Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Psychol.

Sec. Personality and Social Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1507031

Mental Simulation and Compulsive Buying: A Multiple Mediation Model through Impulse Buying and Self-Control

Provisionally accepted
  • Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    This study explores the multiple mediation effects of impulse buying and a self-control failure on the relationship between two types of mental simulation-outcome and process simulation-and compulsive buying. We collected 202 responses using a web-based survey, which were used as a final example. The respondents for this study were recruited through the web-based survey platform Nown Survey. Using structural equation modeling and PROCESS for SPSS (Model 6), we estimated the internal consistency of measurements and tested the established hypotheses. The main findings confirm the distinct impacts of the two types of mental simulation on primary constructs and the multiple mediation effects of impulse buying and self-control failure on the associations between the two types of mental simulation and compulsive buying. Despite the multiple mediating effects of impulse buying and self-control failure between the two types of mental simulation and compulsive buying, process simulation is positively associated with both impulse buying and compulsive buying, while outcome simulation is significantly related only to impulse buying. Our results supplement existing literature by applying new insights into the relationships between mental simulation and compulsive buying. Further, our findings may help marketers to establish strategies based on the divergent roles of the two types of mental simulation to motivate consumers' purchase behaviors. Finally, the limitations and directions for future research are discussed.

    Keywords: impulse buying1, compulsive buying2, self-control3, mental simulation4, process simulation5, outcome simulation6

    Received: 06 Oct 2024; Accepted: 03 Mar 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Duan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Xiaowei Duan, Zhejiang Shuren University, Hangzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

    Research integrity at Frontiers

    Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

    94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

    Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


    Find out more