ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Personality and Social Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1519113
To empathize with a group or an individual? Investigating the role of cognitive cost and distress in empathy choice
Provisionally accepted
- 1Linköping University, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping, Sweden
- 2Decision Research, Eugene, Oregon, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Why do we feel empathy in certain situations, but not others? Previous research has found that people often avoid empathizing when perceived as costly. This study aims to replicate and extend these findings by investigating whether the choice to empathize differs between a group or an individual. Following the empathy selection task paradigm, participants (N = 296) in a within-subject experiment made a series of free choices (empathy choice) selecting whether to engage in empathy or stay objective concerning a single individual and a group of individuals.They also rated perceived cognitive cost and distress concerning empathizing and staying objective. The results show that participants chose to remain objective more often than empathizing in the individual condition along with rating high levels of cognitive effort and distress. In contrast, participants in the group condition more often chose to empathize despite also rating it as more effortful and distressing. We discuss the importance of contextual factors as a main contributor to the difference in empathy choice between group and individual targets.
Keywords: Empathy, empathy choice, Decision Making, cognitive cost, distress, empathy selection task, Emotion Regulation
Received: 29 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Moche, Noryd, Rydén and Vastfjall. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Hajdi Moche, Linköping University, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping, Sweden
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.