The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Comparative Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 |
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1508789
LATENT AND CONDITIONED INHIBITION IN HUMANS
Provisionally accepted- 1 Department of Basic Psychological Processes and Development, University of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
- 2 University of York, York, United Kingdom
- 3 University of New South Wales, Kensington, New South Wales, Australia
Latent inhibition refers to the retardation in learning an association between a target stimulus and an outcome when the target stimulus has been pre-exposed in the absence of consequences. The inhibitory properties of latent inhibitors have been the subject of controversy, as standard latent inhibition training—consisting of pre-exposure to the target stimulus alone—does not provide the latent inhibitor with the ability to pass a summation test, a key criterion for demonstrating genuine inhibition. However, previous research with animals has shown that a specific pre-exposure procedure, in which the target stimulus (A) is presented in compound with successive novel stimuli (An1, An2, An3...), can endow the target with sufficient inhibitory properties to pass both retardation and summation tests. To examine whether this phenomenon generalizes to humans, we conducted two experiments using a video game-based conditioning paradigm. Experiment 1 demonstrated that this compound pre-exposure schedule enhanced the retardation effect compared to standard pre-exposure or control conditions. Experiment 2 revealed that the target stimulus pre-exposed with novel stimuli significantly reduced responding when tested in compound with an excitatory conditioned stimulus, thus passing the summation test. These results suggest that compound pre-exposure facilitates the acquisition of inhibitory properties in humans, consistent with findings from animal studies. The findings are discussed within the framework of Hall and Rodriguez’s (2010) model, emphasizing the role of expectancy violation during pre-exposure in strengthening inhibitory associations. Implications for clinical applications, particularly in enhancing exposure therapy for anxiety disorders, are also considered.
Keywords: latent inhibition, Inhibitory learning, Nonreinforced preexposure, Exposure therapy, comparative psychology
Received: 09 Oct 2024; Accepted: 22 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Liberal, Rodríguez, Nogueiras, Nelson and Hall. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Unai Liberal, Department of Basic Psychological Processes and Development, University of the Basque Country, Donostia-San Sebastián, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.