confirmatory factor analyses across gender and age. Population based norms for the total sample as well as for various age-groups are provided. Our results attested sound psychometric properties for the GAD-7 in the general population in terms of internal consistency and construct validity. Measurement invariance analyses indicate that measurements obtained with the GAD-7 can be compared across gender and age. The updated norms provide a useful basis for clinical practice as well as epidemiological research.

    Keywords: GAD-7, Generalized anxiety, Self-report questionnaire, Population norms, Psychometrics, Measurement invariance

    Received: 11 Nov 2024; Accepted: 28 Feb 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Kliem, Sachser, Lohmann, Baier, Braehler, Fegert and Gündel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Sören Kliem, Ernst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Jena, Germany
    Dirk Baier, Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, 8401, Zürich, Switzerland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more